Machine learning in the field of business model platformisation
Abstract
The strong trend towards platformisation in many areas of the economy and public life allows us to consider it a fundamental concept known and understood for industrial or somewhat digital revolutions. Platform ecosystems are replacing traditional models, first in the IT field and then beyond, mainly due to the digitisation of products, services and business processes. In turn, this requires a fundamental change in strategic thinking. The platform owner must consciously manage its evolution within a specific model, allowing maximum convenience, speed of operations, and diversity of counterparties. We examined the processes of implementing machine learning in various financial modelling and decision-making systems. This paper introduces the industry context for machine learning in finance, discusses essential developments that have shaped the need for machine learning in the finance industry, and discusses unique barriers to adoption. The financial industry has embraced machine learning to varying degrees of sophistication. Some key examples demonstrate the nature of machine learning and how it is used in practice.
References
- Pecheranskyi I, Revenko A. Disruptive digital technologies as a means for destroying the foundations of oligarchomics: world experience and challenges for Ukraine. Economic Annals-ХХI. 2019;9–10(179):31–39. DOI: 10.21003/ea.V179-03.
- Khare A, Stewart B, Schatz R. Phantom ex machina. Digital disruption’s role in business model. Cham: Springer; 2017. 354 p.
- Coase RH. The nature of the firm. Economica. 1937;4(16):386–405.
- Moore G. Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics. 1965;8(38):114–117. DOI: 10.1109/N-SSC.2006.4785860.
- Hendler J, Golbeck J. Metcalfe’s law, web 2.0, and the semantic web. Journal of Web Semantics. 2008;1(6):14–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.websem.2007.11.008.
- Dudin MN, Shkodinskii SV, Usmanov DI. Key trends and regulations of the development of digital business models of banking services in Industry 4.0. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2021;5(25):59–78. Russian. DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2021-25-5-59-78.
- Rochet J-C, Tirole J. Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association. 2003;1(4):990–1029. DOI: 10.1162/154247603322493212.
- Armstrong M. Competition in two-sided markets. RAND Journal of Economics. 2006;3(37):668–691.
- Yoffie DB, Kwak M. With friends like these: the art of managing complementors. Harvard Business Review. 2006;9(84):88–98.
- Hagiu A. Two-sided platforms: product variety and pricing structures. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy. 2009;4(18):1011–1043. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00236.x.
- Galeotti A, Moraga-Gonzalez JL. Platform intermediation in a market for differentiated products. European Economic Review. 2009;4(53):417–428. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2008.08.003.
- Cennamo C, Santalo J. Platform competition: strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strategic Management Journal. 2013;11(34):1331–1350. DOI: 10.1002/smj.2066.
- Parker G, van Alstyne M. Innovation, openness, and platform control. Management Science. 2018;7(64):3015–3032. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2757.
- Jacobides MG, Cennamo C, Gawer A. Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal. 2018;8(39):1–22. DOI: 10.1002/smj.2904.
- Ceccagnoli M, Forman C, Huang P, Wu DJ. Co-creation of value in a platform ecosystem: the case of enterprise software. MIS Quarterly. 2012;1(36):263–290. DOI: 10.2307/41410417.
- Gawer A, Cusumano M. How companies become platform leaders. MIT Sloan Management Review. 2008;2(49):28–35.
- Wareham J, Fox PB, Cano Giner JL. Technology ecosystem governance. Organization Science. 2014;4(25):1195–1215. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2201688.
- Flood M, Jagadish HV, Raschid L. Big data challenges and opportunities in financial stability monitoring. Financial Stability Review. 2016;20:129–142.
- López de Prado MM. Beyond econometrics: a roadmap towards financial machine learning. Econometric Modelling: Theoretical Issues in Microeconometrics eJournal [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2022 February 10]. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3365282. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3365282.
- Gu S, Kelly BT, Xiu D. Empirical asset pricing via machine learning. The Review of Financial Studies. 2020;5(33):2223–2273.
- Dixon MF, Polson NG. Short communication: deep fundamental factor models. SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 February 10];3(11). Available from: https://epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/20M1330518. DOI: 10.1137/20M1330518.
- Akaike H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Parzen E, Tanabe K, Kitagawa G, editors. Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike. Springer Series in Statistics. New York: Springer; 1998. p. 199–213.
- Bondarenko IA. Actual issues of distribution and implementation of digital business models in Russian Federation. Natural Humanitarian Studies. 2021;3(35):63–67. Russian. DOI: 10.24412/2309-4788-2021-11126.
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Economics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)