Econometric approach to evaluating national competitiveness

  • Elena I. Vasenkova Belarusian State University, Niezaliežnasci Avenue, 4, 220030, Minsk, Belarus https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3464-0220
  • Anastasia A. Kazak Belarusian State University, Niezaliežnasci Avenue, 4, 220030, Minsk, Belarus

Abstract

The authors consider various approaches to evaluate the level of national competitiveness. The factors determining the level of national competitiveness form the basis for building econometric models of competitiveness indices according to the methods of the World Economic Forum and the International Institute for Management Development. Forecasting values of the national competitiveness index of the Republic of Belarus are counted based on the models developed. 

Author Biographies

Elena I. Vasenkova, Belarusian State University, Niezaliežnasci Avenue, 4, 220030, Minsk, Belarus

PhD (physics and mathematics), docent; associate professor at the department of analytical economics and econometrics, faculty of economics

Anastasia A. Kazak, Belarusian State University, Niezaliežnasci Avenue, 4, 220030, Minsk, Belarus

master’s degree student at the department of analytical economics and econometrics, faculty of economics

References

  1. Porter M. The competitive advantage of nations [Internet] [cited 2018 April 27]. Available from: http://seinstitute.ru/Files/ Veh6­35_Porter.pdf. Russian.
  2. Schwab K, editor. Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018 [Internet]. 2017 September 26 [cited 2018 May 5]. World Economic Forum. Available from: https://www.weforum.org/reports/the­global­competitiveness­report­2017­2018.
  3. Amutinov AM. The main factors affecting the competitiveness of the state. Prioritety Rossii [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2018 April 27];3(6):23–32. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru /article/v/osnovnye­faktory­vliyayuschie­na­konkurentosposobnost­gosudarstva­1. Russian.
  4. The 2016 IMD World Competitiveness Scoreboard [Internet] [cited 2018 May 26]. Available from: https://www.imd.org/research/books/world­competitiveness­yearbook­2016.
  5. The legatum prosperity index. 2017. Creating the Pathways from Poverty to Prosperity [Internet] [cited 2018 May 16]. Available from: https://www.prosperity.com/rankings.
  6. Doing Business 2018. Reforming to Create Jobs [Internet] [cited 2018 May 16]. Available from: http://www.doingbusiness.org/ content/dam/doingBusiness/media/Annual­Reports/English/DB2018­Full­Report.pdf.
  7. United Nations e-Government Survey 2014 [Internet] [cited 2018 May 16]. Available from: https://publicadministration.un.org/ egovkb/en­us/reports/un­e­government­survey­2014.
  8. Human Development Report [Internet] [cited 2018 May 16]. Composite indices – HDI and beyond. Available from: http://hdr. undp.org/en/statistics/understanding/indices.
  9. World Bank [Internet] [cited 2018 May 16]. World Development Indicators. Available from: http://databank.worldbank.org/ data/reports.aspx?source=world­development­indicators.
  10. Bloomberg: The Most Efficient Health Care 2016. Humanities technology [Internet]. 2016 October 8 [cited 2018 May 16]. Available from: https://gtmarket.ru/news/2016/10/08/7306. Russian.
  11. PayingTaxes 2016 [Internet] [cited 2018 May 26]. Available from: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/paying­taxes­2016/paying­taxes­2016.pdf.
  12. Cornell University, INSEAD, WIPO. The Global Innovation Index 2015. Effective Innovation Policies for Development [Internet]. Geneva; 2015 [cited 2018 May 16]. Available from: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_gii_2015.pdf.
Published
2019-02-09
Keywords: national competitiveness, national competitiveness evaluation, competitiveness ratings, econometric model
How to Cite
Vasenkova, E. I., & Kazak, A. A. (2019). Econometric approach to evaluating national competitiveness. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Economics, 2, 4-12. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/economy/article/view/2249
Section
C. Mathematical and Quantitative Methods