The phenomenon of neo-Marxism in modern China and its social implications
Keywords:
genesis and formation of neo-Marxism, neo-Marxism as practical materialism, neo-Marxism in modern ChinaAbstract
The main purpose of this article is to consider the phenomenon of neo-Marxism in modern China and to substantiate its special philosophical and methodological status as a programme of practical materialism. For this purpose, a brief historical and philosophical reconstruction of formation of neo-Marxism paradigm in the Western philosophical tradition has been carried out and its essential differences from the Chinese version of neo-Marxism have been revealed. As the most important stages of this process assimilative neo-Marxism in the late 19 – early 20th centuries, Western neo-Marxism in the 1920–80s, post-Marxism in the 1980–90s and the first decades of the 21st century are recorded. The history of formation and development of neo-Marxism paradigm in its Chinese version is also considered as consisting of three main stages: stage associated with the activities of Mao Zedong and the assertion of his ideas (sinicisation of Marxism), stage including the period of frontal reforming in China and its ideological programme in the context of Deng Xiaoping’s social initiatives, stage supposing the further development of neo-Marxism in China, deepening and concretising its social-practical orientation and the construction of socialism with Chinese specifics. This stage in the development of neo-Marxism in China is associated with the programme of its active modernisation in accordance with the new political course and activities of the Communist Party of China under Xi Jinping leadership. In the article socio-cultural status and role of neo-Marxism ideology in modern China are studied using the analysis of two its fundamental ideas and their refraction in the life of Chinese society. Firstly, this is the sphere of modernisation of the economic basis and the technology of public administration under the aegis of economic equality and social justice. Secondly, this is a programme of frontal using and dissemination of humanistic orientations in politics, culture and education.
References
- Wang Baiwen, Li Zhaoyou. A probe into Erich Fromm’s concept of the «new man». Forward Position. 2011;13:4–7. Chinese.
- Wang Qiongzhi, Peng Jun. On the self-education of young marxists. Modern Communication. 2025;1:113–120. Chinese.
- Zhang Kuiliang. The philosophical significance of «human-centred» thought. Philosophical Research. 2004;5:11–16. Chinese.
- Осипов ИД, Погодин СН. Философия марксизма. История и современность: к 200-летию со дня рождения Карла Маркса. Санкт-Петербург: Политех-пресс; 2018. 272 с.
- Зеленков АИ, Новиков ВТ, Анохина ВВ, Лазаревич АА. Социум, цивилизация, культура в исследовательских традициях классической и современной философии. Минск: БГУ; 2015. 327 с.
- Оришева ОВ. Политическое измерение социальной теории в постмарксизме. Минск: РИВШ; 2007. 132 с.
- Xi Jinping. Remarks at the symposium on philosophy and social sciences (2016 May 17). Beijing: People’s Publishing House; 2016. 29 p. Chinese.
- Jiang Chunlei. An analysis of the «practice subject» in the innovation of Marxist theory. Journal of Suzhou University of Science and Technology. 2015;1:1–5. Chinese.
- Mao Zedong. Selected works of Mao Zedong. Volume 2. Beijing: People’s Publishing House; 1991. 444 p. Chinese.
- Бурлацкий ФМ. Мао Цзэдун, Цзян Цин и советник Дэн. Москва: Эксмо-пресс; 2002. 384 с.
- Обухова ОН. Основные этапы модернизационного строительства Китая. В: Мощелков ЕН, редактор. Школа – 2005. Москва: Общественно-политическая мысль; 2005. с. 254–258.
- Deng Xiaoping. Selected works of Deng Xiaoping. Volume 2. Beijing: People’s Publishing House; 1994. 259 p. Chinese.
- Wang Yu, Chen Zhiliang, Yang Geng. The philosophical flag of our era: practical materialism. Jianghai xue kan. 1989;2:79–87. Chinese.
- Wendeng Yang, Haosheng Ye. Methodological implications of Marxist practical philosophy for psychology: a perspective from China. Theory and Psychology. 2013;23(3):371–390. DOI: 10.1177/0959354313486720.
- Rošker JS. Modernization of Chinese philosophical methodology: Zhang Dainian’s innovation and the challenges of neo-materialism. Asian Studies. 2021;9(2):121–141. DOI: 10.4312/AS.2021.2.121-141.
- Wu Xian. Study on the thinking paradigm of Laozi from the perspective of Chinese philosophy. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences. 2022;2(7):28–32.
- Zhang Wei. Chinese philosophy as a kind of field philosophy. Social Epistemology. 2021;35(4):416–425. Chinese. DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2020.1752328.
- Arun Bala. Chinese organic materialism and modern science studies: rethinking Joseph Needham’s legacy. Cultures of Science. 2020;3(1):1–13. DOI: 10.1177/2096608320911316.
- Heller A. Xian dai xing li lun. Li Ruihua, translator. Beijing: Commercial Press; 2005. 409 p. Chinese.
- Morawski S. Vicissitudes in the theory of socialist realism: a little lesson in history not to be ignored. Diogenes. 1961;9(36):110–136. DOI: 10.1177/039219216100903606.
- Sheng Guorong, Jin Zhongzhe. A technological perspective on industrial ecology. Science and Technology and Dialectical Philosophy. 2007;3:57–61. Chinese.
- Li Jifeng. Seeking the moral foundation of politics – the theoretical demands of eastern European neo-Marxism. Social Scientist. 2023;10:24–29. Chinese.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)