Identification of new religious movements in R. Stark’s research programme
Keywords:
sociology of religion, social identification, new religious movements, religion and society, church, rejection of society, tension with societyAbstract
This article is devoted to the problem of identification of new religious movements in the research programme of the famous American sociologist of religion Rodney Stark. The author describes in general terms the legacy, contribution of the scientist to the development of the sociology of religion and the methodological shifts he made towards the analysis of religious organisations, also adjusted for a diachronic perspective. Particular attention is paid to the presentation of theoretical and methodological foundations of R. Stark’s typology of religious organisations, as well as his concept of tension with society. Based on the results of the author’s research, the problematic points proposed by R. Stark are identified, both in the methodology of analysis and in the theory of the system of relations between religious organisations and society. Specific theoretical and methodological proposals are made to resolve the revealed problems, including those based on the study of the social identification of religious organisations.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)