Harmonisation and unification and their influence on the evolution of national legal systems

  • Darya S. Ponomareva Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

Abstract

The author of the article explores the concepts of harmonisation and unification. Both are used in legal texts and doctrinal sources, but the distinctions among them and the implications for the evolution of the national legal systems are still poorly understood. The aim of the research is to clarify the similarities and differences between these and related concepts and understand how the processes to which they refer influence legal change. It is concluded that harmonisation and unification are uneven and fragmentary processes, even though they are often equated. National legal systems retain substantial differences and specificities precluding the assimilation of many legal norms from other jurisdictions and creating formidable barriers to harmonisation. We also find that shared history, legal traditions and commonalities in the legal order and elements of legislation facilitate harmonisation, and international organisations lay the groundwork for harmonisation. We present examples of successes in the unification of material and procedural law and highlight the essential role of supranational bodies such as the Court of Justice of the European Union and the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union in the uniform application and interpretation of the common rules.

Author Biography

Darya S. Ponomareva, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

postgraduate student at the department of international law, faculty of international relations

References

  1. Garoupa N, Ogus A. A strategic interpretation of legal transplants [Internet; cited 2022 April 10]. Available from: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/424.
  2. van Gerven W. Harmonisation of private law: do we need it? Common Market Law Review. 2004;41(2):505–532. DOI: 10.54648/cola2004005.
  3. Ghetti R. Unification, harmonisation and competition in European company forms. European Business Law Review. 2018;29(5):813–842.
  4. Zhmurko IM. [Convergence of national legislations as a significant factor for subregional cooperation]. In: Abashidze A, editor. Aktualʼnye problemy sovremennogo mezhdunarodnogo prava: sbornik materialov XV mezhdunarodnogo kongressa «Blishchenkovskie chteniya»; 22 aprelya 2017 g.; Moskva, Rossiya. Chastʼ 1 [Topical problems of modern international law: collection of materials of 15th international congress “Blishchenkovskie chteniya”; 2017 April 22; Moscow, Russia. Part 1]. Moscow: RUDN University; 2018. p. 574–578. Russian.
  5. Krymsky DI. Harmonisation of civil procedure in European Union countries: achieved results and perspectives for the development. Rossiiskii ezhegodnik grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo protsessa. 2009;8:218–233. Russian.
  6. Marchenko MN, Deryabina EM. Pravovaya sistema Evropeiskogo soyuza [Legal system of the European Union]. Moscow: Norma; 2015. 704 p. Co-published by the Infra-M. Russian.
  7. Pavlova LV. [International law in states’ legal systems]. Belorusskii zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava i mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. 1999;3:3–9. Russian.
  8. Chirkin VE. Global legal systems, legal families and their classification. Law. Journal of Higher School of Economics. 2017;4:18–30. Russian. DOI: 10.17323/2072-8166.2017.4.18.30.
  9. Chirkin VE. Modern legal systems: mutual influence, convergence and antagonisms. RUDN Journal of Law. 2014;2:118–131. Russian.
Published
2022-12-16
Keywords: harmonisation, unification, convergence, national legislation, international law, private international law
How to Cite
Ponomareva, D. S. (2022). Harmonisation and unification and their influence on the evolution of national legal systems. Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations, 2, 39-43. https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6848-2022-2-39-43