Syntaxonomic diversity of ruderal vegetation along railways in the Minsk region

Authors

  • Snezhana I. Vasiuk V. F. Kuprevich Institute of Experimental Botany of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus
  • Elena Ya. Kulikova Belarusian State University , V. F. Kuprevich Institute of Experimental Botany of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus

Keywords:

ruderal communities, railways, syntaxonomy, synecological optima, Minsk region

Abstract

Railway vegetation is of great interest as a new anthropogenic habitat for grass communities, which spread not only along railway tracks but also along other communication structures. Research in this area is aimed at gaining new knowledge about the diversity and characteristics of plant communities forming along railways, as well as their role in the modern landscape. 
Studying the vegetation cover of railways will make it possible to predict and regulate the spread of introduced, potentially invasive species, with the subsequent development of measures for monitoring and managing adventitious plant species. The aim of the study was to characterize the syntaxonomic diversity of the ruderal vegetation formed along the railways of the Minsk region. Field studies were conducted between 2021 and 2024 using standard geobotanical methods at 15 key sites. Three habitat groups were identified in the study areas: railway tracks, embankments, and right-of-way strips. The t-SNE method and cluster analysis were used to identify and differentiate plant communities. The ecological and floristic classification of vegetation was performed using the Braun-Blanke method. The analysis revealed that the syntaxonomic diversity of ruderal vegetation along railways in the study area is represented by three classes (Sisymbrietea Gutte et Hilbig 1975, Artemisietea vulgaris Lohmeyer et al. in Tx. ex von Rochow 1951 and Epilobietea angustifolii Tx. et Preising ex von Rochow 1951), three orders, three unions, six associations, and two association variants. The developed system of syntaxa allows determining the ecological characteristics and nature of succession of grass communities in different types of railway habitats. Thus, along the railway tracks, under conditions of high anthropogenic pressure, xerophytic communities of the Linario – Brometum tectorum Knapp 1961 association (ass.) are formed, representing the initial stages of restorative succession. Mesophytic communities of the order Agropyretalia intermedio-repentis T. Müller et Görs 1969 
of the class Artemisietea vulgaris (ass. Convolvulo arvensis – Elytrigietum repentis Felföldy 1943, Pastinaco sylvestris – Elytrigietum repentis Ishbirdin in Ishbirdin et al. 1988 and Arrhenathero elatioris – Dactylidetum glomeratae Arepieva 2015) are widespread on embankments and right-of-way strips, representing semi-natural grass phytocenoses. Nitrophytic communities of the class Epilobietea angustifolii (ass. Elytrigio repentis – Aegopodietum podagrariae Tuxen 1967 and Chaerophylletum aromatici Neuhauslova-Novotna et al. 1969) develop on more humid substrates of embankments and right-of-way strips with low environmental disturbance.

Author Biographies

  • Snezhana I. Vasiuk, V. F. Kuprevich Institute of Experimental Botany of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus

    junior researcher at the laboratory of geobotany and vegetation cartography

  • Elena Ya. Kulikova, Belarusian State University, V. F. Kuprevich Institute of Experimental Botany of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus

    PhD (biology), docent; leading researcher at the laboratory of geobotany and vegetation cartographya; associate professor at the department of general ecology and biology teaching methods, faculty of biologyb

References

  1. Senator SA, Nikitin NA, Saksonov SV, Rakov NS. Faktory, opredelyayushchie formirovanie flory zheleznyh dorog [Factors determining the formation of railway flora]. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo centra Rossijskoj akademii nauk. 2012;14(1);261–266. Russian.
  2. Medvedeva IV, Zhigarev TP, Vasilevskaya ZhN, Tarasyuk NV, Yarkovec AI, Letko OV, et al. Belarus v cifrah. Statisticheskij spravochnik [Belarus in figures. Statistical reference book.]. Minsk: Nacional’nyj statisticheskij komitet Respubliki Belarus; 2025. 63 p. Russian.
  3. Husainova SAj. Flora i rastitelnost zheleznodorozhnyh nasypej Kujbyshevskoj i Yuzhno-Ural’skoj zheleznyh dorog (v predelah Respubliki Bashkortostan) [Flora and vegetation of railway embankments of the Kuibyshev and South Ural Railways (within the Republic of Bashkortostan)] [dissertation]. Ufa: [publisher unknown]; 2016. 166 p. Russian.
  4. Babkina SV, Safonova EV, Mutin VA. Transport routes as a factor in the transformation of flora (for the example of the Khabarovsk Territory). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2019;272(2):022223. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/272/2/022223.
  5. Ascensão F, Capinha C. Aliens on the Move: Transportation Networks and Non native Species. Borda-de-Água L, Barrientos R, Beja P, Pereira HM, editors. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017;66–80. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-57496-7_5.
  6. Wrzesień M, Denisow B. Distribution and abundance of bee forage flora across an agricultural landscape – railway embankments vs. road verges. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae. 2016;85(3). DOI: 10.5586/asbp.3509.
  7. Wrzesień M, Jachuła J, Denisow B. Railway embankments – a refuge areas for food flora, and pollinators in agricultural landscape. Journal of Apicultural Science. 2016;60(1);91–110. DOI: 10.1515/jas-2016-0004.
  8. Barinov AV. Analiz flory zheleznyh dorog goroda Moskvy [Analysis of the flora of the railways of the city of Moscow] [dissertation]. Moscow: [publisher unknown]; 2018. 154 p. Russian.
  9. Braun-Blanquet J. Pfanzensoziologie. Grundzuge der Vegetationskunde. New-York: Springer, Verlag; 1964. 888 p.
  10. Hennekens SM, Schaminée JHJ. TURBOVEG, a comprehensive data base management system for vegetation data. Journal Vegetation Science. 2001;12(4);589–591. DOI: 10.2307/3237010.
  11. Tichý L. JUICE, software for vegetation classification. Journal Vegetation Science. 2002;13(3);451–453.
  12. Lapshina ED, Fillipov IV, Ganasevich GN. Low-sedge vegetation of waterlogged bog hollows and fens in the north of Western Siberia. Rastitelnost Rossii [Vegetation of Russia]. 2022;45;3–38. Russian.
  13. Maaten van der L, Hinton G. Visualizing Data using t-SNE. Journal of machine learning research. 2008;9(2605);2579–2605.
  14. Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica. 2001;4(1);1–9.
  15. Eremenko NS. Ruderal’na roslinnіst’ mіsta Krivij Rіg. ІІ. Klas Stellarietea mediae [Ruderal vegetation of the city of Kryvyi Rih. II. Class Stellarietea mediae]. Ukrainski Botanicheski Zhurnal. 2018;75(4);356–372. Ukrainian.
  16. Chytrý M, Tichý L, Holt J, Botta-Dukat Z. Determination of diagnostic species with statistical fidelity measures. Vegetation Science. 2002;13(1);79–90. DOI: 10.1658/1100-9233(2002)013[0079:DODSWS]2.0.CO;2.
  17. Mucina L, Bueltmann H, Dierben K, Theurillat J-P, Raus T, Čarni A, et al. Vegetation of Europe: hierarchical floristic classification system of vascular plant, bryophyte, lichen, and algal communities. Applied Vegetation Science. 2016;19(1):3–264. DOI: 10.1111/avsc.12257.
  18. Chytrý M, Láníková D, Lososová Z, Sádlo J, Preislerová Z, Kočí M, et al. Vegetace České republiky 2. Ruderální, plevelová, skalní a suťová vegetace. Vegetation of the Czech Republic 2. Ruderal, weed, rock and scree vegetation. Praha: Academia; 2009. 521 p.
  19. Chytrý M, Řezníčková M, Novotný P, Holubová D, Preislerová Z, Attorre F, et al. FloraVeg. An online database of European vegetation, habitats and flora. Applied Vegetation Science. 2024;27(3):e12798. DOI: 10.1111/avsc.12798.
  20. Arepieva LA. Sinantropnaya rastitel’nost’ g. Kurska [Sinanthropic vegetation of Kursk]. Kursk: Kurskij gosudarstvennyj universitet; 2015. 204 p. Russian.
  21. Bulohov AD, Ivenkova IM, Panasenko NN. Antropogennaya rastitel’nost’ Bryanskoj oblasti [Anthropogenic vegetation of the Bryansk region]. Bryansk: RISO BGU; 2020. 309 p. Russian.
  22. Bulohov AD. Soobshchestva klassa Sedo-Scleranhetea Br.-Bl. 1955 v pojme reki Desny [Communities of the Sedo-Scleranhetea Br.-Bl. 1955 class in the Desna River floodplain]. Raznoobrazie rastitel’nogo mira. 2019;3(2);55–56. Russian.
  23. Kulikova EYa. Sintaksonomicheskaya struktura i tekhnogennoe zagryaznenie travyanistoj rastitel’nosti g. Minska [Syntaxonomic structure and technogenic pollution of herbaceous vegetation in Minsk] [dissertation]. Minsk: [publisher unknown]; 2012. 253 p. Russian.
  24. Dubina DV, Dzyuba TP, Єmel’yanova SM, Bagrіkova NO, Borisova OV, Borsukov LM, et al. Prodromus roslinnostі Ukraїni [Prodromus of the vegetation of Ukraine]. Kiїv: Naukova dumka; 2019. 738 p. Ukrainian.
  25. Velev N. Arrhenatheretalia elatioris uncritical checklist of Europe. Phytologia balcanica. 2018;24(1);99–147.
  26. Euro+Med 2006+ [continuously updated]: Euro+Med PlantBase / the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity [Internet, cite 25 August 2025]. Available from: https://europlusmed.org/.
  27. Cherepanov SK. Sosudistye rasteniya Rossii i sopredel’nyh gosudarstv (v predelah byvshego SSSR) [Vascular plants of Russia and neighboring countries (within the former USSR)]. Saint Petersburg: Mir i sem’ya-95; 1992. 992 p. Russian.
  28. Ellenberg H. Zeigerwerte der Gefasspflanzen Mitteleuropas. Gottingen: Goltze; 1974. 97 p.
  29. Tichý L, Axmanová I, Dengler J, Guarino R, Jansen F, Midolo G, et al. Ellenberg‐type indicator values for European vascular plant species. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2023;34(1):e13168. DOI: 10.1111/jvs.13168.
  30. Nazarov M, Šibik J, Genova B, Velev N, Gacheva G, Georgiev S, et al. Contribution to the knowledge of class Sisymbrietea Gutte et Hilbig 1975 in Bulgaria through newly established synanthropic associations. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 2024;30(1);3–10.
  31. Elias P, Dítě Z, Dítě D, Eliašová M. Distribution and ecology of the genus Bassia in Slovakia 2: Bassia laniflora (S. G. Gmel.) A. J. Scott. Thaiszia – journal of botany. 2016; 26(2);125–138. DOI: 10.1658/1100-9233(2002)013[0079:DODSWS]2.0.CO;2.
  32. Šilk S, Košir P. Synanthropic vegetation of the city of Kranj (Central Slovenia). Hacquetia. 2006;5/1;213–231.
  33. Arepieva LA. To the syntaxonomy of anthropogenic vegetation of the city of Minsk (Republic of Belarus). Rastitelnost Rossii [Vegetation of Russia]. 2024;3(22);33–50. Russian.
  34. Bagrikova NA. Izuchenie sinantropnoj rastitel’nosti Krymskogo poluostrova s pozicij ekologo-floristicheskogo podhoda [Study of synanthropic vegetation on the Crimean Peninsula from an ecological and floristic perspective.]. Sbornik nauchnyh trudov GNBS. 2016;143;25–58. Russian.
  35. Arepieva LA. O soobshchestvakh pozdnikh suktsesionnykh stadii ruderal’noi rastitel’nosti na urbanizirovannykh territoriya Kurskoi oblasti [On communities of later succession stages of ruderal vegetation in urban territories of Kursk region]. Vegetation of Russia. 2012;21;13–24. Russian.
  36. Tabašević M, Jovanović S, Lakusic D, Vukojicic S, Kuzmanovic N. Diversity of Ruderal Communities in Urban Environment. A Case Study from Serbia (SE Europe). Diversity. 2021;13(12):638. DOI: 10.3390/d13120638.
  37. Golovanov YaM, Petrov SS, Abramova LM. Rastitel’nost’ goroda Salavata (respublika Bashkortostan). V. Estestvennaya i poluestestvennaya travyanaya rastitel’nost’ (klassy Molinio-Arrhenatheretea, Festuco-Brometea i Thero-Salicornietea) [Vegetation of Salavat town (Bashkortostan Republic). V. Native and semi-native herb vegetation (classes Molinio-Arrhenatheretea, Festuco-Brometea and Thero-Salicornietea)]. Vegetation of Russia. 2012;24;13–37. Russian.
  38. Kovzik NA. Sinantropnaya flora antropogennyh landshaftov goroda Gomelya [Synanthropic flora of anthropogenic landscapes in the city of Gomel]. Vestnik Priamurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. Sholom-Alejhema. 2020;3(40);41–45. Russian.
  39. Kulikova EYa. Sintaksonomiya i ekologo-floristicheskaya harakteristika sinantropnoj rastitel’nosti g. Minska [Syntaxonomy and ecological-floristic characteristics of synanthropic vegetation in Minsk]. Vesci nacyyanal’nyj akademii navuk Belarusi. Seriya: Biyalagichnyya navuki. 2010;2;13–18. Russian.
  40. Shavalda ES, Golovanov YaM. Sintaksonomiya pridorozhnoj rastitel’nosti goroda Minska i Minskoj oblasti (Respublika Belarus) [Syntaxonomy of roadside vegetation in the city of Minsk and the Minsk region (Republic of Belarus)]. Fitoraznoobrazie Vostochnoj Evropy. 2024;18(4);234–250. Russian.
  41. Arepieva LA. Sinantropnye soobshchestva s Dactylis glomerata L. v Kurskoi oblasti. [Synanthropic communities with Dactylis glomerata L. in the Kursk region]. Vegetation of Russia. 2018;21;3–18. Russian.
  42. Frank D, Klotz S, Westhus W. Biologisch-Ökologische Daten zur Flora der DDR. Wissenschaftliche Beiträge der Martin-LutherUniversität Halle-Wittenberg. 41;1988:170. Grull P. Chaerophylletum aromatici (TüxEN 1967) Neuh. Z., Neuh. R. et Hejny 1969 im Moravsky kras (Mährischer Karst).
  43. Preslia. 1974;46;350–358.
  44. Otte A, Ludwig T. Chaerophylletum aromatici Neuhá., Neuh. et Hejný 1969 – eine ruderale Hochstaudengesellschaft am Goldenen Steig im südöstlichen Bayerischen Wald. Tuexenia. 1989;9;107–120.
  45. Dubina DV, Dziuba TP, Iemelianova SM. Ruderal vegetation of Ukraine: classes Galio-Urticetea Passarge ex Kopecký 1969 and Bidentetea R.Tx. et al. ex von Rochow 1951. Biodivercity Research and Conservation. 2024; 73;23–57.
  46. Tokaryuk A, Chorney I, Korzhan K, Budzhak V, Velychko M, Protopopova VV, et al. The participation of invasive plants in the synanthropic plant communities in the Bukovinian Cis-Carpathian (Ukraine). Thaiszia – journal of botany. 2012;22(2);243–254. Kopecký K. Der Apophytisierungsprozeß am Beispiel der Saumgesellschaften mit Chaerophyllum aromaticum L. in der Tschechoslowakei. Folia geobotanica & phytotaxonomica. 1984;19;129–130.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-12

Issue

No. 4 (2025): ЖУРНАЛ БЕЛОРУССКОГО ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА ЭКОЛОГИЯ

Section

The Study and Rehabilitation of Ecosystems

How to Cite

[1]
Vasiuk, S. and Kulikova, E. 2026. Syntaxonomic diversity of ruderal vegetation along railways in the Minsk region. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Ecology. 4 (Jan. 2026), 18–34.