International transport corridors in South Asia: geopolitical problems

  • Yury A. Shcharbina Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

Abstract

The difficulties and geopolitical constraints for international transport corridors in South Asia are studied. The present barriers to their operation and expansion, such as infrastructural deficits, political instability, and geopolitical restraint are discovered. The impact of geopolitics on regional trade and economic development is also discussed, along with the contribution of regional and global players to the resolution of security and stability issues. A review of the intricate geopolitical dynamics of the transit corridors revealed significant issues and conflicts amongst the states in the region. Opportunities are identified for the Eurasian Economic Union to reroute its cargo flows in response to Western sanctions presented by the International North – South transport corridor, Indian projects “Act East” and “Neighbourhood first”, and the China – Pakistan economic corridor.

Author Biography

Yury A. Shcharbina, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

postgraduate student at the department of international relations, faculty of international relations

References

  1. Erdősi F. Global and regional roles of the Russian transport infrastructures. Discussion papers / Centre for regional studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. 2008;69:28–48.
  2. Torin А. Russian-Indian dialogue: in search of new formats of cooperation [Internet; cited 2022 December 30]. Available from: https://interaffairs.ru/news/show/23466. Russian.
  3. Vinokurov E, Ahunbaev A, Zaboev A. International North – South transport corridor: boosting Russia’s “pivot to the South” and trans-Eurasian connectivity. Russian Journal of Economics. 2022;8(2):159–173. DOI: 10.32609/j.ruje.8.86617.
  4. Karavaev А, Tisheh’yar М. Mezhdunarodnyi transportnyi koridor “Sever – Yug” i stsenarii transregional’noi integratsii [International transport corridor “North – South” and scenarios of transregional integration]. Moscow: [s. n.]; 2019. 35 p. Russian.
  5. Vinokurov E, Ahunbaev A, Zaboev A, Shashkenov M. The International North – South transport corridor: promoting Eurasia’s intra- and transcontinental connectivity. Report 21/5. Moscow: EDB Centre for Infrastructure and Industrial Research; 2021. 119 p.
  6. Migulin PP. Zheleznodorozhnye zaimy i zheleznodorozhnaya politika (1893–1902 gg.) [Rail loans and rail policy (1893–1902)]. Kharkiv: Pechatnoe delo; 1903. 360 p. Russian.
  7. Pierre G. New developments in India – Myanmar bilateral relations? Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs. 2015;34(2):139–163. DOI: 10.1177/186810341503400206.
  8. Sadjanhar А. [India’s “Act East” policy – challenges and opportunities]. In: Zapesotskii AS, Markov AP, Kaisarov UL, Cheberko UF, Paseshnikova LA, Solod OV, et al., editors. Sovremennye global’nye vyzovy i natsional’nye interesy. XVI Mazhdunarodnye Likhachevskie chteniya; 19–21 maya 2016 g.; Sankt-Peterburg, Rossiya [Modern global challenges and national interests. 16th International Likhachev readings; 2016 May 19–21; Saint Petersburg, Russia]. Saint Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskii gumanitarnyi universitet profsoyuzov; 2016. p. 217–220. Russian.
  9. Rogozhina NG. India and ASEAN – a new stage of cooperation [Internet; cited 2022 December 30]. Available from: https://www.imemo.ru/news/events/text/indiya-i-asean-noviy-etap-sotrudnichestva?ret=640. Russian.
  10. Baruah DM. India’s answer to the Belt and Road: a road map for South Asia [Internet; cited 2022 December 30]. Available from: https://carnegieindia.org/2018/08/21/india-s-answer-to-belt-and-road-road-map-for-south-asia-pub-77071.
  11. Brahina ЕА. Economic relations of India with the countries of Southeast Asia – foreign trade aspect. Yugo-Vostochnaya Aziya: aktual'nye problemy razvitiya. 2021;1:66–72. Russian. DOI: 10.31696/2072-8271-2021-1-1-50-066-072.
  12. Chunjiao Yu, Ren Zhang, Lian An, Zhixing Yu. Has China’s Belt and Road initiative intensified bilateral trade links between China and the involved countries? Sustainability. 2020;12:[19]. DOI: 10.3390/su12176747.
  13. Rashid Menhas, Shahid Mahmood, Papel Tanchangya, Muhammad Nabeel Safdar, Safdar Hussain. Sustainable development under Belt and Road initiative: a case study of China – Pakistan economic corridor’s socio-economic impact on Pakistan. Sustainability. 2019;11:[24]. DOI: 10.3390/su11216143.
  14. Choudhury A, Moorthy P. Strategic-maritime triangle in the Indian Ocean: an emerging Indo-US naval entente? India Quarterly: a Journal of International Affairs. 2018;74(3):305–325. DOI: 10.1177/0974928418785477.
  15. Khalid Mehmood Alam, Xuemei Li, Saranjam Baig. Impact of transport cost and travel time on trade under China – Pakistan economic corridor. Journal of Advanced Transportation. 2019;2:[16]. DOI: 10.1155/2019/7178507.
  16. Shamsa Kanwal, Abdul Hameed Pitafi, Muhammad Yousaf Malik, Naseer Abbas Khan, Rao Muhammad Rashid. Local Pakistani citizens’ benefits and attitudes toward China – Pakistan economic corridor projects. SAGE Open. 2020;10(3):[16]. DOI: 10.1177/2158244020942759.
  17. Malevich YuI, Rumyantsev EE. [China – Pakistan economic corridor as a new form of bilateral cooperation]. In: Gaisenok VA, editor. Filosofsko-gumanitarnye nauki. Vypusk 18 [Philosophical and humanitarian sciences. Issue 18]. Minsk: National Institute for Higher Education; 2019. p. 185–193. Russian.
  18. Ahmad Saad, Guan Xinping, Mariah Ijaz. China – Pakistan economic corridor and its influence on perceived economic and social goals: implications for social policy makers. Sustainability. 2019;11:[20]. DOI: 10.3390/su11184949.
  19. Zamaraeva N. China – Pakistan economic corridor: status 2020–2021. China in World and Regional Politics. History and Modernity. 2021;26:164–178. Russian. DOI: 10.24412/2618-6888-2021-26-164-178.
  20. Serenko I. China – Pakistan economic corridor in Eurasia integration processes. Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii. 2019;2:172–175. Russian.
  21. Inayat K. China – Pakistan economic corridor – a geo-economic masterstroke of China. A Research Journal of South Asian Studies. 2017;32(2):461–475.
  22. Chzhan Yu-Lin. [Intersection of interests of China and India in South Asia]. In: Dostanko EA, editor. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya: istoriya, teoriya, praktika. Materialy XI nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii molodykh uchenykh; 4 fevralya 2021 g.; Minsk, Belarus’ [International relations: history, theory, practice. Materials of 11th scientific and practical conference of young scientists; 2021 February 4; Minsk, Belarus]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2021. p. 84–89. Russian.
  23. Muhammad Tayyab Safdar, Zabin J. Pakistan and the Belt and Road: new horizons for a globalised RMB [Internet; cited 2022 December 30]. Available from: https://thediplomat.com/2020/09/pakistan-and-the-belt-and-road-new-horizons-for-aglobalized-rmb/.
  24. Shah AZ. Geopolitical significance of Balochistan: interplay of foreign actors. Strategic Studies. 2017;31(3):126–144. DOI: 10.53532/ss.037.03.00213.
  25. Saleem AH. CPEC and Balochistan: prospects of socio-political stability. Strategic Studies. 2017;37(4):118–132.
  26. Syed Amir Anwar, Zhang Wuyi, Syed Zahid Ali Shah, Quadrat Ullah, Syed Muhammad Amir, Ammara Syed. The resilient economic impact of CPEC and future of MNCs: evidence from Pakistan. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2022;10:[14]. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.912975.
Published
2023-06-27
Keywords: South Asia, Pakistan, India, international relations, geopolitics
How to Cite
Shcharbina, Y. A. (2023). International transport corridors in South Asia: geopolitical problems. Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations, 1, 41-51. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/internationalRelations/article/view/5405