Misesian analysis of socialism: 100 years of correctness
Keywords:
L. von Mises, institutions, socialism, plan, market, economic calculationAbstract
The article is devoted to the centenary of the publication of L. von Mises’ treatise «Socialism: an economic and sociological analysis», the significance of which lies in the study of the economic, political and ethical aspects of a socialist society. Emphasis is placed on the fact that L. von Mises derived an argument about the rational impossibility of the economic system of socialism from the main institutional provisions of this ideology (the abolition of private property of the means of production, the absence of a market as a mechanism for coordination and entrepreneurship), without which it is impossible to organise a full-fledged exchange of goods of a higher order and, consequently, obtain relevant market prices that carry information about the scarcity of goods and the most efficient methods of their production. In the absence of such information, the planning body is unable to determine the goods necessary for production. The analysis carried out by L. von Mises is not aimed exclusively at the form of socialism that was being realised at that time in Soviet Russia, but can be applied to any pseudo-socialist system or form of destructionism (from price regulation to compulsory unemployment insurance). The scientist demonstrated that political democracy, as a tool for non-violent change of power, corresponds to the system of private property, and under socialism it turns into authoritarianism.
References
- von Mises L. Socialism: an economic and sociological analysis. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund; 1981. 426 p. Russian edition: fon Mizes L. Sotsializm: ekonomicheskii i sotsiologicheskii analiz. Pinsker B, translator. Мoscow: Catallaxy; 1994. 416 p.
- Kavaliou AV. Socialist calculation debates: a contemporary understanding. Vestnik BNTU. 2008;2:52–60. Russian.
- King B, Petty R. The rise of technosocialism: how inequality, AI and climate will usher in a new world. Rye Brook: Marshall Cavendish International; 2021. 377 p.
- Ebeling RM. Socialism-in-practice was a nightmare, not utopia: Ludwig von Mises’s critique of central planning and the fall of the Soviet Union. The Review of Austrian Economics. 2021;34(4):431–448. DOI: 10.1007/s11138-021-00545-w.
- Hülsmann JG. Mises: the last knight of liberalism. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute; 2007. 1143 p. Russian edition: Khyul’smann IG. Poslednii rytsar’ liberalizma: zhizn’ i idei Lyudviga fon Mizesa. Kuryaev A, translator. Moscow: Sotsium; 2013. 876 p.
- von Mises L. Die Wirtschaftsrechnung im sozialistischen Gemeinwesen. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik. 1920;47:86–121.
- Salerno J. Ludwig von Mises as social rationalist. The Review of Austrian Economics. 1990;4:26–54.
- Kavaliou A. Mises’ monetary argument in socialist calculation debate: cross the Ts and dot the Is. Procesos de Mercado. Revista Europea de Economía Política. 2018;15(1):95–118. DOI: 10.52195/pm.v15i1.62.
- Huerta de Soto J. Socialism, economic calculation, and entrepreneurship. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publisher; 2010. 310 p. Russian edition: Uerta de Soto Kh. Sotsializm, ekonomicheskii raschet i predprinimatel’skaya funktsiya. Koshkin V, translator. Moscow: Irisen; 2008. 486 p.
- Kavaliou AV. Price crises in Soviet Economy 1920s and institutional effects of the fundamental impossibility of socialism. Journal of Institutional Studies. 2021;13(2):68–81. Russian. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2021.13.2.068-081.
- Phelps E. Mass flourishing: how grassroots innovation created jobs, challenge, and change. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2013. 378 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)