Pastoralists and farmers conflict: rights or greediness

Abstract

Pastoralists are basically migrants who do not have a permanent abode but migrates from one graze land to the other. The migration may be across international borders. Farmers on the other hand have a quasi-permanent abode. However the farmland crops are so precious to the farmers while getting grasses including crops on the farmland just for the cattle to survive is the priority of the pastoralists. This conflict of interests between the pastoralists and the farmers is a major crisis goalpost in West Africa among other violence such as ethno-religious violence. The focus of this paper is to examine the extent of damages caused due to claims of right or greediness by the pastoralists and the farmers in the society. The relative deprivation theoretical framework is used to examine the question of the place of mutual respect, peaceful co-existence and good neighbourliness. The paper concludes on the premise of respecting boundaries between the graze and the farmland and the use of modern husbandry ranching instead of a nebulous nomadic system.

Author Biography

Opeyemi Idowu Aluko, Ajayi Crowther University, Oyo Town P. M. B 1066, Oyo State, Nigeria

PhD (political science); lecturer at the political science department

References

  1. Cline LE. Jihadist movements in the Sahel: rise of the Fulani? Terrorism and Political Violence. 2021;33:1–17. DOI: 10.1080/09546553.2021.1888082.
  2. Aluko OI. The “under carpet” syndrome of urban violence management in developing countries. Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies. 2021;21(1):139–149.
  3. Aluko OI. Agricultural policy and food security in Nigeria: a rational choice analysis. In: Osabuohien E, editor. The palgrave handbook of agricultural and rural development in Africa. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2020. p. 457–491.
  4. Aluko OI. Radicalising pastoralists and farmers in sustained violence: a theoretical construct [Internet; cited 2021 August 17]. Available from: https://dousingtensions.org/benuevalley.php.
  5. Aluko OI. Working within the laws: crop farming-pastoralism conundrum and convalescence in Nigeria [Internet; cited 2021 August 17]. Available from: https://dousingtensions.org/benuevalley.php.
  6. Aluko OI. Backdoor politics: permitting informalities for formal development in African democracy. TEME: Journal for Social Sciences. 2020;XLIV(1):209–229.
  7. Topher M, Talia H, Lisa I, Caitriona D, Stone C. The effect of farmer-pastoralist violence on state-level internal revenue generation in Nigeria: a modified synthetic control analysis approach [Internet; cited 2021 August 17]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279515083_The_Effect_of_Farmer-Pastoralist_Violence_on_State-Level_Internal_Revenue_Generation_in_Nigeria.
  8. Blench RM. “You can’t go home again”: pastoralism in the new millennium [Internet; cited 2021 August 17]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228379032_’You_can’t_go_home_again’_Pastoralism_in_the_new_millennium.
  9. Harroff-Tavel M. Violence and humanitarian action in urban areas: new challenges, new approaches [Internet; cited 2021 August 17]. Available from: https://international-review.icrc.org/sites/default/files/irrc-878-harroff-tavel.pdf.
  10. Aluko OI. Gang and urban violence prevalence on democratic sustenance. ABAC Journal. 2018;38(1):133–143.
  11. Gurr T. Why men rebel. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1970. 440 p.
  12. Aremu FA, Aluko OI. Tension in the paradise: a paradigm shift in urban violence in Nigeria. Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts. 2017;17(1):81–96.
  13. Akinwale A, Aderinto A. Crisis of governance and urban violence in Nigeria. African Journal of Criminology and Justice Studies. 2011;5(1–2):49–77.
  14. Aluko O, Isiaq A, Aremu F. Urban violence in Nigeria: the paradox and dimensions. In: Aytac O, Ozden O, editors. Political science and international relations, mass communication, law: proceeding book of the 3rd International conference on social sciences; 2017 May 10–11; Abuja, Nigeria. Abuja: Nile University of Nigeria; 2017. p. 80–98.
  15. Kunkeler J, Peters K. “The boys are coming to town”: youth, armed conflict and urban violence in developing countries. International Journal of Conflict and Violence. 2011;5(2):277–291. DOI: 10.4119/ijcv-2873.
  16. Koonings K, Kruijt D. Fractured cities: social exclusion, urban violence and contested spaces in Latin America. London: Zed; 2007. 176 p.
  17. Krause K, Muggah R, Gilgen E. Global burden of armed violence 2011. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. 175 p.
  18. Aluko OI. Urban violence dimension in Nigeria: farmer and herders. AGATHOS. 2017;8(1):187–206.
  19. Stouffer S, Suchman E, de Vinney L, Starr S, Williams R. The American soldier: adjustment to army life. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1949. 12 p.
  20. Cook D, Crosby J, Henningan M. The construct validity of relative deprivation. In: Sul JM, Miller RL, editors. Social comparative process: theoretical and emperical perspectives. Washington: Hemisphere; 1977. p. 307–333.
  21. Crosby J. A model of egocentric relative deprivation. Psychological Review. 1976;83(2):85–113.
  22. Walker I, Smith H. Fifty years of relative deprivation research. In: Walker I, Smith H, editors. Relative deprivation: specification, development and integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. p. 3–10.
  23. Tyler T, Linder A. Understanding the nature of fraternalistic deprivation: does group base deprivation involve fair outcome or fair treatments? In: Walker I, Smith H, editors. Relative deprivation: specification, development and integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. p. 44–68.
  24. Tougas F, Beaton A. Personal and group relative deprivation: connecting the “I” to the “We”. In: Walker I, Smith H, editors. Relative deprivation: specification, development and integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. p. 119–135.
  25. Crosby M, Ozawa K, Crosby F. Japanese and American reaction to gender discrimination. In: Walker I, Smith H, editors. Relative deprivation: specification, development and integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. p. 185–199.
  26. Aluko O. Policing election and electoral violence in developing democracies. Indian Philosophical Quarterly. 2016; 37(1–4):183–207.
  27. Aluko O. Security agents public perception in Nigeria: a study on the police and the vigilante (neighbourhood watch). Journal of Political Studies. 2016;23(2):481.
  28. Muhammed I, Ismaila A, Bibi U. An assessment of farmer-pastoralist conflict in Nigeria using GIS. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention. 2015;4(7):23–33.
  29. Awogbade M. Grazing reserves in Nigeria. Nomadic Peoples. 1987;23:18–30.
  30. Ibrahim A. Linking vision with reality in the implementation of policy framework for pastoralism in Nigeria [Internet; cited 2021 August 17]. Available from: https://pastoralismjournal.springeropen.com/track/pdf/10.1186/2041-7136-2-7.pdf.
  31. Earth Policy Institute. Livestock and human population in Nigeria from 1961–2008. FAOStat. 2012. November 26:52.
  32. Abbas M. No retreat no surrender conflict for survival between Fulani pastoralists and farmers in Northern Nigeria. European Scientific Journal. 2009;8(1):331–346.
  33. Nyong A. Climate related conflicts in West Africa [Internet; cited 2021 August 17]. Available from: https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/publication/ReportFromAfrica12.pdf.
  34. Odoh A, Chilaka C. Climate change and conflict in Nigeria: a theoretical and empirical examination of the worsening incidence of conflict between Fulani herdsmen and farmers in Northern Nigeria. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review. 2012;2(1):110–124.
  35. Okoli C, Atelhe A. Nomads against natives: a political ecology of herder/farmer conflicts in Nasarawa state, Nigeria. American International Journal of Contemporary Research. 2014;4(2):76–88.
  36. Aluko OI. Re-caging the Leviathan: of elephant, lion and cockroach. Nigerian Forum: Journal of the Nigerian Institute of International Affairs. 2019;40(12):528–539.
  37. Bello U. Herdsmen and farmers conflicts in North-Eastern Nigeria: causes, repercussions and resolutions. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. 2013;2(5):129–140.
Published
2021-12-10
Keywords: conflict, land dispute, pastoralism, rule of law, urban violence
How to Cite
Aluko, O. I. (2021). Pastoralists and farmers conflict: rights or greediness. Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations, 2, 17-25. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/internationalRelations/article/view/4225
Issue
No 2 (2021): Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations
Section
International relations

Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)