Bilateral relations between Belarus and the United States of America: a history of hopes and disappointments
Abstract
The history of the bilateral relations between Belarus and the United States from 1991 to 2020 was difficult and controversial. In 1991–1996 the relationship was positive and dynamic, extending to many areas from international security to humanitarian contacts and exchanges among people. After the 1996 referendum, the relationship soured. Washington adopted a policy of selective engagement, with limited dialogue with the government and more extensive support for humanitarian contacts, civil society and trade links. From 2013 to June 2020 Minsk and Washington took tentative steps towards normalcy, but in 2020 the dynamic reversed again.
References
- Rozanov A. [Republic of Belarus: foreign policy orientations]. In: Garnett Sh, Legvold R, editors. Belorussiya na pereput’e: v poiskakh mezhdunarodnoi identichnosti [Belarus at a crossroads: in search of international identity]. Moscow: Carnegie Moscow Centre; 1998. р. 51–56. Russian.
- Snapkouski U. Belarusian-Russian integration: the international context [Internet; cited 2022 January 15]. Available from: https://library.by/portalus/modules/beleconomics/readme.php?subaction=showfull&id=1465467612&archive=&start_from=&ucat=&. Russian.
- Snapkouski UE. [Belarusian-Russian integration and the West]. In: Snapkouski UE. Belaruska-rasijskija adnosiny [Belarusian-Russian relations]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2009. p. 55–69. Belarusian.
- Tikhomirov AV. [Interaction of the Republic of Belarus with the United States: a retrospective of the decade (1991–2001)]. In: Belarusian State University. Voprosy vneshnei politiki Respubliki Belarus’ [Questions of foreign policy of the Republic of Belarus]. Minsk: [s. n.]; 2001. p. 20–27. Russian.
- Tikhomirov AV. [Development of political dialogue between the Republic of Belarus and the United States in late 1991 – early 1994]. Trudy fakul’teta mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii BGU. 2012;3:67–71. Russian.
- Tikhomirov AV. [Relations of the Republic of Belarus with the United States]. In: Azarenko VV, editor. Respublika Belarus’ – 25 let sozidaniya i svershenii. Tom 4. Agropromyshlennyi kompleks. Arkhitektura i gradostroitel’stvo. Belarus’ na mirovoi arene [The Republic of Belarus – 25 years of creation and accomplishments. Volume 4. Agro-industrial complex. Architecture and urban planning. Belarus on the world stage]. Minsk: Belaruskaja navuka; 2020. p. 604–608. Russian.
- Kosov AP. [The evolution of Belarusian-American relations in 1991–1996]. In: Andarala AI, editor. Aktual’nyja prablemy stanawlennja i razviccja belaruskaj dzjarzhawnasci. Chastka 2. Gistoryja belaruskaj dzjarzhavy (1919 g. – pachatak XXI st.) [Actual problems of formation and development of the Belarusian statehood. Part 2. History of the Belarusian state (1919 – the beginning of the 21st century)]. Minsk: Belarusian State Pedagogical University named after Maxim Tank; 2009. p. 113–116. Russian.
- Legvold R. [Belarus in US foreign policy]. In: Garnett Sh, Legvold R, editors. Belorussiya na pereput’e: v poiskakh mezhdunarodnoi identichnosti [Belarus at a crossroads: in search of international identity]. Moscow: Carnegie Moscow Centre; 1998. р. 163–197. Russian.
- Cohen A. The U. S. should oppose dictatorship in Belarus [Internet; cited 2014 May 23]. Available from: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2004/10/the-us-should-oppose-dictatorship-in-belarus.
- Swartz D. Time for a radical change in U. S. relations with Belarus [Internet; cited 2014 May 23]. Available from: http://thepointjournal.com/output/index.php?art_id=235&spr_change=eng.
- Woehrel S. Belarus: background and U. S. policy сoncerns [Internet; cited 2014 May 23]. Available from: http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/142759.pdf.
- Wallander C. Belarus: a crucial step for a transformational U. S. foreign policy strategy [Internet; cited 2014 May 23]. Available from: https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/attachments/ts060309_wallender.pdf.
- Kravchenko PK. Belarus’ na rasput’e, ili pravda o Belovezhskom soglashenii. Zapiski diplomata i politika [Belarus at a crossroads, or the truth about the Belovezh agreement. Notes of the diplomat and politician]. Moscow: Vremya; 2006. 456 p. Russian.
- Rakashjevich UK, Sharapa AV, compilers. Zneshnjaja palityka Belarusi. Tom 7 [The foreign policy of Belarus. Volume 7]. Minsk: Publishing house of the Belarusian State University; 2004. 479 p. Belarusian.
- Tikhomirov AV. Vneshnyaya politika Respubliki Belarus’ v 1991–2015 gg. [The foreign policy of the Republic of Belarus in 1991–2015]. Minsk: Publishing house of the Belarusian State University; 2017. 208 p. Russian.
- Gramer R, Mackinnon A. A diplomatic breakthrough for Washington in Europe’s last dictatorship [Internet; cited 2014 May 23]. Available from: https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/01/10/diplomatic-breakthrough-for-washington-in-europeslast-dictatorship-belarus-warming-relations-with-west-united-states-lukashenko-putin-russia-dispute-diplomacystate-department-eastern-europe/.
- Melyantsov D. Pompeo day: what’s in the dry residue? [Internet; cited 2021 May 20]. Available from: https://minskdialogue.by/research/opinions/den-pompeo-chto-v-sukhom-ostatke/. Russian.
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)