The integration management of science and industry: essence, backgrounds and main trends
Keywords:
science development, industry development, integrated development, influencing factors analysis, innovation economy, international investment, government policyAbstract
The integration of science and industry is crucial for fostering an innovation-driven economy, accelerating technological advancements, and ensuring sustainable growth. Understanding of the factors influencing this integration is essential for strategic decision-making. This study analyses panel data from 31 Chinese provinces in 2011– 2022. We employ the entropy-weighted model and the coupling coordination model to comprehensively assess the level of science – industry integration in China. Additionally, a two-way fixed-effects panel quantile model examines the impact of inward and outward foreign direct investment, public transportation infrastructure, healthcare service capacity, and urbanisation rates on integration. The findings indicate a measurable increase in science – industry coordination in China, particularly in the eastern regions, where policy support and investment have driven advancements in technology transfer and innovation capacity. Foreign direct investment and public transportation expansion significantly enhance integration, while urbanisation’s influence varies, showing stronger effects in highly industrialised areas. Additionally, outward foreign investment becomes a key driver at later development stages, highlighting the role of international collaboration. These insights provide valuable guidance for developing strategies to strengthen science-industry interactions, not only in China but also in other countries aiming for innovation-driven growth. The research underscores the need for targeted government policies, strategic international investments, and infrastructure expansion to foster deeper science – industry integration, ultimately driving technological progress and economic competitiveness.
References
- Ankrah S, Al-Tabbaa O. Universities – industry collaboration: a systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 2015;31(3):387– 408. DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003.
- Rajalo S, Vadi M. University – industry innovation collaboration: reconceptualization. Technovation. 2017;62– 63:42–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2017.04.003.
- Yanwei Wang, Yuhan Jiang, Shuxue Tian,Yu Zheng, Shihang Zhou, Shuhua Cheng. Research on the four collaborative innovation mechanisms of industry – education integration based on the concept of community. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation. 2023;5(4):20 –33. DOI: 10.16209/j.cnki.cust.2022.04.007.
- Yang Chen, Weiwei Li, Pingtao Yi. Evaluation of city innovation capability using the TOPSIS-based order relation method: the case of Liaoning Province, China. Technology in Society. 2020;63:101330. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101330.
- Liu Dan, Wang Xue, Zhang Shenghyi. Research on the industrial development level of various regions in Xinjiang based on factor analysis. Xinjiang zhixue daxue xuebao. 2016;1:21–24. Chinese.
- Kleszcz A. Principal components of innovation performance in European Union countries. The Polish Statistician. 2021;66(8):24 – 45. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.2305.
- Pegkas P, Staikouras C, Tsamadias C. Does research and development expenditure impact innovation? Evidence from the European Union countries. Journal of Policy Modeling. 2019;41(5):1005–1025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2019.07.001.
- Ben Youssef A, Boubaker S, Omri A. Entrepreneurship and sustainability: the need for innovative and institutional solutions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2018;129:232–241. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.003.
- Xue Baoqi. The spatiotemporal pattern and influencing factors of urban innovation capability in the Yellow River Basin. Zhongguo shamo. 2022;6:116 –124. Chinese.
- Zhang Yongkai, Bi Xiaomei, Yang Chunyue. Analysis on industrial green development efficiency and its influencing factors in nine provinces (regions) along the Yellow River. Hebei shifan daxue xuebao (ziran kexue ban). 2024;2:181–193. Chinese.
- Liu Zhixiong, Lu Yang. An empirical study on the factors affecting the high-quality development of Guangxi industry. Yulin shifan xueyuan xuebao. 2019;4:34 – 41. Chinese.
- Furman JL, MacGarvie MJ. Academic science and the birth of industrial research laboratories in the US pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2007;63(4):756–776. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2006.05.014.
- Zhu Guilong, Zhang Yi, Chen Kaihua. The evolution of international research in industry-university-research collaboration. Kexue xue yanjiu. 2015;11:1669 –1686. Chinese.
- Шумилин ИГ, Устинович ИВ. Методологические подходы к разработке институциональных преобразований для формирования и развития научно-промышленного комплекса (на примере Республики Беларусь). Экономика науки. 2024;10(4):63–74. DOI: 10.22394/2410-132X.484.
- Liang Yongmei. China’s century-long exploration of industrial technological progress: process, experience and outlook – a perspective on the century-long struggle of the Communist Party of China. Jingji yu guanli yanjiu. 2021;11:3 –19. Chinese.
- He Jun, Tao Ssiyu. Co-evolution of innovation system and technological capability: 70 years of China’s industrial technological progress. Jingji zongheng. 2019;10:64 –73. Chinese.
- Rossoni AL, de Vasconcellos EPG, de Castilho Rossoni RL. Barriers and facilitators of university – industry collaboration for research, development and innovation: a systematic review. Management Review Quarterly. 2024;74:1841–1877. DOI: 10.1007/s11301-023-00349-1.
- Rybnicek R, Kоnigsgruber R. What makes industry – university collaboration succeed? A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Business Economics. 2019;89:221–250. DOI: 10.1007/s11573-018-0916-6.
- Jing Li, Hong Fang, Siran Fang, Sultana Easmin Siddika. Investigation of the relationship among university – research institute – industry innovations using a coupling coordination degree model. Sustainability. 2018;10(6):1954. DOI: 10.3390/su10061954.
- Zhizhen Cui, Erling Li. Does industry – university – research cooperation matter? An analysis of its coupling effect on regional innovation and economic development. Chinese Geographical Science. 2022;32:915 – 930. DOI: 10.1007/s11769-022-1308-y.
- Wang Haijun, Tian Xiaoran. Dynamic comprehensive evaluation of coupling coordination effect of regional industry-university-research innovation system and analysis of influencing factors. Zhongguo gaoxiao keji. 2023;4:65 –72. Chinese.
- Liang Shaobo, Song Yan, Li Jizu. Evaluation and spatiotemporal evolution of coupling coordination degree of industry-university-research complex system. Xitong kexue xuebao. 2024;32(2):126 –130. Chinese.
- Ali N, Phoungthong K, Khan A, Abbas S, Dilanchiev A, Tariq S, et al. Does FDI foster technological innovations? Empirical evidence from BRICS economies. Plos One. 2023;18(3):e0282498. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282498.
- Thanh Tam Nguyen-Huu, Ngoc-Sang Pham. FDI spillovers, new industry development, and economic growth. Journal of Public Economic Theory. 2024;26(1):e12670. DOI: 10.1111/jpet.12670.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Economics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)