Pollutant accumulation in ecosystem components within the zone of influence of cement production in the Ararat valley

Authors

  • Tigran M. Astabatsyan International Sakharov Environmental Institute, Belarusian State University
  • Marina M. Zafranskaya Research Institute of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Belarusian State Medical University
  • Natalia S. Tadevosyan Yerevan State Medical University after Mkhitar Heratsi
  • Yeva O. Chichoyan Human Reproduction Center

Keywords:

cement production, heavy metal, atmospheric deposition, soil contamination, bioaccumulation, Ararat Valley, dust load

Abstract

Atmospheric dust pollution is a primary manifestation of technogenic pressure of cement plants on adjacent ecosystems. Despite a substantial body of research on individual environmental components in areas affected by cement production, comprehensive studies simultaneously covering abiotic and biotic ecosystem components in the zone of influence of specific plants in the South Caucasus remain scarce. The aim of this study was to assess the spatial patterns of distribution and accumulation of technogenic pollutants in abiotic and biotic ecosystem components within the zone of influence of the Araratcement cement plant (Ararat Valley, Armenia). A comprehensive analysis of pollutant concentrations was carried out in atmospheric deposition, topsoil (0–10 cm), leaves of woody plants (Prunus armeniaca L., Morus alba L.), and surface water and groundwater. Sampling was conducted along radial transects from the industrial site, taking into account the prevailing wind directions. A pronounced aerosol load gradient was identified: the median dust deposition rate at 0.3 km from the source was 168 mg/(m2*day), decreasing to 84 mg/(m2*day) at 3 km (p = 0.008). Pb and Cr concentrations in 
dust from the near zone exceeded control-site values by a factor of 2.1 (p = 0.008). PM10 (52 µg/m3) and PM2.5 (21 µg/m3) concentrations at the impact site (0.7 km) exceeded WHO recommended daily levels by factors of 1.16 and 1.4, respectively, whereas SO2 and NO2 concentrations remained below WHO guidelines, indicating a predominantly particulate nature of contamination. In the impact zone soils (0.5 km), Pb (18.2 mg/kg) and Cd (0.42 mg/kg) concentrations exceeded local control-site values (2 km) by factors of 1.86 and 2.0, respectively (p = 0.008), while remaining below the approximate permissible concentrations. A statistically significant alkaline shift of soil pH by 0.40 units (p = 0.008) was recorded, attributed to the deposition of calcium carbonate and hydroxide with cement dust. Local contrast coefficients were 1.86 for Pb and 2.00 for Cd; the integral PLIcontrol index was 1.93, characterizing a moderately expressed multielement contrast. Pb content in leaves of P. armeniaca (4.2 mg/kg) and M. alba (3.4 mg/kg) was in the upper part of the comparison range used; Ca content exceeded 11 g/kg, which is considered a characteristic marker of cement pollution. The leaf-to-soil ratio BCFleaf was 0.231 for P. armeniaca and 0.187 for M. alba, quantitatively characterizing the integrated leaf Pb load. Surface water exhibited higher Pb concentrations (6.2 µg/L) compared to groundwater (4.1 µg/L, p = 0.016), elevated TDS (512 mg/L) and pH (7.50), though all parameters remained below WHO guideline values. The consistency of spatial pollution 
gradients in all studied media proves the expediency of applying a comprehensive approach to the bioindicative assessment of territories adjacent to cement industry enterprises.

Author Biographies

  • Tigran M. Astabatsyan, International Sakharov Environmental Institute, Belarusian State University

    postgraduate student, faculty of environmental medicine

  • Marina M. Zafranskaya, Research Institute of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Belarusian State Medical University

    doctor of science (medicine), full professor; chief researcher

  • Natalia S. Tadevosyan, Yerevan State Medical University after Mkhitar Heratsi

    doctor of science (medicine); researcher at the laboratory of environmental hygiene and toxicology

  • Yeva O. Chichoyan, Human Reproduction Center

    researcher at the center of human reproduction

References

  1. Fay M. P., Proschan M. A. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney or t-test? On assumptions for hypothesis tests and multiple interpretations of decision rules // Statistics Surveys. 2010. Т. 4. P. 1–39.
  2. Zerrouqi Z., Sbaa M., Oujidi M., Elhouadi B. Assessment of cement's dust impact on the soil using principal component analysis and GIS // International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2008. V. 5. № 1. P. 125–134.
  3. Al-Khashman O. A., Shawabkeh R. A. Metals distribution in soils around the cement factory in southern Jordan // Environmental Pollution. 2006. Т. 140. № 3. С. 387–394.
  4. WHO global air quality guidelines: particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. 273 с.
  5. Asubiojo O. I., Aina P. O., Oluwole A. F. [et al.]. Effects of cement production on the elemental composition of soils in the neighbourhood of two cement factories // Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. 1991. V. 57. P. 819–828.
  6. Sutherland R. A. Bed sediment-associated trace metals in an urban stream, Oahu, Hawaii // Environmental Geology. 2000. V. 39. № 6. P. 611–627.
  7. Tomlinson D. L., Wilson J. G., Harris C. R., Jeffrey D. W. Problems in the assessment of heavy-metal levels in estuaries and the formation of a pollution index // Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen. 1980. V. 33. P. 566–575.
  8. ТКП 17.03-06-2019. «Охрана окружающей среды и природопользование. Земли. Порядок выполнения работ по дифференцированному нормированию содержания химических веществ в землях (включая почвы.
  9. Nanos G. D., Ilias I. F. Effects of cement dust on olive (Olea europaea L.) leaf physiology and biochemistry // Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2007. V. 60. № 2. P. 212–220.
  10. Baker A. J. M. Accumulators and excluders-strategies in the response of plants to heavy metals // Journal of Plant Nutrition. 1981. V. 3. № 1-4. P. 643–654.
  11. Guidelines for drinking-water quality: fourth edition incorporating the first and second addenda. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. 614 p.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-11

Issue

Section

Applied ecology (medical ecology, industrial ecology, agrarian ecology, forestry ecology, water management ecology, etc.)

How to Cite

[1]
Astabatsyan, T.M. et al. 2026. Pollutant accumulation in ecosystem components within the zone of influence of cement production in the Ararat valley. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Ecology. 3 (Nov. 2026).