On quasi-homogeneous production functions with constant elasticity of factors substitution
Abstract
The study of the shape and properties of production functions is a subject of great interest in economic analysis. The class of production functions with constant Hicks elasticity of substitution includes many important production functions in economics; in particular, Cobb – Douglas production function and CES production function. In 2010, L. Losonczi proved that a two-factor homogeneous production function satisfies the constant Hicks elasticity of substitution property if and only if this homogeneous function is either a Cobb – Douglas production function or a CES production function. The similar result for multi-factor homogeneous production functions was proved by B.-Y. Chen in 2012. In this paper we generalize results of L. Losonczi and B.-Y. Chen to the class of quasi-homogeneous two-factor production functions with constant Hicks elasticity of substitution. Namely the notion of quasi-homogeneous two-factor production functions is introduced, relation between the condition of homogeneity and the condition of quasi-homogeneity is established, and the class of quasi-homogeneous two-factor production functions with constant elasticity of factors substitution by Hicks is obtained. Moreover, we pointed out the analytical form for quasi-homogeneous two-factor production functions with unit elasticity of substitution. The obtained results can be applied in modeling of production processes.
References
- Cobb C. W., Douglas P. H. A theory of production. Am. Econ. Rev. 1928. Vol. 18. P. 139–165.
- Douglas P. H. The Cobb-Douglas production function once again: its history, its testing, and some new empirical values. J. Political Econ. 1976. Vol 84, No. 5. P. 903–916.
- Arrow K. J., Chenery H. B., Minhas B. S., Solow R. M. Capital-labor substitution and economic efficiency. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1961. Vol. 43, No. 3. P. 225–250.
- Khatskevich G. A. [The change of consumer prices index based on the variable of elasticity of substitution]. Ekonomika i upravlenie. 2005. No. 1. P. 32–37 (in Russ.). 5. Gospodarik C. G., Kovalev M. M. [EAEU-2050: global trends and the Eurasian economic policies]. Minsk, 2015 (in Russ.).
- Mishra S. K. A brief history of production functions. IUP J. Managerial Econ. 2010. Vol. 8, No. 4. P. 6 –34.
- Hicks J. R. The theory of wages. London, 1932.
- Allen R. G. Mathematical analysis for economists. London, 1938.
- Uzawa H. Production functions with constant elasticities of substitution. Rev. Econ. Stud. 1962. Vol. 29, No. 4. P. 291–299.
- Mikhalevski B. N. [The system models the medium-term economic planning]. Мoscow, 1972 (in Russ.).
- McFadden D. Constant elasticities of substitution production functions. Rev. Econ. Stud. 1963. Vol. 30. P. 73–83.
- Kleiner G. B. [Production functions: theory, methods, application]. Moscow, 1986 (in Russ.).
- Losonczi L. Production functions having the CES property. Acta Mathematica Academiae Paedagogicae Nyiregyhaziensis. 2010. Vol. 26, No. 1. P. 113–125.
- Chen B.-Y. Classification of h-homogeneous production functions with constant elasticity of substitution. Tamkang J. Math. 2012. Vol. 43, No. 2. P. 321–328.
- Goriely A. Integrability and nonintegrability of dynamical systems. Advanced Series on Nonlinear Dynamics. 2001. Vol. 19.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)