The meaning, origins and relevance of information sovereignty

  • Aleksei V. Ivantsov Academy of Public Administration under the President of the Republic of Belarus, 17 Maskouskaja Street, Minsk 220007, Belarus

Abstract

Increasingly, national mechanisms for ensuring information sovereignty have been gaining significance in Russia and Belarus, given the widespread use of the Internet in daily life, the growth of online audiences, and the integration of IT into many aspects and new areas of social interactions. The importance of information sovereignty was amplified by the progress of digital integration, and also by the activity of international organisations. For example, national security is mentioned as one of the tenets of digital integration in the Eurasian Economic Union’s fundamental objectives for the advancement of the digital agenda until 2025. The primary focus of the information security concept now being created in the Union State is the members’ territorial integrity. There has not been a common, widely accepted Concept of information sovereignty to date, calling for a comprehensive academic review of the underlying phenomenon in the modern state. An academic examination of information sovereignty and related topics, including their historical development and current understandings, is presented. We analyse the theoretical and normative interpretations of information sovereignty as they relate to the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus, and derive various insights that enhance the understanding of information sovereignty as a unique concept in political science, clarify its attributes and the three stages in the evolution of its understanding.

Author Biography

Aleksei V. Ivantsov, Academy of Public Administration under the President of the Republic of Belarus, 17 Maskouskaja Street, Minsk 220007, Belarus

applicant at the department of social policy and ideology of Institute of Public Service

References

  1. Rossoshanskii AV. Political aspects of information security. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. 2007;7(2):116–121. Russian.
  2. Efremov AA. Formation of the concept of information sovereignty of the state. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2017;1:201–215. Russian. DOI: 10.17323/2072-8166.2017.1.201.215.
  3. Kefeli IF, Malmberg SA. State information capacity as information sovereignty basis. Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie. 2019;1:29–39. Russian. DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2019-1-29-39.
  4. Kucheryavyi MM. State policy on information sovereignty of Russia in the modern global world. Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie. 2015;2:7–14. Russian.
  5. Levin ID. Suverenitet [Sovereignty]. Moscow: Yuridicheskii tsentr press; 2003. 371 p. Russian.
  6. Shavtsova-Varfolomeeva AV. Teoreticheskie osnovy gosudarstvennogo suvereniteta Respubliki Belarus’, ego pravovoe obespechenie [Theoretical foundations of the state sovereignty of the Republic of Belarus, and its legal enforcement]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2016. 183 p. Russian.
  7. Andrichenko LV, Krylov BS, Ilyinskii IP, Mikhaleva NA, Sukhalo AE. Problemy suvereniteta v Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Issues of sovereignty in the Russian Federation]. Мoscow: Respublika; 1994. 175 p. Russian.
  8. Lebedeva MM. [The world political system: manifestations of the “extra-systemic” or new actors – old rules]. In: Lebedeva MM, editor. “Privatizatsiya” mirovoi politiki: lokal’nye deistviya – global’nye rezul’taty [“Privatisation” of world politics: local actions – global results]. Moscow: Golden Bi; 2008. p. 53–66. Russian.
  9. Wirth GF. Khronika Ura Linda. Drevneishaya istoriya Evropy [The chronicle of Uro Lind. Ancient history of Europe]. Moscow: Veche; 2019. 624 p. Russian.
  10. Grotius G. O prave voiny i mira [On the law of war and peace]. Krylov SV, editor. Moscow: Ladomir; 1994. 868 p. Russian.
  11. Machiavelli N. Gosudar’ [The prince]. Moscow: Planeta; 1998. 230 p. Russian.
  12. Locke J. Dva traktata o gosudarstvennom pravlenii [Two treatises on state government]. Moscow: Sotsium; 2020. 420 p. Russian.
  13. Bodin J. [Six books on the state]. In: Semigin G, editor. Antologiya mirovoi politicheskoi mysli. Tom 2. Zarubezhnaya politicheskaya mysl’. XX vek [Anthology of world political thought. Volume 2. Foreign political thought. 20th century]. Moscow: Mysl’; 1999. p. 689–695. Russian.
  14. Daisy AV. Osnovy gosudarstvennogo prava Anglii [Fundamentals of state law in England]. Vinogradov OV, translator. Мoscow: Tipogrfiya tovarishchestva I. D. Sytina; 1905. 658 p. Russian.
  15. Grinin LE. [Globalisation and national sovereignty]. Istoriya i sovremennost’. 2005;1:6–31. Russian.
  16. Ivantsov AV. Information security systems of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation in modern conditions. Labour. Trade Unions. Society. 2022;3:90–96. Russian.
  17. Krylov GO, Lazarev VM, Lyubimov AE. [International experience in the legal regulation of information security and the possibilities for its integrated use in the Russian Federation]. Legal Informatics. 2013;3:15–28. Russian.
  18. Panarin IN. Tekhnologiya informatsionnoi voiny [Information warfare technology]. Moscow: KSP+; 2003. 320 p. Russian.
Published
2023-12-19
Keywords: information sovereignty, concept, doctrine, genesis, national interests, information security, threats, challenges, risks
How to Cite
Ivantsov, A. V. (2023). The meaning, origins and relevance of information sovereignty. Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations, 2, 33-38. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/internationalRelations/article/view/5681