Grounds for and order of de novo proceedings in international commercial arbitration
Abstract
This article considers the procedural issues that arise after the replacement of an arbitrator in an arbitration tribunal. Such replacement raises an issue of the necessity of the case revision by the composition of the tribunal with a new arbitrator. Under the rules of arbitration institutions, this issue has been dealt with in different ways. By means of comparative legal analysis and using the theory of procedural law, the author of the article draws conclusions about the necessity to improve the regulation of this issue in Belarus.
References
- Born GB. International arbitration: law and practice. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International; 2012. 480 p.
- Rubino-Sammartano M. International arbitration law and practice (commercial, investment, online, state-individual, interstate, commodities, U.S.-Iran, UNCITRAL and sports arbitration). Huntington: JurisNet; 2014. 2025 p.
- Berger B, Kellerhals F. International and domestic arbitration in Switzerland. Berne: Stämpfli; 2015. 829 p.
- Rau AS. Arbitral jurisdiction and the dimensions of “consent” [Internet; cited 2019 February 20]. Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1081616.
- Arbitration agreement allowing for de novo review of an award deemed unenforceable of 6 June 2018 [Internet; cited 2019 February 2]. Available from: https://www.americanbar.org/groups/litigation/committees/alternative-dispute-resolution/articles/2018/spring2018-arbitration-agreement-allowing-for-de-novo-review-unenforceable-award/.
- Caron DD, Caplan LM. The UNCITRAL arbitration rules: a commentary (with an integrated and comparative discussion of the 2010 and 1976 UNCITRAL arbitration rules). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. 1048 p.
- Hellmann U, Balashenko SA, editors. Mezhdunarodnyi kommercheskii arbitrazh [International commercial arbitration]. Minsk: Izdatel’skii tsentr BGU; 2017. 395 p. Russian.
- Kamenkov VS, Bel’skaya IA, Korochkin AYu, Severin DM. Postateinyi kommentarii k Zakonu Respubliki Belarus’ «O treteiskikh sudakh» (po sostoyaniyu na 09.04.2014) [Article commentary on the Law of the Republic of Belarus “On Arbitration Courts” (as on 9 April 2014)] [Electronic resource]. Consultant Plus Belarus. LLC “YurSpektr”. Minsk; 2019. Russian.
- Avdeev AD, Aleksandrov DP, Belova TA, Bel’skaya IA. Nauchno-prakticheskii kommentarii k Khozyaistvennomu protsessual’nomu kodeksu Respubliki Belarus’ (po sostoyaniyu na 01.08.2005) [Scientific and practical commentary on the Economic Procedural Code of the Republic of Belarus (as on 1 August 2005)] [Electronic resource]. ConsultantPlus: Belarus. LLC “YurSpektr”. Minsk; 2019. Russian.
Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)