Application of mathematical simulation of X-ray radiography procedure to development of diagnostic reference levels

  • Victor F. Minenko
  • Kiryl A. Viarenich

Abstract

Entrance surface dose at patient skin during X-ray radiography was studied. This quantity is used for determination of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). These levels are the main tool for optimisation of radiation protection of patients. Objective: show the possibility of computer simulation of diagnostic exposure for determination of DRLs for standard chest X-ray in anteroposterior projection. Materials and methods: X-ray spectrum was calculated using «SpekPy» computer
software; X-ray transport was simulated using Monte-Carlo method and voxel anthropomorphic phantom. Focal sport of the X-ray tube was modelled with point source. Rectangular field of the radiation beam was formed by lead curtains. esults: entrance surface dose on the patient’s skin, backscatter factor and dose on the surface of image receptor were calculated for various combinations of exposure parameters (X-ray tube voltage, focus-surface distance, field size). Linear dependence of entrance surface dose and X-ray tube output on square of X-ray tube anode voltage was found. The dependence, which we found, allows calculation of these quantities for anode voltage different from the value at which the X-ray tube output was measured. Optimal radiation parameters were found, under which the entrance surface dose would not be exceeded. It was also found that entrance surface doses do not have strong dependence on the radiation field size for chest X-ray. Conclusion: optimal settings of exposure can be made based on diagnostic reference levels before the exposure. It can be facilitated by using a computer program with a database of entrance surface dose values, which were calculated using computer simulation in advance. Entrance surface dose can be calculated based on backscatter factor and measurements of X-ray tube output.

References

  1. Patient Dosimetry for X Rays Used in Medical Imaging. Journal of the ICRU. 2005;5(2):1–113. Doi:10.1093/jicru_ndi016.
  2. Valentin J. Radiation and your patient: A guide for medical practitioners: ICRP Supporting Guidance 2: Approved by ICRP Committee 3 in September 2001. Annals of the ICRP. 2001;31(4):1–52. Doi:10.1016/S0146-6453(02)00007-6.
  3. Vañó E, Miller DL, Martin CJ, et al. ICRP Publication 135: Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging. Annals of the ICRP. 2017;46(1):1–144. Doi:10.1177/0146645317717209.
  4. Radiological protection and safety in medicine. Annals of the ICRP. 1996;26(2):1–31. Doi:10.1016/S0146-6453(00)89195-2.
  5. Vodovatov AV. Practical implementation of the diagnostic reference levels concept for the common radiographic examinations. Radiacionnaja gigiena [Radiation Hygiene]. 2017;10(1):47–55. Russian.
  6. Menzel HG, Clement C, DeLuca P. ICRP Publication 110. Realistic reference phantoms: an ICRP/ICRU joint effort. A report of adult reference computational phantoms. Annals of the ICRP. 2009;39(2):1–164. Doi:10.1016/j.icrp.2009.09.001.
  7. Omrane LB, Verhaegen F, Chahed N, Mtimet S. An investigation of entrance surface dose calculations for diagnostic radiology using Monte Carlo simulations and radiotherapy dosimetry formalisms. Physics in Medicine & Biology. 2003;48(12):1809–24.
  8. Kramer R, Khoury HJ, Vieira JW. CALDose_X—a software tool for the assessment of organ and tissue absorbed doses, effective dose and cancer risks in diagnostic radiology. Physics in Medicine & Biology. 2008;53(22):6437–59.
  9. Miró R, Soler J, Gallardo S, Campayo JM, Díez S, Verdú G. MCNP simulation of a Theratron 780 radiotherapy unit. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2005;116(1–4):65–8.
  10. Poludniowski G, Omar A, Bujila R, Andreo P. Technical Note: SpekPy v2.0 – a software toolkit for modeling x‐ray tube spectra. Medical Physics. 2021;48(7):3630–7.
  11. Toivonen M. Patient Dosimetry Protocols in Digital and Interventional Radiology. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2001;94(1):105–8.
  12. Boone JM, Seibert JA. An accurate method for computer-generating tungsten anode x-ray spectra from 30 to 140 kV. Medical Physics. 1997;24(11):1661–70.
  13. Kishkovskii AN, Tyutin LA, Esinovskaya GN. Atlas ukladok pri rentgenologicheskih issledovanijah [Atlas of placements during X-ray radiography examinations]. Leningrad: Meditsina; 1987. 519 p. Russian.
  14. Kothan S, Tungjai M. An Estimation of X-Radiation Output using Mathematic Model. American Journal of Applied Sciences [Internet, cited 2023 February 6]. URL: https://thescipub.com/abstract/ajassp.2011.923.926
  15. Petoussi-Henss N, Zankl M, Drexler G, Panzer W, Regulla D. Calculation of backscatter factors for diagnostic radiology using Monte Carlo methods. Physics in Medicine & Biology. 1998;43(8):2237–50.
  16. Verenich KA, Minenko VF, Kuten SA. Computer program for rapid estimation of patients’ radiation doses in diagnostic radiography. Zdorov’e i okruzhajushhaja sreda [Health and environment]. 2019:29; 27–30. Russian.
  17. Annex B and All references. Annals of the ICRP. 2007;37(2–4):247–332. Doi:10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.010.
Published
2023-11-08
Keywords: entrance surface dose, X-ray radiation, diagnostic radiography, Monte-Carlo method, computational phantom
How to Cite
Minenko, V., & Viarenich, K. (2023). Application of mathematical simulation of X-ray radiography procedure to development of diagnostic reference levels. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Ecology, 3. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/ecology/article/view/5934
Issue
No 3 (2023): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Ecology.
Section
Radioecology and Radiobiology, Radiation Safety