Mathematical modelling of integration effects using the example of the EAEU

Authors

  • Catherine G. Gospodarik Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus; Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 49 Leningradskii Avenue, Moscow 125167, Russia
  • Mikhail M. Kovalev Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

Keywords:

economic integration, efficiency of unification, econometric model, gravitational model of trade, Leontief model, data envelopment model (model DEA), Eurasian Economic Union, European Union, Association of Southeast Asian Nations, composite indices, economic growth

Abstract

The article analyses and develops the mathematical apparatus for measuring the effectiveness of regional and global economic integration. Various models for calculating the effects of integration are considered: models of global integration, models of composite indices for measuring the degree of economic integration in the association, models of the significance of the integration association in the world, interregional integration models based on input – output model (V. V. Leontief), models of collective economic security of the integration association, gravitational models of mutual trade, econometric models of economic growth of countries taking into account integration effects, regression models of the impact of economic integration on GDP growth, models for assessing the impact of integration on the growth of aggregate factor productivity. The author’s system of models for comparative analysis of the dynamics of the speed of integration of countries into a regional association is introduced. A data envelopment model (model DEA) is proposed to measure the comparative evaluation of integration efficiency. Attention is focused on the selection of indicators for assessing the effects for the combined economic systems and assessing the significance of the integration association in the world.

Author Biographies

  • Catherine G. Gospodarik, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus; Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, 49 Leningradskii Avenue, Moscow 125167, Russia

    PhD (economics), docent; head of the department of analytical economics and econometrics, faculty of economics, Belarusian State University, and professor at the department of business analysis, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

  • Mikhail M. Kovalev, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    doctor of science (physics and mathematics), full professor; professor at the department of analytical economics and econometrics, faculty of economics

References

  1. Balassa B. The theory of economic integration. London: [s. n.]; 1962. 318 p.
  2. Tinbergen J. International economic integration. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1954. 191 p.
  3. Kireev AP, editor. Mezhdunarodnaya ekonomika [International economics]. Moscow: Teis; 2006. 720 p. (Vekhi ekonomicheskoi mysli; volume 6). Russian.
  4. Kireev AP. Mezhdunarodnaya ekonomika [International economics]. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya; 2014. 592 p. Russian.
  5. Kuzmina TI, Savina NP. Methodological approach to evaluating the effectiveness of economic integration of CIS member states. RGGU Bulletin. Series: Economics. Management. Law. 2019;4:78–91. Russian. DOI: 10.28995/2073-6304-2019-4-78-91.
  6. Vinokurova EYu, editor. Sistema indikatorov evraziiskoi integratsii II. Doklad № 22 [System of indicators of Eurasian integration II. Report No. 22]. Saint Petersburg: Centre for Integration Studies of the Eurasian Development Bank; 2014. 110 p. Russian.
  7. Eurasian Development Bank. Kompleksnaya otsenka makroekonomicheskogo effekta razlichnykh form glubokogo ekonomicheskogo sotrudnichestva Ukrainy so stranami Tamozhennogo soyuza i Edinogo ekonomicheskogo prostranstva v ramkakh EvrAzES [A comprehensive assessment of the macroeconomic effect of various forms of deep economic cooperation between Ukraine and the countries of the Customs Union and the Common Economic Space within the framework of the EAEU]. Saint Petersburg: Centre for Integration Studies of the Eurasian Development Bank; 2012. 168 p. Russian.
  8. European Economic Commission. The system of integration indicators as a tool for analysing the functioning of regional integration associations [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 February 15]; 91 p. Available from: https://eec.eaeunion.org/upload/medialibrary/b81/Indikatory-integratsii-2019.pdf. Russian.
  9. Golovenchik GG. Tsifrovaya transformatsiya belorusskoi ekonomiki v usloviyakh tsifrovoi globalizatsii [Digital transformation of the Belarusian economy in the conditions of digital globalization]. Minsk: IVTs Minfina; 2022. 376 p. Russian.
  10. Bo Chen, Yuen Pau Woo. Veasuring economic integration in the Asia-Pacific region: a principal components approach. Asian Economic Papers. 2010;9:121–143.
  11. Dennis DJ, Zainal Aznam Yusof. Developing indicators of ASEAN integration. A preliminary survey for a road map [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2023 January 25]. Available from: http://aadcp2.org/file/02-001-Final-Report.pdf.
  12. Nardoi M, Saisanai M, Saltellii A, Tarantolai S, Hoffmanii A, Giovanninii E. Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2005. 108 p. (OECD statistics working papers; No. 2005/03). DOI: 10.1787/533411815016.
  13. Andronova IV, Belova IN, Ganeeva MV. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost’ EAES [Economic security of the EAEU]. Moscow: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia; 2020. 427 p. Russian.
  14. Gospodarik CG, Maenova ES. Econometric gravity models of mutual trade of the EAEU countries. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Economics. 2021;2:77–91. Russian.
  15. Shved AV. The gravity model of international trade: theory and practice of application. Ekonomicheskii byulleten’. 2020;10:14–23. Russian.
  16. Ginoyan AB, Tkachenko AA. EAEU countries foreign trade policy: results of simulation modeling. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2022;26(2):175–189. Russian. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2022-26-2-175-189.
  17. Gospodarik CG, Kovalev MM. EAES-2050: global’nye trendy i evraziiskaya ekonomicheskaya politika [The EAEU-2050: global trends and Eurasian economics policy]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2015. 152 p. Russian.
  18. Muhammad Ibrahim Shah. Investigating the role of regional economic integration on growth: fresh insights from South Asia. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies. 2021;13(1):35–57. DOI: 10.1177/0974910120974800.
  19. Badinger H. Growth effect of economic integration: the case of the EU member state (1950–2000) [Internet]. 2001 [cited 2023 January 25]. 45 p. (IEF working paper; No. 40). Available from: https://research.wu.ac.at/ws/portalfiles/portal/37337573/document.pdf.
  20. Jeong Yeon Lee, Doyeon Kim. Different models for regional integration: lessons from total factor productivity in Europe. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute; 2013. 31 p. (ADBI working paper; No. 452).
  21. Jovanovic MN. The economics of international integration. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2015. 736 p.
  22. Gospodarik CG, Kovalev MM. Collective economic security of the EAEU: statement of the problem, indicators, consolidated index. Belarusian Economic Journal. 2022;2:23–33. Russian. DOI: 10.46782/1818-4510-2022-2-23-33.
  23. Glazatova MK, Agadzhanyan SS, Amirbekova AS, Akhveryan DN, Badadyan GZ, Barsegyan AS, et al. Otsenka integratsionnykh protsessov EAES v sfere torgovli: 2022 [Assessment of the integration processes of the EAEU in the field of trade: 2022]. Moscow: Higher School of Economics; 2022. 64 p. Russian.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2023-05-28

Issue

Section

C. Mathematical and Quantitative Methods

How to Cite

[1]
Gospodarik, C.G. and Kovalev, M.M. 2023. Mathematical modelling of integration effects using the example of the EAEU. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Economics. 1 (May 2023), 36–50.