Costs and benefits of Internet gambling for society (evidence from the United Kingdom)
Abstract
This study is trying to quantify the costs and benefits of Internet gambling as well as calculate the net effect for the United Kingdom. Therefore, the research aim is to see whether Internet gambling should be a concern in the United Kingdom right now. The costs and benefits are calculated by using generally accepted measures and concepts of welfare economics, which should create consensus regarding a justified framework in the gambling literature, especially in regards to the calculation of social costs. The results show that the net effect of online gambling in the United Kingdom ranges from 643 168 031 to 2 774 780 478 pounds sterling if addicted gamblers are considered rational, while it ranges from 418 791 001 to 2 550 403 448 pounds sterling to if addicted gamblers are considered irrational. Therefore, the total value of the benefits will depend on whether gambling is seen as a rational action or not. Furthermore, the total value of the costs will mainly depend on how the emotional costs of gambling are treated.
References
- Gainsbury S. Internet Gambling: Current Research Findings and Implications. New York: Springer; 2012.
- Wood RT, Williams RJ. Internet Gambling: Prevalence, Patterns, Problems, and Policy Options. Ontario, Canada: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre; 2009.
- Gambling Commission [Internet] [cited 2018 May 8]. Industry Statistics. 2017. Available from: http://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/news-action-and-statistics/Statistics-and-research/Statistics/Industry-statistics.aspx.
- Orford J. An unsafe bet? The dangerous rise of gambling and the debate we should be having. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011.
- Gambling Commission [Internet]. 2016 November [cited 2018 May 9]. New figures show online gambling is largest gambling sector in Britain. Available from: http://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/news-action-and-statistics/news/2016/New-figures-showonline-gambling-is-largest-gambling-sector-in-Britain.aspx.
- Walker DM. Problems in Quantifying the Social Costs and Benefits of Gambling. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 2007;66(3):609–645. DOI: 10.1111/j1536=7150.2007.00529.x.
- Crane Y. What are the costs and benefits of gambling in the United Kingdom? In: Coryn T, Fijnaut C, Littler A, editors. Economic aspects of gambling regulation: EU and US perspectives. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 2008. p. 119–178.
- Australian Productivity Commission. Australia’s Gambling Industries. Canberra: AusInfo; 1999.
- Grinols EL. Gambling in America: Costs and Benefits. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
- ACIL Consulting. Benefits and Costs of Gambling: A Framework for Analysis. A Submission to the Productivity Commission Inquiry into Australias Gambling Industries. Canberra; 1999.
- Single E. Estimating the Costs of Substance Abuse: Implications to the Estimation of the Costs and Benefits of Gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies. 2003;19(2):215–233.
- Pettinger T. Social Benefit [Internet]. 2016 September 19 [cited 2018 May 8]. Available from: https://www.economicshelp.org/ blog/glossary/social-benefit/.
- Morgan W, Katz M, Rosen H. Microeconomics. London, Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education; 2009.
- Mankiw G. Principles of Microeconomics. Mason: Cengage Learning; 2013.
- Black J. Dictionary of Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
- Walker DM. Methodological Issues in the Social Cost of Gambling Studies. Journal of Gambling Studies. 2003;19(2):149–184.
- Walker DM, Barnett AH. The Social Cost of Gambling: An Economic Perspective. Journal of Gambling Studies. 1999;15:181–212.
- Hayward K, Colman R. The costs and benefits of gaming: A summary report from the literature review. Nova Scotia: Nova Scotia Gaming Foundation; 2004.
- Becker GS, Grossman M, Murphy KM. Rational Addiction and the Effect of Price on Consumption. The American Economic Review. 1991;81(2):237–241.
- Collins D, Lapsley H. The Social Costs and Benefits of Gambling. An Introduction of the Economic Issues. Journal of Gambling Studies. 2003;19(2):123–148.
- Gross Revenue [Internet] [cited 2018 May 8]. Available from: https://www.casinopedia.org/terms/g/gross-revenue. 22. The UK betting and gaming market: price elasticities of demand and use of promotions [Internet]. 2014 June 29 [cited 2018 October 8]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-uk-betting-and-gaming-market-price-elasticities-of-demand-and-use-of-promotions.
- Conolly A, Fuller L, Jones H, Maplethorpe N, Sondael A, Wardle H. Gambling behaviour in Great Britain in 2015: Evidence from England, Scotland and Wales [Internet] [cited 2018 October 8]. Available from: http://live-gamblecom.cloud.contensis.com/PDF/ survey-data/Gambling-behaviour-in-Great-Britain-2015.pdf.
- Forrest D. An Economic and Social Review of Gambling in Great Britain. The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics. 2013;7(3):1–33. DOI: 10.5750/jgbe.v7i3.816.
- Orford J, Wardle H, Griffiths M. What proportion of gambling is problem gambling? Estimates from the 2010 British Gambling Prevalence Survey. International Gambling Studies. 2013;13(1):4 –18. DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2012.689001.
- General Betting Duty, Pool Betting Duty and Remote Gaming Duty [Internet]. 2014 August 14 [cited 2018 October 8]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/general-betting-duty-pool-betting-duty-and-remote-gaming-duty#history.
- Stradbrooke S. Bet365 annual revenue tops £2.2b, profit jumps to £504m [Internet]. 2016 November 7 [cited 2018 October 9]. Available from: https://calvinayre.com/2017/11/07/business/bet365-annual-revenue-tops-2b/.
- Tax On Betting & Gambling – Do I Need To Pay Tax? What Tax Do Operators Pay? [Internet] [cited 2018 May 8]. Available from: http://www.onlinebetting.org.uk/betting-guides/gambling-and-betting-tax-in-the-uk.html.
- Coryn T. Casinos: Lessons learn from Cost-Benefit-Analysis. In: Coryn T, Fijnaut C, Littler A, editors. Economic aspects of gambling regulation: EU and US perspectives. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 2008. P. 31–70.
- Pyles S. How Much Bankruptcy Costs and How to Pay for it [Internet]. 2018 March 12 [cited 2018 May 8]. Available from: https://www.nerdwallet.com/blog/finance/bankruptcy-costs-pay/.
- Petry NM, Weinstock J. Internet Gambling Is Common in College Students and Associated with Poor Mental Health. The American Journal of Addiction. 2007;16(5):325–330. DOI: 10.1080/10550490701525673.
- Black S. Rules, Regulations, and Social Benefits [Internet]. 2017 March 8 [cited 2018 May 8]. Available from: http://econofact. org/rules-regulations-and-social-benefits.
- Problem gamblers could cost Britain up to £1,2 billion new research shows [Internet]. 2016 December 13 [cited 2018 December 14]. Available from: https://www.ippr.org/news-and-media/press-releases/problem-gamblers-could-cost-britain-up-to-1-2-billionnew-research-shows.
- Quittance Legal Services [Internet] [cited 2018 May 9]. Carvis P. How much compensation can I get for my personal injury? Available from: https://www.quittance.co.uk/personal-injury-compensation-claims-calculator.
- Smethurst E. The Social Impact of Problem Gambling [Internet]. 2014 April 16 [cited 2018 May 9]. Available from: https:// www.gordonmoody.org.uk/blog/the-social-impact-of-problem-gambling.
- Griffiths M, Parke A, Wood R, Parke J. Internet Gambling: An Overview of Psychosocial Impacts. UNLV Gaming Research and Review Journal. 2006;10(1):27–39.
- Gambling Commission. Young People and Gambling 2016: A research study among 11–15 year olds in England and Wales [Internet]. 2016 November [cited 2018 May 8]. Available from:
- http://live-gamblecom.cloud.contensis.com/PDF/survey-data/Youngpeople-and-gambling-2016.pdf.
Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Economics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)