Harmonisation and unification and their influence on the evolution of national legal systems
Abstract
The author of the article explores the concepts of harmonisation and unification. Both are used in legal texts and doctrinal sources, but the distinctions among them and the implications for the evolution of the national legal systems are still poorly understood. The aim of the research is to clarify the similarities and differences between these and related concepts and understand how the processes to which they refer influence legal change. It is concluded that harmonisation and unification are uneven and fragmentary processes, even though they are often equated. National legal systems retain substantial differences and specificities precluding the assimilation of many legal norms from other jurisdictions and creating formidable barriers to harmonisation. We also find that shared history, legal traditions and commonalities in the legal order and elements of legislation facilitate harmonisation, and international organisations lay the groundwork for harmonisation. We present examples of successes in the unification of material and procedural law and highlight the essential role of supranational bodies such as the Court of Justice of the European Union and the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union in the uniform application and interpretation of the common rules.
References
- Garoupa N, Ogus A. A strategic interpretation of legal transplants [Internet; cited 2022 April 10]. Available from: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/424.
- van Gerven W. Harmonisation of private law: do we need it? Common Market Law Review. 2004;41(2):505–532. DOI: 10.54648/cola2004005.
- Ghetti R. Unification, harmonisation and competition in European company forms. European Business Law Review. 2018;29(5):813–842.
- Zhmurko IM. [Convergence of national legislations as a significant factor for subregional cooperation]. In: Abashidze A, editor. Aktualʼnye problemy sovremennogo mezhdunarodnogo prava: sbornik materialov XV mezhdunarodnogo kongressa «Blishchenkovskie chteniya»; 22 aprelya 2017 g.; Moskva, Rossiya. Chastʼ 1 [Topical problems of modern international law: collection of materials of 15th international congress “Blishchenkovskie chteniya”; 2017 April 22; Moscow, Russia. Part 1]. Moscow: RUDN University; 2018. p. 574–578. Russian.
- Krymsky DI. Harmonisation of civil procedure in European Union countries: achieved results and perspectives for the development. Rossiiskii ezhegodnik grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo protsessa. 2009;8:218–233. Russian.
- Marchenko MN, Deryabina EM. Pravovaya sistema Evropeiskogo soyuza [Legal system of the European Union]. Moscow: Norma; 2015. 704 p. Co-published by the Infra-M. Russian.
- Pavlova LV. [International law in states’ legal systems]. Belorusskii zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava i mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. 1999;3:3–9. Russian.
- Chirkin VE. Global legal systems, legal families and their classification. Law. Journal of Higher School of Economics. 2017;4:18–30. Russian. DOI: 10.17323/2072-8166.2017.4.18.30.
- Chirkin VE. Modern legal systems: mutual influence, convergence and antagonisms. RUDN Journal of Law. 2014;2:118–131. Russian.
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)