Structure and mapping of landscapes of the Pripyatsky National Park using geoinformation technologies

  • Galina I. Martsinkevich Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus
  • Natallia V. Hahina Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4872-3788
  • Dzmitry M. Kurlovich Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5510-9201
  • Olga M. Kovalevskaya Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1283-7532
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6740-2021-1-65-74

Abstract

The article considers new approaches to the study of the structure of natural landscapes, the identification of typical and rare landscapes of Pripyatsky National Park and their mapping using GIS-technologies that allow the creation of digital landscape maps. The relevance of the work is to create the first digital maps for the Pripyatsky National Park, which can be used to expand the network of ecological routes, increase the number of objects of inspection of the territory by tourists, monitoring forests and swamps. The created digital landscape map reflects the hierarchical levels and structure of natural complexes in the rank of genera, species and tracts, as well as the principles of their selection, which correspond to scientific approaches to the classification of landscapes of the Belarusian school of landscape studies. As a result, the main factor of the selection of genera is the genesis, species – the nature of relief, tracts – features of relief and soil-vegetation cover. The mapping of landscapes of specially protected natural areas (SPNA) of the Republic of Belarus using GIS-technologies was first tested on the example of the Berezinsky Biosphere Reserve and three national parks (Narochansky, Braslavskie Ozera, Belovezhskaya Pushcha). The digital landscape map of the Pripyatsky National Park, which illustrates the territorial distribution of 4 genera, 19 types of landscapes and 3 types of tracts, helped to clarify the boundaries of landscape units and served as the basis for identifying typical and rare landscapes, which is especially important for identifying rare landscapes that have preserved their natural appearance and have a special nature conservation value and in need of special protection. A digital map of typical and rare landscapes shows that within the boundaries of the park are widely represented species of lake-swamp and alluvial terraced landscapes, typical for the Polesie region, rare landscapes are confined to the floodplain landscape of the Pripyat River with ridged relief, old lakes, floodplain oak forests and tall grass meadows. In general, the identified typical landscapes of the Pripyatsky National Park are representative of the Polesie landscape province and reflect its regional features, and rare ones are found only in this region and emphasize its individuality. Digital maps made it possible to reveal the complex structure of landscapes, to discover not only typical and rare landscapes, but also unique objects in the rank of a natural boundary, and thereby show a more diverse landscape structure of the park than is reflected in the Landscape map of the Republic of Belarus (2014).

Author Biographies

Galina I. Martsinkevich, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

doctor of science (geography), full professor; scientific consultant at the laboratory of landscape ecology, faculty of geography and geoinformatics

Natallia V. Hahina, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

PhD (geography), docent; head of the department of geographical ecology, faculty of geography and geoinformatics

Dzmitry M. Kurlovich, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

PhD (geography), docent; dean of the faculty of geography and geoinformatics

Olga M. Kovalevskaya, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

senior lecturer at the department of soil science and geographic information systems, faculty of geography and geoinformatics

References

  1. Foresta RA. Natural regions for national parks: the Canadian experience. Applied Geography. 1985;5(3):179–194. DOI: 10.1016/0143-6228(85)90021-9.
  2. O’Connor KF, Overmars FB, Ralston MM. Land evaluation for nature conservation: a scientific review compiled for application in New Zealand. Wellington: Department of Conservation; 1990. 328 p. (Conservation sciences publication; No. 3).
  3. Averbuck A, Bain C, Bindloss J, Blasi A, Christiani K, Di Duca M, et al. National parks of Europe. [S. l.]: Lonely Planet; 2017. 320 p.
  4. Stahlschmidt P, Swaffield S, Primdahl J, Nellemann V. Landscape analysis. Investigating the potentials of space and place. London: Routledge; 2017. XVI, 207 р.
  5. Selman P. Planning for landscape multifunctionality. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy. 2009;5(2):45–52. DOI: 10.1080/15487733.2009.11908035.
  6. Bauer N, Wallner A, Hunziker M. The change of European landscapes: human-nature relationships, public attitudes towards rewilding, and the implications for landscape management in Switzerland. Journal of Environmental Management. 2009;90(9):2910–2920. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.01.021.
  7. Selman P. What do we mean by sustainable landscape? Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy. 2008;4(2):23–28. DOI: 10.1080/15487733.2008.11908019.
  8. Wu J. Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology. 2013;28(6):999–1023. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-013-9894-9.
  9. Wascher DM, editor. European landscape character areas. Typologies, cartography and indicators for the assessment of sustainable landscapes. Final project report as deliverable from the EU’s accompanying measure project European Landscape Character Assessment Initiative (ELCAI), funded under the 5th Framework Programme on Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (4.2.2). Wageningen: Landscape Europe; 2005. X, 150 p.
  10. Klakotskii VP, Vadkovskii VB. [Pripyat Reserve]. In: Sokolov VE, Syroechkovskii EE, editors. Zapovedniki Pribaltiki i Belorussii [Reserves of the Baltic states and Belarus]. Moscow: Mysl’; 1987. p. 290–308. (Reserves of the USSR). Russian.
  11. Martsinkevich GI. [Landscape diversity of Pripyatsky National Park and its change under the influence of economic activity]. Ekologo-ekonomicheskie problemy razvitiya regiona Belorusskogo Poles’ ya. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii; 13–15 maya 2003 g.; Pinsk, Belarus’ [Ecological and economic problems of the development of the Belarusian Polesie region. Materials of the International scientific and practical conference; 2003 May 13–15; Pinsk, Belarus]. Minsk: Belarus State Economic University; 2004. p. 277–280. Russian.
  12. Sokolov VE, Syroechkovskii EE, editors. Zapovedniki evropeiskoi chasti RSFSR. Chast’ 1 [Reserves of the European part of the RSFSR. Part 1]. Moscow: Mysl’; 1988. 288 р. (Reserves of the USSR). Russian.
  13. Sokolov VE, Syroechkovskii EE, editors. Zapovedniki Ukrainy i Moldavii [Reserves of Ukraine and Moldova]. Moscow: Mysl’; 1987. 271 р. (Reserves of the USSR). Russian.
  14. Hahina NV, Kurlovich DM, Kovalevskaya OM. Creation of digital maps of natural landscapes of the National Park «Narochanskiy». InterCarto. InterGIS. 2020;26(4):90–103. Russian. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2020-4-26-90-103.
  15. Kurlovich DM, Hahina NV, Kavaleuskaja VM, Martsinkevich GI. GIS-technologies in mapping of landscapes of National Park «Bielaviežskaja pušča». In: Maskevich SA, Poznyak SS, editors. Sakharovskie chteniya 2019 goda: ekologicheskie problemy XXI veka. Materialy 19-i Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii; 23–24 maya 2019 g.; Minsk, Belarus’. Chast’ 3 [Sakharov readings of 2019: environmental problems of the 21st century. Proceedings of the 19th International scientific conference; 2019 May 23–24; Minsk, Belarus. Part 3]. Minsk: Information and Computing Center of the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Belarus; 2019. p. 320–324. Russian.
  16. Klebanovich NV, Prokopovich SN, Sazonov AA. Interactive creation of digital derivatives thematic maps of the base layer «soil» of the land information systems of the Republic of Belarus. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Geography and Geology. 2017;1:121–129. Russian.
Published
2021-06-08
Keywords: national park, typical landscape, rare landscape, geoinformation technologies, landscape mapping, digital maps
How to Cite
Martsinkevich, G. I., Hahina, N. V., Kurlovich, D. M., & Kovalevskaya, O. M. (2021). Structure and mapping of landscapes of the Pripyatsky National Park using geoinformation technologies. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Geography and Geology, 1, 65-74. https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6740-2021-1-65-74
Issue
No 1 (2021): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Geography and Geology
Section
Geography

Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Geography and Geology

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)