«Invisible hand», organic institutions and spontaneous orders: the evolution of the research programme

  • Aliaksandr V. Kavaliou Belarusian National Technical University, 65 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220013, Belarus

Abstract

The author of the article analyses the genesis and subsequent influence of the Smithian approach of the «invisible hand» as an impersonal force pushing the actions of each economic entity, carried out under the influence of private interest, to achieve the public good. Developing this approach to the mechanism of interpersonal coordination, in the tradition of the Austrian school of economics, the theory of the emergence of organic institutions by K. Menger and the theory of spontaneous order by F. Hayek were created. The basis for explaining the emergence of social institutions and the evolution of humanity as a whole is the interpretation of the emergence and spread of knowledge. A spontaneous order, which arises without a rational plan and will of people, but as a result of their actions, cannot be formed otherwise than by trial and error. The same method touchs the selection of those effective rules that contribute to the formation of social orders. In this regard, it seems misleading to criticise A. Smith for supporting some regulatory government endeavors that can be interpreted as experiments in finding practices that lead to prosperity.

Author Biography

Aliaksandr V. Kavaliou, Belarusian National Technical University, 65 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220013, Belarus

PhD (economics), docent; associate professor at the department of economics and law, faculty of management technologies and humanisation

References

  1. Avtonomov V, Anan’in O, Makasheva N, editors. Istoriya ekonomicheskikh uchenii [History of economic thought]. Мoscow: Infra-М; 2013. 784 p. Russian.
  2. Anikin AV. Yunost’ nauki: zhizn’ i idei myslitelei-ekonomistov do Marksa [The youth of science: the life and ideas of thinkereconomists before Marx]. Мoscow: Politizdat; 1979. 367 p. Russian.
  3. Blaug M. Ekonomicheskaya mysl’ v retrospektive [Economic thought in retrospect]. Мoscow: Delo; 1994. 720 p. Russian.
  4. Gloveli GD. Istoriya ekonomicheskikh uchenii [History of economic thought]. Мoscow: Yurait; 2012. 742 p. Russian.
  5. Maiburd EM. Vvedenie v istoriyu ekonomicheskoi mysli: ot prorokov do professorov [Introduction into history of economic thought: from prophets to professors]. Мoscow: Delo; 2000. 560 p. Russian.
  6. Rothbard M. Ekonomicheskaya mysl’. Tom 1 [Economic thought. Volume 1]. Мoscow: Sotsium; 2020. 613 p. Russian.
  7. Usanov PV. Retrospektiva ekonomicheskoi mysli: ot Drevnei Gretsii do sovremennosti [Retrospective of economic thought: from Ancient Greek to contemporary world]. Saint Petersburg: Strata; 2019. 302 p. Russian.
  8. Ronkal’ya A. Bogatstvo idei: istoriya ekonomicheskoi mysli [The wealth of ideas: history of economic thought]. Мoscow: Publishing House of Higher School of Economics; 2018. 656 p. Russian.
  9. Kavaliou AV. On the evaluation of Menger’s theoretical evolution, or A story on «four Mengers». Journal of New Economic Association. 2020;1:44 – 63. Russian. DOI: 10.31737/2221-2264-2020-45-1-2.
  10. Kavaliou A. Institutionalism and liberalism: the complexity of interaction. Oikonomus. 2019;3:58 – 65.
  11. Smith A. Teoriya nravstvennykh chuvstv [The theory of moral sentiment]. Мoscow: Respublika; 1997. 351 p. Russian.
  12. Smith A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov [An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations]. Мoscow: Eksmo; 2009. 960 p. Russian.
  13. Skalkin VV, Sidorova SA. The problem of spontaneity in institutional economic theory. Filisofiya khoziaistva. 2022;2:124 –133. Russian.
  14. Sargent TJ. Competing economic views. Report summary. Vestnik finansovogo universiteta. 2015;1:6 –15. Russian.
  15. Taranukha YuV. Adam Smith’s «invisible hand»: defining its content and assessing the role. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. 2018;6:162–173. Russian. DOI: 10.31857/S086904990002758-5.
  16. Kapeliushnikov RI. Multihanded Adam Smith (part one). Voprosy ekonomiki. 2023;10:53 –74. Russian. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2023-10-53-74.
  17. Horwitz S. From Smith to Merger to Hayek: liberalism in the spontaneous order tradition. The Independent Review. 2001;6(1): 81–97.
  18. Ferguson A. Opyt istorii grazhdanskogo obshchestva [An essay on the history of civil society]. Мoscow: Rosspen; 2000. 389 p. Russian.
  19. Hayek FA. Pagubnaya samonadeyannost’ [Fatal conceit]. Мoscow: Novosti; 1992. 302 p. Russian.
  20. Menger C. [Principles of economics]. In: Menger C. Izbrannye raboty [Selected works]. Moscow: Territoriya budushchego; 2005. p. 57–286. Russian.
  21. Menger C. [Investigations into the method of the social sciences, with special reference to economics]. In: Menger C. Izbrannye raboty [Selected works]. Moscow: Territoriya budushchego; 2005. p. 287– 495. Russian.
  22. Menger C. On the origin of money. Economic Journal. 1892;2:239 – 255.
  23. Festré A. Carl Menger and Friedrich von Wieser on the role of knowledge and beliefs. In: Arena R, Festré A, Lazaric N. Handbook of knowledge and economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2012. p. 73–98.
  24. Kavaliou AV, Peniaz OS. Mutual influence of institutions in the concept of Carl Menger. Terra Economicus. 2022;20(1):27–37. Russian. DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2022-20-1-27-37.
  25. Streissler E, Streissler M, editors. Carl Menger’s lectures to crown prince Rudolf of Austria. Aldershot: Edward Elgar; 1994. 240 p.
  26. Zvrcek T, Zajchek M. School, what is it good for? Useful human capital and the history of public education in Central Europe. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2013. 39 p.
  27. Islamov TM. [On the formation of Central-European cultural-historical community]. In: Vaganova NM, Vinogradova EK, editors. Khudozhestvennaya kul’tura Avstro-Vengrii: iskusstvo mnogonatsional’noi imperii. 1867–1918 [The artistic culture of Austria-Hungary: the art of a multinational empire. 1867–1918]. Saint Petersburg: Aleteya; 2005. p. 7–17. Russian.
  28. Nesterenko O. F. von Hayek’s theory of spontaneous order. Vestnik Kievskogo natsional’nogo universiteta imeni T. G. Shevchenko. Seriya: Ekonomika. 2013;5:52–56. Russian.
  29. Kapeliushnikov RI. Multihanded Adam Smith (part two). Voprosy ekonomiki. 2023;11:123–140. Russian. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2023-11-123-140.
  30. Hayek FA. [Economic theory and knowledge]. In: Hayek FA. Individualizm i ekonomicheskii poryadok [Individualism and economic order]. Мoscow: Izograf; 2000. p. 41– 68. Russian.
  31. Kapeliushnikov RI. Kontseptsiya kul’turnoi evolyutsii F. A. Khaieka i evolyutsionnaya psikhologiya [F. A. Hayek’s cultural evolution concept and evolutionary psychology]. Мoscow: Publishing House High School of Economics; 2023. 84 p. Russian.
Published
2024-06-18
Keywords: «invisible hand», A. Smith, C. Menger, F. Hayek, knowledge, spontaneous order
Supporting Agencies The author expresses gratitude to the participants of the conference «Economy, society and culture: Adam Smith’s legacy and modernity», held at the faculty of economics of Lomonosov Moscow State University on 10 November 2023, for valuable comments and observations.
How to Cite
Kavaliou, A. V. (2024). «Invisible hand», organic institutions and spontaneous orders: the evolution of the research programme. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Economics, 1, 17-24. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/economy/article/view/6167
Section
B. History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches