Intensification of the development of private international law of the European Union

  • Elena V. Babkina Belarusian State University, Niezaliežnasci Avenue, 4, 220030, Minsk, Belarus

Abstract

To define the main steps and the methods of the europeanisation of private international law, to find out its pros and cons and to propose possible directions for the application of the European Union experience in the practice of the Eurasian Economic Union are the objectives that the author of the present article set for herself. The positive experience of the transnationalization of sources of private international law can also be used by the Eurasian Economic Union.

Author Biography

Elena V. Babkina, Belarusian State University, Niezaliežnasci Avenue, 4, 220030, Minsk, Belarus

PhD (law), docent; head of the department of private international and European law, faculty of international relations

References

  1. Pocar F. La communitarizzazione del diritto internazionale private: una «European conflict of laws revolution»? Rivista di diritto internazionale private e processuale. 2000 October – December: 873. Italian.
  2. Basedow J. The Communitarisation of Private International Law. Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht [The Rabel Journal of Comparative and International Private Law]. 2009 July;73(3):455–460.
  3. Hein J von. Of Older Siblings and Distant Cousins: The Contribution of the Rome II Regulation to the Communitarisation of Private International Law. Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht [The Rabel Journal of Comparative and International Private Law]. 2009 July;73(3):463–508.
  4. Pocar F. La codification europeéne du droit international privé: vers l’adoption de règles rigides ou flexible vers les états tiers? Le droit international privé: esprit et méthodes; mélanges en l’honneur de Paul Lagarde. Paris: Dalloz; 2005. p. 697–705.
  5. Opinion of the Court (Full Court) 7 February 2006 [cited 2018 February 11]. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/ LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62003CV0001:EN:HTML.
  6. Opinion 1/13 of the Court (Grand Chamber). 14 October 2014 [cited 2018 February 11]. Available from: http://eur-lex. europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62013CV0001.
  7. Council Regulation (EU) No. 2016/1103 of 24 June 2016 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of matrimonial property regimes [cited 2018 January 21]. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2016.183.01.0001.01.ENG.
  8. Council Regulation (EU) No. 2016/1104 of 24 June 2016 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of the property consequences of regis tered partnerships [cited 2018 February 11]. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2016.183.01.0030.01.ENG.
  9. Council Regulation (EU) No. 1259/2010 of 20 December 2010 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation [cited 2018 February 1]. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32010R1259.
  10. Zanobetti A. Cooperation in Civil Matters and Multilevel Unification of Private International Law. In: Pietro Franzina, editor. The external dimension of EU private international law after Opinion 1/13. Cambridge, Antwerp, Portland: Intersentia; 2017.
  11. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parlament and of the Council on a Common European Sales Law (COD) [cited 2018 January 21]. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52011PC0635.
  12. Contracts for online and other distance sales of goods [cited 2018 January 11]. Available from: http://www.europarl. europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2017/599286/EPRS_BRI(2017)599286_EN.pdf. 13. Wilhelmsen LH. European perspectives on international commercial arbitration. Journal of Private International Law. 2014 April;10(1):113–128.
  13. Hartley TC. The Brussels I Regulations and Arbitration. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2014;3(4):843–866.
  14. Judgment of the Court of 25 July 1991. Marc Rich & Co. AG v Società Italiana Impianti PA [cited 2018 February 10]. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61.
  15. Green Paper on the Review of Council Regulation (EC) No. 44/2001 on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, COM (2009) 175 final [cited 2018 February 10]. Available from: http:// eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52009DC0175.
  16. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (recast), COM (2010) 748 final, 14 December 2010 [cited 2018 February 11]. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52010PC0748. 18. Wiedemann D. Convergence and Divergence in the EU’s Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters: Pleading for a Consoli dation through a Uniform European Conflict’s Codification. In: Elsa Vaz de Sequeira, Gonçalo de Almeida Ribeiro, editors. Católica Graduate Legal Research Conference 2014 – Conference Proceedings. Lissabon: [publisher unknown]; 2015. p. 175–198. (Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper; no. 15/14).
  17. Kadner Graziano T. Codifying European Union private international law: The Swiss Private International Law Act – a model for a comprehensive EU private international law regulation? Journal of Private International Law. 2015;11(3):585–606.
  18. Bogdan M. Concise introduction to EU private international law. 3rd edition. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing; 2016.
  19. Bohnet F. L’unification de la procedure civile Suisse, un modèle pour l’Union européenne? In: Douchy-Oudot M, Guinchard E, editors. La justice civile européenne en marche. Sous la direction de Mélina Douchy­Oudot et Emmanuel Guinchard. Paris: Dalloz; 2012.
  20. Nourissat C. La codification de l’espace judiciaire civil européen. In: Douchy-Oudot M, Guinchard E, editors. La justice civile européenne en marche. Sous la direction de Mélina Douchy­Oudot et Emmanuel Guinchard. Paris: Dalloz; 2012.
  21. Fallon M, Lagarde P, Poillot-Peruzzetto S. Quelle architecture pour un code européen de droit international privé? Bru xelles: Lang; 2011. DOI: 10.3726/978-3-0352-6136-3. French.
  22. Fallon F. Les conditions d’un code européen de droit international privé. In: Lagarde P, Poillot-Peruzzetto S, Fallon M. La matière civile et commerciale, socle d’un code européen de droit international privé? Paris: Dalloz; 2009. p. 175–185. French.
  23. Harder S. Convergence and Divergence in Private International Law. Journal of Private International Law. 2011 December;7(3):649–663.
  24. Kadner Graziano T. Codifying European Union private international law: The Swiss Private International Law Act – a model for a comprehensive EU private international law regulation? Journal of Private International Law. 2015;11(3):585–606.
  25. Cost of Non-Europe Report. CONE 3/2013. A European Code on Private International Law [cited 2018 January 5]. Available from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2013/504468/IPOL-JOIN_ET(2013)504468_EN.pdf.
Published
2018-10-14
Keywords: private international law, europeanisation, the European Union, regional unification, sources of law
How to Cite
Babkina, E. V. (2018). Intensification of the development of private international law of the European Union. Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations, 1, 48-54. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/internationalRelations/article/view/1325
Issue
No 1 (2018): Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations
Section
International Law

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)