Non-state actors as quasi-subjects of transnational organised crime: implications for the security of states
Abstract
We discuss the legal status of non-state actors in the context of the global fight against transnational organised crime and the security of states. We address the topic from the perspectives of international law (including criminal law), international security and human rights. We conclude that non-state actors such as multinational corporations, private military and security companies, and non-governmental organisations may become quasi-actors of transnational organised crime. Contributing to this probability are their uncertain legal status under international law, certain corporate practices and attitudes, obscure financial flows, and vulnerability of international and national public authorities to corrupt practices, among others.
References
- Douhan A. Mezhdunarodnye organizatsii i podderzhanie mezhdunarodnogo mira i bezopasnosti [International organisations and the maintenance of international peace and security]. Minsk: MITSO; 2016. 262 p. Russian.
- Hoffman FG. Conflict in the 21st century: the rise of hybrid wars. Arlington: Potomac Institute for Policy Studies; 2007. p. 17–35.
- von Clausewitz C. On war. Howard ME, Paret P, translators. New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 1984. 752 p.
- Turley J. Big money behind war: military-industrial complex. Aljazeera [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2021 January 2]. Available from: https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2014/1/11/big-money-behind-war-the-military-industrial-complex.
- de Balzac H. Le Père Goriot. In: Œuvres complètes de H. de Balzac. Paris: A. Houssiaux; 1855. p. 303–531.
- Kruessmann T. Human rights in combating organised crime and the problem of “illegal” migration in Europe. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Law. 2020;3:24–29.
- Shelley L. The threat to world order. In: Torr JD, editor. Organised crime. San Diego: Greenhaven Press; 1999. p. 173–181. (Contemporary issues companion).
- Boguslavskii MM. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo [Private international law]. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya; 1994. 416 p. Russian.
- Woters J, Chané AL. Multinational corporations in international law [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2021 January 2]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272241501_Multinational_Corporations_in_International_Law. (KU Leuven Working Paper; No. 129). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2371216.
- Tait N. Costs settlement brings to an end record-breaking BCCI litigation 12-year action. Financial Times. 2006 June 8.
- Westra L. The supranational corporation: beyond the multinationals. Boston: Brill; 2013. 220 p. (Studies in Critical Social Sciences; volume 53).
- Ruvinskii RZ. Pravoporyadok v period global’nogo krizisa: transformatsii, tendentsii, ugrozy [Legal order in times of global crisis: transformations, trends, threats]. Saint Petersburg: Aleteiya; 2020. 350 p. Russian.
- Coady CAJ. Mercenary morality. In: Bradney AGD, editor. International law and armed conflict: 16th annual conference; 1990 April 5–7; Leicester, Great Britain. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner; 1992. p. 55–71.
- Singer PW. Corporate warriors: the rise of the privatised military industry. New York: Cornell University Press; 2007. 351 p.
- Moller D. Privatisation of conflict, security and war. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2021 January 2]. 41 p. (DIIS Working paper; No. 2005/2). Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep13435.
- Gielink D, Buitenhuis M, Moelker R. No contractors on the battlefield: the Dutch military’s reluctance to outsource. In: Jäger T, Kümmel G. Private military and security companies: chances, problems, pitfalls and prospects. Wiesbaden: Springer VS; 2007. p. 149–165. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-90313-2_10.
- Cameron L. Private military companies: their status under international humanitarian law and its impact on their regulation. International Review of the Red Cross. 2006;88(863):573–598.
- MacLeod S. Private security companies and shared responsibility: the turn to multistakeholder standard-setting and monitoring through self-regulation-“plus”. Netherlands International Law Review. 2015;62:119–140. DOI: 10.1007/s40802-015-0017-y.
- Mitchell S. Becoming legitimate: how PMSCs are seeking legitimacy in the international system [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 December 25]. Available from: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7197.
- Mandel R. Armies without states: the privatisation of security. London: Lynne Reinner Publishers; 2002. 169 p.
- Stillman GB. Global standard NGOs: the essential elements of good practice. Geneva: Grant B. Stillman; 2007. 92 p.
- Hager EB, Mazzetti M. Emirates secretly sends Colombian mercenaries to Yemen fight. New York Times [Internet]. 2015 November 25 [cited 2022 January 20]. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/26/world/middleeast/emirates-secretly-sends-colombian-mercenaries-to-fight-in-yemen.html.
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)