Intra- and interpopulation variability of Solidago canadensis L. s. l. in Belarus

  • Valery N. Tikhomirov Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1822-0557
  • Iryna A. Ravenskaya International Sakharov Environmental Institute, Belarusian State University, 23/1 Daŭhabrodskaja Street, Minsk 220070, Belarus

Abstract

The study of the variability of 22 morphological characters in 5 populations of Solidago canadensis L. s. l., growing in the city of Minsk and its environs, was carried out. Comparison of the obtained data with previously published information on the nature and range of variability of the North American taxa Solidago subsect. Triplinerviae showed that plants growing on the territory of the Republic of Belarus cannot be unambiguously assigned to any of the North American species by the combination of morphological characters. Compared to North American taxa, the plants of the studied populations have a significantly more powerful habitus (a large average plant height, longer and in many populations broader mid stem leaves, most often a larger inflorescence), intermediate in comparison with S. canadensis s. str. and S. altissima s. str. and significantly different from both North American species, the length of involucres and the length of tubular flowers, significantly longer outer phyllaries, shorter straps of ray florets, larger ovaries of ray florets, but their shorter pappus, a significantly smaller number of disc florets. The disc florets have significantly larger teeth compared to S. canadensis s. str. and S. altissima s. str. The data obtained confirm the point of view of Hildemar Scholz, according to which the invasive goldenrod, which is currently widely distributed throughout Europe, are of European origin. Most likely, they are either stabilized hybrids that arose during breeding due to the crossing of several North American species, or arose as a result of spontaneous mutation and further selection under natural conditions.

Author Biographies

Valery N. Tikhomirov, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

PhD (biology), docent; head of the department of botany, faculty of biology

Iryna A. Ravenskaya, International Sakharov Environmental Institute, Belarusian State University, 23/1 Daŭhabrodskaja Street, Minsk 220070, Belarus

PhD (biology); associate professor at the department of environmental monitoring and management, faculty of environmental monitoring

References

  1. Semple JC, Cook RE. Solidago Linnaeus. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee. Flora of North America. Volume 20, Magnoliophyta: Asteridae. Part 2, Astereae and Senecioneae. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 107–166.
  2. Weber E. The dynamics of plant invasions: a case study of three exotic goldenrod species (Solidago L.) in Europe. Journal of Biogeography. 1998;25(1):147–154. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.1998.251119.x.
  3. Kurtto A, Helynranta L. Helsingin kasvit. Kukkivilta kiviltä metsän syliin. Helsinki: City of Helsinki Environment Centre and Helsinki University Press; 1998. 400 p.
  4. Kowarik I. Biologische invasionen: Neophyten und neozoen in mitteleuropa. Stuttgart: Ulmer; 2003.
  5. Vinogradova YuK, Mayorov SR, Khorun LV. Chernaya kniga flory Srednei Rossii. Chuzherodnye vidy rastenii v ekosistemakh Srednei Rossii [Black book of flora of Central Russia. Alien plants in ecosystems of Central Russia]. Moscow: GEOS; 2010. 505 p. Russian.
  6. Dubovik DV, Saulov AO. [North American species of the genus Solidago L. (Asteraceae) in the flora of Belarus]. In: Parfenov VI, Laman NA, editors. Botanika (issledovaniya). Vypusk 46 [Botany (research). Issue 46]. Minsk: Institut eksperimental’noi botaniki NAN Belarusi; 2017. p. 18–26. Russian.
  7. Weber E. Morphological variation of the introduced perennial Solidago canadensis L. sensu lato (Asteraceae) in Europe. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 1997;123(3):197–210. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1997.tb01413.x.
  8. Weber E. Biological flora of Central Europe: Solidago altissima L. Flora. 2000;195(2):123–134. DOI: 10.1016/S0367-2530(17) 30960-X.
  9. Verloove F, Zonneveld BJM, Semple JC. First evidence for the presence of invasive Solidago altissima (Asteraceae) in Europe. Willdenowia. 2017;47(1):69 –75. DOI: 10.3372/wi.47.47107.
  10. Burrows RL. Goldenrod: Plants with Multipurpose potential. HortTechnology. 2002;12(4):711–716. DOI: 10.21273/HORTTECH.12.4.711.
  11. Scholz H. Eine unbeschriebene anthropogene Goldrute (Solidago) aus Mitteleuropa. Floristische Rundbriefe. 1993;27(1):7–12.
  12. Weber E, Schmid B. Latitudinal population differentiation in two species of Solidago (Asteraceae) introduced into Europe. American Journal of Botany. 1998;85(8):1110 –1121. DOI: 10.2307/2446344.
  13. Stoll P, Egli P, Schmid B. Plant foraging and rhizome growth patterns of Solidago altissima in response to mowing and fertilizer application. Journal of Ecology. 1998;86(2):341–354. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00263.x.
  14. Semple JC, Rahman H, Bvosky S, Sorour MK, Kornobis K, Laphitz RL, et al. A multivariate morphometric study of the Solidago altissima complex and S. canadensis (Asteraceae: Astereae). Phytoneuron. 2015;10:1–31.
  15. Duncan DB. Multiple Range and Multiple F Tests. Biometrics. 1955;11(1):1– 42. DOI: 10.2307/3001478.
  16. Saville DJ. Multiple Comparison Procedures: The Practical Solution. The American Statistician. 1990;44(2):174 –180. DOI: 10.1080/00031305.1990.10475712.
  17. Gray AJ. Do invading species have definable genetic characteristics? Philosophical. Transactions of the Royal Society. B: Biological Sciences. 1986;314(1167):655– 672. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1986.0079.
  18. Arnold ML, Hodges SA. Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 1995;10(2): 67–71. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)88979-X.
  19. Whitham TG, Martinsen GD, Keim P, Floate KD, Dungey HS, Potts BM. Plant hybrid zones affect biodiversity: tools for a genetic‐based understanding of community structure. Ecology. 1999;80(2):416 – 428. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0416:PHZABT]2.0.CO;2.
  20. Ellstrand NC, Schierenbeck KA. Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2000;97(13):7043–7050. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.13.7043.
  21. Vilà M, Weber E, Antonio CMD. Conservation Implications of Invasion by Plant Hybridization. Biological Invasions. 2000; 2(3):207–217. DOI: 10.1023/A:1010003603310.
  22. Prentis PJ, Wilson JRU, Dormontt EE, Richardson DM, Lowe AJ. Adaptive evolution in invasive species. Trends in Plant Science. 2008;13(6):288–294. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.03.004.
  23. Luneva NN, Konechnaya GYu, Smekalova TN, Chukhina IG. [On status of Heracleum sosnowskyi Manden. on the territory of Russian Federation]. Vestnik zashchity rastenii. 2018;3(97):10 –15. Russian.
  24. Satzyperova IF. Borshcheviki flory SSSR – novye kormovye rasteniya: Perspektivy ispol’zovaniya v narodnom khozyaistve [Heracleum species of the USSR – new fodder plants: Prospects for use in the national economy]. Leningrad: Nauka; 1984. 223 p. Russian.
  25. Demidov NM, Satzyperova IF. [Main results of breeding work with species of Heracleum L.]. Rastitel’nye resursy. 1989;25(4): 504 –512. Russian.
  26. Jahodová Š, Trybush S, Pyšek P, Wade M, Karp A. Invasive species of Heracleum in Europe: an insight into genetic relationships and invasion history. Diversity and Distributions. 2007;13(1):99 –114. DOI: 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00305.x.
  27. Rieseberg LH, Kim S-C, Randell RA, Whitney KD, Gross BL, Lexer C, et al. Hybridization and the colonization of novel habitats by annual sunflowers. Genetica. 2007;129(2):149 –165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-006-9011-y.
  28. Bock DG, Kane NC, Ebert DP, Rieseberg LH. Genome skimming reveals the origin of the Jerusalem Artichoke tuber crop species: neither from Jerusalem nor an artichoke. New Phytologist. 2014;201(3):1021–1030. DOI: 10.1111/nph.12560.
  29. Breton C, Kiru SD, Bervillé A, Anushkevich NYu. [Breeding of Jerusalem artichoke with the desired traits for different directions of use: retrospective, approaches, and prospects (review)]. Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya biologiya. 2017;52(5):940 – 951. Russian. DOI: 10.15389/agrobiology.2017.5.940rus.
  30. Gaskin JF, Schaal BA. Hybrid Tamarix widespread in U. S. invasion and undetected in native Asian range. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2002;99(17):11256 –11259. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.132403299.
  31. Moody ML, Les DH. Geographic distribution and genotypic composition of invasive hybrid watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum × M. sibiricum) populations in North America. Biological Invasions. 2007;9(5):559–570. DOI: 10.1007/s10530-006-9058-9.
  32. Grafe SF, Boutin C, Pick FR, Bull RD. A PCR-RFLP method to detect hybridization between the invasive Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) and the native northern watermilfoil (Myriophyllum sibiricum), and its application in Ontario lakes. Botany. 2015;93(2):117–121. DOI: 10.1139/cjb-2014-0135.
Published
2019-10-30
Keywords: Solidago canadensis, Belarus, variability, morphometric analysis
How to Cite
Tikhomirov, V. N., & Ravenskaya, I. A. (2019). Intra- and interpopulation variability of Solidago canadensis L. s. l. in Belarus. Experimental Biology and Biotechnology, 3, 67-78. https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-1722-2019-3-67-78