Analysis of methods for determining the total costs of imports for exports using tables «input – output»

Authors

  • Alexey I. Karatkevich Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus
  • Boris V. Lapko Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus
  • Dina V. Shparun Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

Keywords:

import, export, tables «input – output», full cost of imports, full cost coefficients

Abstract

The article analyses the existing methods for determining the full cost of imports for exports, provides a comparative analysis of these methods, and identifies their main advantages and disadvantages. Based on the tables «input – output» of Sweden and Germany for 2018, the article calculates the full cost of imports for exports using the three methods discussed and examines the differences in the resulting values.

Author Biographies

  • Alexey I. Karatkevich, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    doctor of science (economics), full professor; head of the department of banking business and financial technologies, faculty of economics

  • Boris V. Lapko, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    PhD (physics and mathematics), docent; associate professor at the department of banking business and financial technologies, faculty of economics

  • Dina V. Shparun, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    PhD (economics), docent; associate professor at the department of banking business and financial technologies, faculty of economics

References

  1. Hummels D, Ishii J, Kei-Mu Y. The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade. Journal of International Economics. 1999;54(1):75–96.
  2. Koopman R, Wang Z, Wei S-J. How much of Chinese exports is really made in China? Assessing foreign and domestic value-added in gross exports. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2008. 49 p. (NBER working paper; no 14109).
  3. Chen X, Cheng LK, Fung KC, Lau LJ. The estimation of domestic value-added and emploYMent induced by exports: an application to Chinese exports to the United States. Stanford: Stanford University; 2001. 43 p.
  4. Быков АА, Толкачев СА, Пархименко ВА, Шаблинская ТВ. Экономический рост Китая в 2010–2017 годы: анализ с позиций методологии «затраты – выпуск» и современной денежной теории. Финансы: теория и практика. 2021;25(2):166–184. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2021-25-2-166-184.
  5. Короткевич АИ, Лапко БВ. Модификация модели «затраты – выпуск» и ее использование для определения и планирования полных затрат импорта на экспортируемую продукцию. Белорусский экономический журнал. 2015;4:113–125.
  6. Короткевич АИ. Инструментарий определения полных затрат импорта на производство конечного продукта и экспорт. Банкаўскі веснік. 2019;9:44–50. EDN: XJOERX.
  7. Короткевич А, Лапко Б, Гайшун А. Анализ методик определения полных затрат импорта на производство конечного продукта. Банкаўскі веснік. 2022;1:11–17. EDN: KFNBQX.
  8. Стоун Р. Метод «затраты – выпуск» и национальные счета. Москва: Статистика; 1964. 207 с.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

[1]
Karatkevich, A.I. et al. 2025. Analysis of methods for determining the total costs of imports for exports using tables «input – output». Journal of the Belarusian State University. Economics. 2 (Dec. 2025), 53–60.