Geographical features of tourism development in various high-altitude zones of mountainous areas of Azerbaijan

  • Gunesh R. Agakishiyeva Institute of Geography named after Academician Hasan Aliyev, 115 H. Javid Avenue, Baku AZ1143, Azerbaijan

Abstract

The development of tourism in various high-altitude zones of the mountainous areas of Azerbaijan was studied using system, assessment and cartographic methods. The legislative framework in the field of tourism, existing historical and cultural monuments of world and national importance were analysed. The possibilities for developing such types of tourism as caving tourism, ecotourism, ethnographic tourism, ski tourism, historical and cultural tourism in the administrative districts of Azerbaijan located at an altitude of 1001–2000 m and more above sea level were assessed. The existing recreation and tourism facilities in these areas, which do not meet the needs of the growing number of tourists, are studied. The administrative districts of the country, distinguished by the number of settlements located at an altitude of 1001–2000 m and more above sea level, as well as the works of local and foreign scientists devoted to the development of tourism in highlands, are considered. Based on the legislative framework in the field of tourism and archive materials, it is determined that the administrative districts of the republic located at an altitude of 1001–2000 m and more above sea level, as well as the cities and villages included in them, have a large number of architectural and archaeological monuments that play an important role in tourism development. The economic indicators of hotels and hotel-type enterprises in mountainous areas for 2015–2022 are analysed, and the absence of statistical data for some mountainous areas is substantiated. Taking into account the growing role of tourism in the overall socio-economic development of the country and the advantages of mountainous relief over flat areas, a score is given to mountainous areas in terms of the level of provision with a hotel network, as well as historical and cultural sites of global and national significance. It is established that mountainous areas have great tourism potential, including natural, historical and cultural tourism resources. The results obtained can be used in programmes for the socio-economic development of the regions of the country.

Author Biography

Gunesh R. Agakishiyeva, Institute of Geography named after Academician Hasan Aliyev, 115 H. Javid Avenue, Baku AZ1143, Azerbaijan

PhD (geography), docent; leading researcher at the department of political and economic geography of Azerbaijan

References

  1. Agakishiyeva GR. The role of physical geographic conditions in organization of tourism in Azerbaijan. Privolzhskii nauchnyi vestnik. 2016;3:139–144. Russian. EDN: VRBVMH
  2. Agakishiyeva GR. Territorial organization of tourism in the mountainous regions of Azerbaijan (on the example of Sheki-Zagatala, Guba-Khachmaz and Mountainous Shirvan economic and geographical regions). Vestnik of National Tourism Academy. 2020;4:41–44. Russian. EDN: LOCOEN.
  3. Agakishiyeva GR. Prospects for tourism development in mountainous regions of Azerbaijan (the Upper-Karabakh and Kel¬ bajar-Lachin economic-geographical areas are examples). Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Geography. Geoecology. 2023;1:13–22. Russian. DOI: 10.17308/geo/1609-0683/2023/1/13-22.
  4. Məmmədov QŞ, Yusifov EF, Xəlilov MY, Kərimov VN. Azərbaycan: ekoturizm potensialı. Cild 1. Bakı: Şərq-Qərb; 2012. 359 s.
  5. Soltanova HB. Azərbaycan Respublikasında turizm və onun inkişafı. Bakı: AzTU; 2015. 475 s.
  6. Galachieva LА. The recreational potential of the geomorphological resources of the Kabardino-Balkarian territory. Proceedings of Dagestan State Pedagogical University. Natural and Exact Sciences. 2015;2:109–113. Russian. EDN: UWOLKH.
  7. Zyryanov AI, Korolev AYu. Touristic zoning of mountain areas. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5, Geografiya. 2009; 6:19–25. Russian. EDN: KZAPUJ.
  8. Korolev AYu. Matters of tourism organization in climbing zones of Russia. Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series: Biology. Earth Sciences. 2015;25(2):180–185. Russian. EDN: UAPUKT.
  9. Taher SHM, Jamal SA, Sumarjan N, Aminudin N. Examining the structural relations among hikers’ assessment of pull-factors, satisfaction and revisit intentions: the case of mountain tourism in Malaysia. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism. 2015;12:82–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.jort.2015.11.012.
  10. Nepal SK. Tourism and the environment: perspectives from the Nepal Himalaya. Lalitpur: Himal Books; 2003. XXVIII, 205 p. Co-published by the «Studien Verlag».
  11. Romeo R, Russo L, Parisi F, Notarianni M, Manuelli S, Carvao S. Mountain tourism – towards a more sustainable path. Rome: FAO; 2021. 120 p. Co-published by the World Tourism Organization (UNWTO). DOI: 10.4060/cb7884en.
  12. Tigu G. New challenges for tourism destination management in Romania. In: Kasimoğlu M, Aydin H, editors. Strategies for tourism industry – micro and macro perspectives. Rijeka: InTech; 2012. p. 167–184.
  13. Duglio S, Beltramo R. Estimating the economic impacts of a small-scale sport tourism event: the case of the Italo-Swiss mountain trail CollonTrek. Sustainability. 2017;9(3):343. DOI: 10.3390/su9030343.
  14. Nordregio. Mountain areas in Europe: analysis of mountain areas in EU member states, acceding and other European countries. Final report. [S. l.]: Nordregio; 2004 January. XIX, 271 p. Contract No. 2002.CE.16.0.AT.136.
  15. Борсук ОА, Тимофеев ДА. Рельеф как природное и культурное наследие. В: Григорьев ГН, редактор. Проблемы экологической геоморфологии. Материалы Межгосударственного совещания XXV пленума Геоморфологической комиссии РАН; 18–22 сентября 2000 г.; Белгород, Россия. Белгород: Издательство Белгородского государственного университета; 2000. с. 14–15.
  16. Marić I. Izgradnja u planinskim područjima. U: Mitrović S, urednik. Planina-2002: raubovanje resursa, odsustvo razvoja, odlazak stanovništva. Konferencija o razvoju planinskih područja sa međunarodnim učešćem; decembar 2002; Kopaonik, Srbija. Beograd: Savez inženjera i tehničara Srbije; 2002. s. 103–105. Zajedno sa Institutom za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije.
  17. Panov N, Taleska M, Dimeska H. The importance of mountain regions for tourism development in Republic of Macedonia. In: Markoski B, Milevski I, Gorin S, Radevski I, Iliev D, Zlatanoski V, editors. Hilly mountain areas – problems and perspectives. Proceedings from International scientific symposium; 2013 September 12–15; Ohrid, Macedonia. Tome 2. [S. l.]: Macedonian Geographical Society; 2013. p. 547–553.
  18. Brohman J. New directions in tourism for third world development. Annals of Tourism Research. 1996;23(1):48–70. DOI: 10.1016/0160-7383(95)00043-7.
  19. Gurung CP, DeCoursey MA. Too much too fast: lessons from Nepal’s lost kingdom of Mustang. In: Godde PM, Price MF, Zimmermann FM, editors. Tourism and development in mountain regions. Wallingford: CABI Publishing; 2000. p. 239–254.
  20. UNWTO. Innovative strategies for sustainable mountain tourism development. 3rd Euro-Asian mountain resorts conference; 2017 April 4–7; Tbilisi, Georgia [Internet]. [S. l.]: [s. n.]; 2017 [cited 2023 March 21]. Available from: https://www.unwto.org/archive/ global/event/3rd-euro-asian-mountain-resorts-conference.
  21. Buerki R, Elsasser H, Abegg B. Climate change – impacts on the tourism industry in mountain areas [Internet]. In: World Tourism Organization. Climate change and tourism. Proceedings of the 1st International conference; 2003 April 9–11; Djerba, Tunisia. [S. l.]: [s. n.]; 2003 [cited 2023 March 21]. Available from: https://www.e-unwto.org/doi/10.18111/9789284406326.14.
  22. Gill A, Williams P. Managing growth in mountain tourism communities. Tourism Management. 1994;15(3):212–220. DOI: 10.1016/0261-5177(94)90107-4.
  23. González A, Tonazzini D, Klarwein S. Coherencia política del turismo de montaña y el cambio climático: comarca de la Jacetania (Pirineo Aragonés) [Internet]. [S. l.]: [s. n.]; 2019 [cited 2020 March 18]. Available from: http://www.ecounion.eu/wp-content/ uploads/2019/08/Informe_JacetaniaPirineoAragon%C3%A9s_5junio2019-1.pdf.
  24. Luthe T, Wyss R, Schuckert M. Network governance and regional resilience to climate change: empirical evidence from mountain tourism communities in the Swiss Gotthard region. Regional Environmental Change. 2012;12(4):839–854. DOI: 10.1007/ s10113-012-0294-5.
  25. Scott D. Global environmental change and mountain tourism. In: Gössling S, Hall CM, editors. Tourism and global environmental change: ecological, social, economic and political interrelationships. London: Routledge; 2006. p. 54–75 (Contemporary geographies of leisure, tourism, and mobility).
  26. Orive V, Elboj C, Valero D. The impact of the economic crisis on mountain tourism: an analysis in the Central Pyrenees region in Spain. Cuadernos de Turismo. 2021;47:85–102.
  27. Nepal SK, Chipeniuk R. Mountain tourism: toward a conceptual framework. Tourism Geographies. 2005;7(3):313–333. DOI: 10.1080/14616680500164849.
  28. Budaqov BƏ, Eminov ZN, Mərdanov İE. Azərbaycanda yaşayış məntəqələrinin yüksəklik qurşaqları üzrə yerləşməsi qanunauy¬ ğunluqları. Azərbaycan Milli Elmlər Akademiyasının xəbərləri. Yer elmləri seriyası. 2006;3:89–97.
  29. Zhelnina ZY. The potential of ethnographic tourism in the development of the cultural identity of the ethnos. Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Philosophy. Political Science. Culturology. 2018;4(2):136–144. EDN: FNBIAH.
  30. Agakishiyeva GR, Ismayilova EA. Contemporary situation and development directions of the cultural tourism in the mountai¬ nous areas of Azerbaijan. Universidad & Sociedad. 2022;14(5):256–263.
Published
2024-12-19
Keywords: architectural monuments, archaeological monuments, mountainous relief, caving tourism, ecotourism, ethnographic tourism, ski tourism, historical and cultural tourism
How to Cite
Agakishiyeva, G. R. (2024). Geographical features of tourism development in various high-altitude zones of mountainous areas of Azerbaijan. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Geography and Geology, 2, 72-90. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/geography/article/view/5633