Research on the correlation between Chinaʼs scientific research, technology innovation and economic development

  • Aleksei I. Korotkevich Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus
  • Xu Xiaoyun Gansu Zhongli Beidou Satellite Navigation Information Service Co., 279 Yannan Street, Lanzhou 730010, China; Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

Abstract

The purpose is to study the relationship between China’s scientific research investment, technological innovation and economic development in the past 20 years. This article uses empirical research to sequentially analyze the time series using unit root test, cointegration test, and Bayesian network graph model analysis. The research results show that there is a long-term balanced cointegration relationship between scientific research investment, technological innovation and economic development.

Author Biographies

Aleksei I. Korotkevich, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

PhD (economics), docent; head of the department of banking economics, faculty of economics

Xu Xiaoyun, Gansu Zhongli Beidou Satellite Navigation Information Service Co., 279 Yannan Street, Lanzhou 730010, China; Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

finance manager, Gansu Zhongli Beidou Satellite Navigation Information Service Co., and postgraduate student at the department of banking economics, faculty of economics, Belarusian State University
.

References

  1. Deng Junrong, Long Rongrong. An empirical study on the role of Chinese venture capital in technological innovation. Technology Economy and Management Research. 2013;6:49–52.
  2. Lu Jing. Theoretical and empirical research on the relationship between financial development and economic growth: a cointegration analysis based on inter-provincial panel data in China. China Management Science. 2012;20(1):177–184.
  3. Shao Tongyao. Venture capital, innovation and cumulative effects of innovation dynamic panel analysis based on system GMM estimation. Soft Science. 2011;6:6–10.
  4. Yang Yan, Shao Tongyao. Research on the causality between venture capital and regional innovation based on panel data. Management Review. 2012;6:27–33.
  5. Bravo-Ortega C, Marin AG. R&D and productivity: a two-way avenue? World Development. 2011;39(7):1090–1107.
  6. Pradhan RP, Arvin MB. Endogenous dynamics between innovation, financial markets, venture capital and economic growth: evidence from Europe. Journal of Multinational Financial Management. 2018;45:15–34.
  7. Mallick B, Gold DL, Baladandayuthapani V. Bayesian analysis of gene expression data. Hoboken: Wiley; 2009. 252 p.
  8. Pradhan RP, Arvin MB, Bahmani S. Are innovation and financial development causative factors in economic growth? Evidence from a panel granger causality test. Technological Forecasting and Social change. 2018;132:130–142.
  9. Chen Jianli. Can venture capital promote the technological innovation of high-tech enterprises? Based on the empirical evidence of China’s GEM listed companies. Economic Management. 2011;2:71–77.
  10. Tingguo Zheng, Liu Jinquan. An empirical study on the impact of Chinese currency supply-output asymmetry. Economic Research Journal. 2008;1:35–36.
  11. Arltova M, Fedorova D. Selection of unit root test on the basis of length of the time series and value of AR parameter. Statistika: Statistics and Economy Journal. 2016;93(3):49–50.
Published
2020-09-12
Keywords: technological innovation, research investment, economic development, cointegration test, Bayesian network probability graph
How to Cite
Korotkevich, A. I., & Xiaoyun, X. (2020). Research on the correlation between Chinaʼs scientific research, technology innovation and economic development. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Economics, 1, 96-102. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/economy/article/view/2282
Section
O. Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth