Phytocenoses of grasses of non-floodplain meadows as vegetative filters for minimizing nitrogen pollution of water bodies: potential use

Authors

  • Aleh I. Rodzkin International Sakharov Environmental Institute, Belarusian State University
  • Andrei A. Butsko International Sakharov Environmental Institute, Belarusian State University

Keywords:

buffer strip, phytocenoses of grasses of watershed meadows, Salix alba, nitrogen, productivity, phytoextraction, eutrophication

Abstract

This article presents the results of an assessment of the phytoextraction capacity of grass communities in non-floodplain meadows within the design of buffer strips used to minimize nitrogen pollution of aquatic ecosystems. The scientific novelty of this study lies in establishing the phytoextraction capacity of grass communities for nitrogen, as well as their impact on the potential for reducing the critical load of eutrophication. Natural phytocenoses are represented by 312 grass associations growing in five plant formations (meadow heathlands (MH), normal dry meadows (NDM), dry temporarily excessively wet meadows (DTEWM), swampy meadows (SM), and peat meadows (PM)). Biological accumulation of the element in the aboveground phytomass of plant associations varies from 50.3 ± 17.1 kg/ha (DTEWM) to 56.4 ± 23.9 kg/ha (NDM). Meadow heathland grass communities have a minimum nitrogen accumulation level of 5.2 ± 2.5 kg/ha. No significant differences in nitrogen accumulation levels were found among the plant communities (NDM, DTEWM, SM, and PM). Within the NDM and SM plant communities, significant differences in the levels of biological accumulation of the element were found among the grass communities. In the plant formations NDM, DTEWM, SM, PM, the nitrogen accumulation capacity of natural meadow phytocenoses is inferior to the accumulation capacity of white willow by 43.2–49.6 %; in the MH formation – 94.8 %. In two grass associations, the phytoextraction capacity significantly exceeds the accumulating capacity of willow. The four grass associations have comparable accumulation capacity values. Meadow heathland phytocenoses have the lowest specific potential for reducing the critical load for eutrophication (0.012·10⁻²–0.033·10⁻² eq. kg PO₄³⁻/m²). Other plant formations have a more significant specific potential, averaging 0.187·10⁻² eq. kg PO₄³⁻/m², ranging from 0.053·10⁻² to 0.528·10⁻² eq. kg PO₄³⁻/m². The research results may be useful in transforming natural landscapes, as well as implementing design solutions related to the design of artificial landscapes used to improve the quality of natural waters and maximize future ecosystem services.

Author Biographies

  • Aleh I. Rodzkin, International Sakharov Environmental Institute, Belarusian State University

    doctor science (biology), full professor; director

  • Andrei A. Butsko, International Sakharov Environmental Institute, Belarusian State University

    PhD (biology), associate professor at the department of energy efficient technologies

References

  1. Melnik EA, editor. Natsional’naya sistema okruzhayushchey sredy v Respublike Belarus’: rezul’taty issledovaniya, 2024 god [National environmental monitoring system in the Republic of Belarus: observation results, 2024]. Minsk: Belhydromet; 2024. 550 p. Russian.
  2. Naumenko MA. Evtrofirovaniye ozer i vodokhranilishch: uchebnoye posobiye [Eutrophication of Lakes and Reservoirs]. Saint Petersburg: Russian State Hydrometeorological University; 2007, 99 p. Russian.
  3. K vodnoy bezopasnosti Belarusi: svod. otchet.[Towards Water Security in Belarus: A Summary Report]. Paris: OECD Publ.; 2020. 93 p. Russian.
  4. Ekologicheskiy doklad po strategicheskoy roli v proyekte «Strategii v oblasti okhrany okruzhayushchey sredy v Respublike Belarus’ na period do 2035 goda» [Environmental report on the strategic environmental assessment of the project «Strategy for Environmental Protection of the Republic of Belarus for the period up to 2035»]. Minsk: Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection; 2021. 221 p. Russian.
  5. Rodzkin AI, Butsko AA. Ekologicheskiye aspekty kontrolya biogennykh elementov i proizvodstva vozobnovlyayemoy biomassy v sel’skokhozyaystvennykh ekosistemakh [Ecological aspects of nutrient control and renewable biomass production in agricultural ecosystems]. Ecological bulletin. 2010;2:117–123. Russian.
  6. Marshall E, Moonen A. Field margins in northern Europe: their functions and interactions with agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2002;89(1/2):5–21.
  7. Borin M, Passoni M, Thiene M, Tempesta T. Multiple functions of buffer strips in farming areas. European Journal of Agronomy. 2010;32(1):103–111.
  8. Dorioz J-M, Wang D, Poulenard J, Trévisan D. The effect of grass buffer strips on phosphorus dynamics – A critical review and synthesis as a basis for application in agricultural landscapes in France. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2006;117(1):4–21.
  9. Hickey MBC, Doran B. A review of the efficiency of buffer strips for the maintenance and enhancement of riparian ecosystems. Water Quality Research Journal of Canada. 2004;39(3):311–317.
  10. Kumwimba MN, Akter S, Li X, Dzakpasu M, Ifon BE, Manirakiza B, Muyembe DK, Zhang Y, Huang J, Guadie A.Nutrient and sediment retention by riparian vegetated buffer strips: Impacts of buffer length, vegetation type, and season. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2024;369(1):135–146.
  11. Hawes E, Smith M. Riparian buffer zones: functions and recommended widths. Yale: Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, 2005. 15 р.
  12. Schmitt TJ, Dosskey MG, Hoagland KD. Filter strip performance and processes for different vegetation, widths, and contaminants. Journal of Environment Quality. 1999;28(5):1479–1489.
  13. Uusi-Kämppä J, Braskerud B, Jansson H, Syversen N, Uusitalo R. Buffer zones and constructed wetlands as filters for agricultural phosphorus. Journal of Environmental Quality. 2000;29(1):151–158.
  14. Cooper JR, Gilliam JW, Jacobs JC. Riparian areas as a control of nonpoint pollutants. Watershed research perspectives. 1986;60(1):166–191.
  15. Vamerali T, Marchiol L, Bandiera M, Fellet G, Dickinson NM, Lucchini P, Mosca G, Zerbi G. Advances in agronomic management of phytoremediation: methods and results from a 10-year study of metal-polluted soils. Italian Journal of Agronomy. 2012;7(e42):323–330.
  16. Mleczek M, Rutkowski P, Rissmann I, Kaczmarek Z, Golinski P, Szentner K, Strażyńska K, Stachowiak A. Biomass productivity and phytoremediation potential of Salix alba and Salix viminalis. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2010;34(9):1410–1418.
  17. McGrath SP, Zhao FJ. Phytoextraction of metals and metalloids from contaminated soils. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 2003;14(3):277–282.
  18. Sanko PM. Yestestvennyye luga Belarusi, ikh kharakteristiki i otsenka [Natural meadows of Belarus their characteristics and assessment]. Minsk: Science and Technology; 1983. 247 р. Russian.
  19. Butsko AA, Rodzkin АI, Pashynski VA. Produktsionnyye kharakteristiki Salix alba i yeye fitoekstraktsionnaya sposobnost’ v otnoshenii azota i fosfora [Production characteristics of Salix alba and its phytoextraction ability in regard to nitrogen and phosphorus]. Vesnik BrU. Series 5. Biology. 2023;2:8–18. Russian.
  20. Butsko A, Rodzkin A, Rakovich V, Markitantov N. Otsenka vliianiia urovnia mineral’nogo pitaniia na morfologicheskie parametry i akkumuliatsiiu biogennykh elementov v biomasse bystrorastushchei ivy [Assessment of the influence of the level of mineral nutrition on the morphological parameters and accumulation of biogenous elements in the biomass of the fast-growing willow]. Journal of Belarusian State University. Ecology. 2021;4:54–64. Russian.
  21. Heijungs R, Guinée J, Huppes G. Environmental life cycle assessment of products: guide and backgrounds. Part 1. Leiden: Centrum voor Milieukunde; 1992. p. 96.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-10

Issue

Section

The Study and Rehabilitation of Ecosystems

How to Cite

[1]
Rodzkin, A. and Butsko, A. 2026. Phytocenoses of grasses of non-floodplain meadows as vegetative filters for minimizing nitrogen pollution of water bodies: potential use. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Ecology. 2 (Aug. 2026), 43–53.