AI amphiboly: forbid cannot use 2.0

Authors

  • Artsiom A. Potapenko Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus
  • Alesya A. Pokhomova Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus
  • Larisa V. Filinskaya Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, education, experiences of teachers and students using artificial intelligence, regulations on the use of artificial intelligence in higher education, academic integrity
Supporting Agencies
The team of authors expresses its gratitude to the teaching staff of the faculty of philosophy and social sciences of the Belarusian State University for participation in the survey of faculty members, as well as to the 2nd year students of the speciality «Social Communications» for their assistance in conducting in-depth interviews with student youth.

Abstract

The paper considers the actual issues of application of artificial intelligence (AI) in education, which have aroused increased interest among the academic community. On the basis of empirical data obtained through a survey of 3rd and 4th year students of Belarusian State University, lecturers of the faculty of philosophy and social sciences of BSU, as well as in-depth interviews with teachers and students, the practices of using AI in educational activities are analysed. The obtained data show that students actively use neural networks to search for information, perform tasks, generate ideas, translate information into a foreign language, and check their own knowledge, but they remain sceptical about the results of AI activity: the average confidence score is 5.51 points on a 10-point scale. It is stated that the absolute majority of lecturers notice the use of generative AI technologies in students’ works. The lecturers themselves make little use of AI tools. It is emphasized that the obvious advantages of AI application are accompanied by problems and risks that can significantly worsen the quality of training of specialists with higher education. The experience of regulating the use of artificial intelligence in universities of different countries is considered. It is noted that it is necessary to prepare relevant documents defining the norms and rules for the use of AI systems in the system of higher education.

Author Biographies

  • Artsiom A. Potapenko, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    student at the faculty of philosophy and social sciences

  • Alesya A. Pokhomova, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    PhD (sociology), docent; head of the department of social communications, faculty of philosophy and social sciences

  • Larisa V. Filinskaya, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    PhD (philosophy), docent; associate professor at the department of sociology, faculty of philosophy and social sciences

References

  1. Шейнбаум ВС, Никольский ВС. Инженерная деятельность и инженерное мышление в контексте экспансии искусственного интеллекта. Высшее образование в России. 2024;33(6):9–27. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-6-9-27.
  2. Резаев АВ, Степанов АМ, Трегубова НД. Высшее образование в эпоху искусственного интеллекта. Высшее образование в России. 2024;33(4):49–62. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-4-49-62.
  3. Филинская ЛВ. Преподаватель будущего: вооруженный искусственным интеллектом. В: Мысливец НЛ, редактор. Наука и общество в условиях новых вызовов. Материалы Международной научно-практической конференции; 26–27 сентября 2024 г.; Минск, Беларусь. Минск: Институт социологии Национальной академии наук Беларуси; 2024. с. 196–198.
  4. Сысоев ПВ. Этика и ИИ-плагиат в академической среде: понимание студентами вопросов соблюдения авторской этики и проблемы плагиата в процессе взаимодействия с генеративным искусственным интеллектом. Высшее образование в России. 2024;33(2):31–53. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-2-31-53.
  5. Субботина МВ. Искусственный интеллект и высшее образование – враги или союзники. Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Социология. 2024;24(1):176–183. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2024-24-1-176-183.
  6. Проворова ТА, Сергеева НА, Чехович ЮВ. Генеративный искусственный интеллект и современный университет: новые вызовы и возможности. Вышэйшая школа. 2024;3:3–6.
  7. Филинская ЛВ, Левицкая ИВ, Мисун АА. Искусственный интеллект и образование: проблемы, риски, перспективы. Журнал Белорусского государственного университета. Социология. 2024;3:71–77. EDN: DUKHBW.
  8. Алешковский ИА, Гаспаришвили АТ, Нарбут НП, Крухмалева ОВ, Савина НЕ. Российские студенты о возможностях и ограничениях использования искусственного интеллекта в обучении. Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Социология. 2024;24(2):335–353. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2024-24-2-335-353.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-12

How to Cite

[1]
Potapenko, A.A. et al. 2025. AI amphiboly: forbid cannot use 2.0. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology. 2 (Dec. 2025), 57–68. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6821-2025-2-%p.