Systemic interpretation of the American convention on human rights

  • Alejandro Fuentes Raoul Wallenberg Institute of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, 17B Gråbröderg Street, Lund 22105, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1547-1238

Abstract

This paper proposes a critical assessment of the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACRTHR) regarding the systemic integration of the provisions enshrined in the American convention on human rights (ACHR), under the light of the developments of the corpus juris of international human rights law. By incorporating the evolution in the interpretation of human rights law into the reading of ACHR, IACRTHR has expanded the scope of protection of the rights recognized within the ACHR, aiming at delivering more effective and comprehensive protection of them. This study will specifically focus its analysis on the interpretative method applied by IACRTHR. In particular, special attention will be given to the manner that the regional tribunal has applied the method of systemic integration of international human rights law, under the guiding light of the pro homine principle, which hermeneutically put the protection of individuals at the centre of the interpretative process of international human rights law.

Author Biography

Alejandro Fuentes, Raoul Wallenberg Institute of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, 17B Gråbröderg Street, Lund 22105, Sweden

doctor of laws; senior researcher

References

  1. Medina Quiroga C. The American convention on human rights. Crucial rights and their theory and practice. Cambridge: Intersentia; 2014. 374 p.
  2. Fuentes A. Protection of indigenous peoples’ traditional lands and exploitation of natural resources. The InterAmerican Court of Human Rights’ safeguards. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights. 2017;24:229–253.
  3. Tigroudja H. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights and international humanitarian law. In: Kolb R, Gaggioli G, editors. Research handbook on human rights and humanitarian law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2013. p. 473.
  4. Negishi Y. The pro homine principle’s role in regulating the relationship between conventionality control and constitutionality control. The European Journal of International Law. 2017;28(2):457–481.
  5. Fuentes A, Vannelli M. Human rights of children in the context of migration processes. Innovative efforts for integrating regional human rights standards in the Americas. Laws. 2019;8(4):31–54.
  6. Mazzuoli Oliveira V, Ribeiro D. The pro homine principle as an enshrined feature of international human rights law. Indonesian Journal of International & Comparative Law. 2016;3(1):77–99.
Published
2020-10-29
Keywords: human rights, systemic interpretation, corpus juris, pro homine principle, Inter-American Court of Human Rights
How to Cite
Fuentes, A. (2020). Systemic interpretation of the American convention on human rights. Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations, 1, 94-101. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/internationalRelations/article/view/2992