Minority opinions in the decisions of the International Criminal Court
When exercising in a particular field of competence, the work of every judge lies in his inalienable freedom to pronounce the law, whether he expresses his own opinion separately or with a panel. Saying so introduces well our paper called “Minority opinions in the decisions of the International Criminal Court”. Indeed, it emphasises a finding among the decisions issued by the judges of the International Criminal Court and reflects an analysis of the jurisprudence of this court. It sheds light on what interest there can be in minority opinions that embrace matters relating to a mode of exercising jurisdiction. In other words, how to explain the admissibility of minority opinions? This topic is very relevant given the extent of the practice of minority opinions in most international jurisdictions, whereas in international criminal law it is a matter not sufficiently studied by scholars.
- Logacheva E. Separate and dissenting opinions: their role in the practice of the ICJ. Riga: Graduate School of Law; 2019. 43 p.
- Dumbauld E. Dissenting opinions in international adjudication. University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register. 1942;90(8):929.
- Sereni A. P. Individual and dissenting opinions of International Court judges. Public International Law Journal. 1964; 4:819.
- Anand RP. The role of individual and dissenting opinions in international adjudication. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 1965;14(3):788–808.
- Costa JP. Separate, dissenting or concurring opinions [Internet; cited 2020 May 18]. Available from https://www.justice-en-ligne.be/En-quoi-consistent-les-opinions.
- Hambro E. Dissenting and individual opinions in the International Court of Justice [Internet; cited 2020 May 18]. Available from https://www.zaoerv.de/17_1956_57/17_1956_2_a_229_248.pdf.
- White Robin CA, Boussiakou I. Separate opinions in the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review. 2009;9(1):37–60.
- Alder J. Dissents in courts of last resort: tragic choices? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2000;20(2):221–246.
- Oraison A. General reflections on the individual and dissenting separate opinions of the judges of the International Court of Justice. International Law, Diplomatic and Political Sciences Journal. 2000;78: p. 167
- Préfontaine DC, Lee J. The rule of law and the independence of the judiciary. Revue Québécoise de droit international. 1998;11(2):163–186.
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)