Ground beetle (Coleoptera:  Carabidae) community structure at the early stage of forest regeneration after sanitary logging of oxalidosum spruce forest in Belovezhskaya Pushcha

Authors

  • Mikalai G. Kazulka National Scientific Center of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus for Bioresources, Akademičnaja Street, 27, 220072, Minsk, Belarus
  • Heorhi A. Kazulka Public project «Belovezhskaya Pushcha – 21st Century» (http://bp21.org.by), Puščanskaja Street, 6, 225063, Kamenyuki, Brest region, Belarus

Keywords:

carabid beetles, species composition, spruce forest, logging, Belovezhskaya Pushcha
Supporting Agencies
Authors are grateful to doctor of science (biology), full professor O. R. Aleksandrowicz (Slupsk, Poland) and PhD (biology), docent V. A. Tsinkevich (Minsk) for providing critical comments on the manuscript

Abstract

Data on the effect from sanitation harvest upon community structure of ground beetles in the Oxalidosum spruce forest in Belovezhskaya Pushcha are given. 3028 specimens of ground beetles belonging to 45 species were collected by using pitfall traps and 42 specimens of 12 species were collected by quadrate method from April to November 1992. The structure of ground beetle communities in the forest area and the adjacent logging plot were examined. Calathus micropterus, Carabus arcensis, Carabus hortensis, Carabus nemoralis, Pterostichus niger, Pterostichus oblongopunctatus and Trechus secalis prevailed. Increasing in species diversity and reducing in the number of ground beetles after deforestation was established. Decreasing in the number of most forest species and increasing in the number of species of open habitats and the forest species Trechus secalis was recorded on the logging plot. Data obtained by pitfall traps were largely confirmed by quadrate method. 

Author Biographies

  • Mikalai G. Kazulka, National Scientific Center of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus for Bioresources, Akademičnaja Street, 27, 220072, Minsk, Belarus

    postgraduate student at the National Scientific Center of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus for Bioresources

  • Heorhi A. Kazulka, Public project «Belovezhskaya Pushcha – 21st Century» (http://bp21.org.by), Puščanskaja Street, 6, 225063, Kamenyuki, Brest region, Belarus

    PhD (biology); coordinator of the project

References

  1. Bambiza N. N., Tolkach V. N., Bernatskii D. N. [Formational and typological structure of forests of the National Park «Belovezhskaya pushcha»]. Ekologo-ekonomicheskii mekhanizm sokhraneniya bioraznoobraziya osobo okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territorii : materialy II Mezhdunar. nauchn.-prakt. konf. (Belovezhskaya pushcha, 23–25 May, 2007). Brest, 2007, P. 122–137 (in Russ.).
  2. Yurkevich I. D., Golod D. S., Parfenov V. I. [Types and associations of spruce forests: according to research in the BSSR]. Minsk, 1971 (in Russ.).
  3. Sarnackii V. V. [Spruce forests: formation, increase of productivity and stability in the conditions of Belarus]. Minsk, 2009 (in Russ.).
  4. Grodzki W., Jakuš R., Lajzová E., et al. Effects of intensive versus no management strategies during an outbreak of the bark beetle Ips typographus (L.) (Col.: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) in the Tatra Mts. in Poland and Slovakia. Ann. For. Sci. 2006. Vol. 63. P. 55– 61. DOI: 10.1051/forest:2005097.
  5. Rainio J., Niemelä J. Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators. Biodivers. Conserv. 2003. Vol. 12, issue 3. P. 487–506. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022412617568.
  6. Niemelä J., Langor D., Spence J. R. Effects of clear-cut harvesting on boreal ground-beetle assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in Western Canada. Conserv. Biol. 1993. Vol. 7, No. 3. P. 551–561. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.07030551.x.
  7. Koivula M. Alternative harvesting methods and boreal carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). For. Ecol. Manag. 2002. Vol. 167, issue 1–3. P. 103 –121. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00717-4.
  8. Saint-Germain M., Larrivée M., Drapeau P., et al. Short-term response of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) to fire and logging in a spruce-dominated boreal landscape. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005. Vol. 212. P. 118–126. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.001.
  9. Magura T., Tóthmérész B., Elek Z. Diversity and composition of carabids during a forestry cycle. Biodivers. Conserv. 2003. Vol. 12, issue 1. P. 73–85. DOI: 10.1023/A:1021289509500.
  10. Johansson T., Hjältén J., Olsson J., et al. Long-term effects of clear-cutting on epigaeic beetle assemblages in boreal forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2016. Vol. 359. P. 65–73. DOI: /10.1016/j.foreco.2015.09.041.
  11. Niemelä J., Tukia H., Halme E. Patterns of carabid diversity in Finnish mature taiga. Ann. Zool. Fennici. 1994. Vol. 31.
  12. P. 123–129.
  13. Judas M., Dornieden K., Strothmann U. Distribution patterns of carabid beetle species at the landscape-level. J. Biogeogr. 2002. Vol. 29, issue 4. P. 491–508. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00697.x.
  14. Barber H. S. Traps for cave-inhabiting insects. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 1931. Vol. 46. P. 259 –266.
  15. Gilyarov M. S. [Inventory of large soil invertebrates]. Metody pochvenno-zoologicheskikh issledovanii. Moscow, 1975. P. 12– 29 (in Russ.).
  16. Aleksandrowicz O. R. [Ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of the west forest zone of the Russian Plain]. Fauna, zoogeography, ecology, faunogenesis. Lambert Academic Publishin, 2014 (in Russ.).
  17. Lindroth C. H. Ground beetles (Carabidae) of Fennoscandia. A Zoogeographic Study : in 3 parts. Washington, 1988 –1992. Part 1 : Specific Knowledge Regarding the Species.
  18. Zar J. H. Biostatistical Analysis. 5th ed. New Jersey, 2010.
  19. Hammer Ø., Harper D. A. T., Ryan P. D. PAST: Paleontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 2001. Vol. 4, issue 1. URL: http://paleo-electronica.org/2001-1/past/past.pdf.
  20. Löbl I., Smetana A. (eds.). Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera. Vol. 1. Stenstrup, 2003.
  21. Zyabchenko S. S., Zagural’skaya L. M., Lazareva I. P. [Dynamics of ecological processes at extensive clear felling in Northern Karelia]. Lesovedenie. 1988. No. 3. P. 3 –10 (in Russ.).
  22. Isaev V. I. [Change in the ecological environment as a result of clear cuttings]. Problemy ekologicheskogo monitoringa i modelirovaniya ekosistem : sb. statei. Leningrad, 1979. Vol. 2. P. 249 –257 (in Russ.).
  23. Beaudry S., Duchesne L. C., Côté B. Short-term effects of three forestry practices on carabid assemblages in a jack pine forest. Can. J. For. Res. 1997. Vol. 27, No. 12. P. 2065–2071. DOI: 10.1139/x97-171.
  24. Szyszko J. Planning of prophylaxis in threatened pine forest biocenoses based on an analysis of the fauna of epigeic Carabidae. Warsaw, 1990.
  25. Arnol’di K. V., Matveev V. A. [Ground beetles (Carabidae) of spruce forests near the southern boundary of the taiga (Mari ASSR) and its change on felling areas]. Ekologiya pochvennykh bespozvonochnykh : sb. statei. Moscow, 1973. P. 131–143 (in Russ.).
  26. Spence J. R., Langor D. W., Niemelä J., et al. Northern forestry and carabids: the case for concern about old-growth species. Ann. Zool. Fennici. 1996. Vol. 33, issue 1. P. 173 –184.
  27. Koivula M. J. Effects of forest roads on spatial distribution of boreal carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Coleopt. Bull. 2005. Vol. 59, issue 4. P. 465– 487. DOI: /10.1649/815.1.
  28. Vermeulen H. J. W. The composition of the carabid fauna on poor sandy road-side verges in relation to comparable open areas. Biodivers. Conserv. 1993. Vol. 2, issue 4. P. 331–350. DOI: 10.1007/BF00114038.
  29. Eversham B. C., Telfer M. G. Conservation value of roadside verges for stenotopic heathland Carabidae: corridors or refugia? Biodivers. Conserv. 1994. Vol. 3, issue 6. P. 538 –545. DOI: 10.1007/BF00115159.
  30. Den Boer P. J. On the significance of dispersal power for populations of carabid-beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Oecologia. 1970. Vol. 4, issue 1. P. 1–28. DOI: 10.1007/BF00390612.
  31. Koivula M. Boreal carabid-beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) assemblages in thinned uneven-aged and clear-cut spruce stands. Ann. Zool. Fennici. 2002. Vol. 39. P. 131–149.
  32. Koivula M., Niemelä J. Boreal carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in managed spruce forests – a summary of Finnish case studies. Silva Fennica. 2002. Vol. 36, No. 1. P. 423– 436. DOI: 10.14214/sf.573.
  33. Antsiferov A. L. Features of carabid beetle fauna (Coleoptera, Carabidae) transformation in the places of deforestation at various stages of secondary succession. Izv. Penz. gos. un-ta. Est. nauki. 2011. No. 25. P. 301–306 (in Russ.).
  34. Shlyakhtenok A. S. [Ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of meadows as an object of environmental monitoring]. Fauna i ekologiya nasekomykh Berezinskogo zapovednika : sb. nauchn. statei. Minsk, 1991. P. 146 –169 (in Russ.).
  35. Thompson J. Green-tree retention in harvest units: boon or bust for biodiversity? Science Findings. 2007. No. 96.
  36. Kazulka H. A., Kazulka T. N. Role of logging residues in conservation of beneficial invertebrates. Lesnaya nauka na rubezhe XXI veka : sb. nauchn. tr. Gomel, 1997. Issue 46. P. 119 –121 (in Russ.).

Downloads

Published

2017-12-16

How to Cite

Kazulka, M. G., & Kazulka, H. A. (2017). Ground beetle (Coleoptera:  Carabidae) community structure at the early stage of forest regeneration after sanitary logging of oxalidosum spruce forest in Belovezhskaya Pushcha. Experimental Biology and Biotechnology, 2, 80-89. https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/biology/article/view/2449