A hidden function of US secondary sanctions: blocking the right to development

Authors

  • Michael J. Strauss Centre d’Etudes Diplomatiques et Stratégiques, 10 rue Sextius Michel, Paris 75015, France

Keywords:

secondary sanctions, anti-competitive measures, restrictive business practices, United States, UNCTAD

Abstract

This article strengthens existing arguments that US secondary sanctions violate international law. It proposes that they constitute a restrictive business practice that obstructs the right to development. Such sanctions penalise trade and competition that economists consider essential for development. By deterring foreign companies from doing business with states or major economic actors targeted by US primary sanctions, secondary sanctions effectively reserve the target’s market for US companies once sanctions are lifted. Secondary sanctions, operating internationally, meet the definition of restrictive business practices that the UN Conference on trade and development has sought to curtail domestically. It may therefore offer a mechanism for challenging them on such grounds. 

Author Biography

  • Michael J. Strauss, Centre d’Etudes Diplomatiques et Stratégiques, 10 rue Sextius Michel, Paris 75015, France

    doctor of philosophy (international relations and diplomacy); professor of international law and international relations

References

  1. Köchler H, editor. Economic sanctions and development. Vienna: International Progress Organization; 1997. 24 p.
  2. Ruys T, Ryngaert C. Secondary sanctions: a weapon out of control? The international legality of, and European rlesponses to, US secondary sanctions. British Yearbook of International Law. 2020;2020:1–116. DOI: 10.1093/bybil/braa007.
  3. Terry PCR. Secondary sanctions: why the US approach is unlawful and the EU’s response is ineffective. Global Trade and Customs Journal. 2022;17(9):370–379. DOI: 10.54648/gtcj2022052.
  4. Strauss MJ. The (il)legality of unilateral sanctions in light of the inadequacy of humanitarian exemptions. Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations. 2021;1:86–97.
  5. De Vries BA. The export performance of developing countries. Finance and Development. 1968;5:2–7.
  6. Alexander K. Economic sanctions: law and public policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009. 359 p.
  7. Douhan A, editor. Humanitarian impact of unilateral sanctions and over-compliance: theoretical challenges and practical implications. Paris: Académie de Géopolitique de Paris; 2025. 324 p.
  8. Poblete L, Havila V, Anderson H, Gidhagen M, Medlin CJ. Resuming business operations after a Hiatus: the case of reappearing relationships. Industrial Marketing Management. 2022;106:256–266. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.09.002.
  9. Dauda S. The effects of competition on jobs and economic transformation. Washington: World Bank; 2020. 42 p.
  10. Asadzade Z. The importance of competition in the formation of a favorable business environment. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Economy. 2024;2:1–11. DOI: 10.31435/rsglobal_ijite/30062024/8146.
  11. Qaqaya H, Lipimile G, editors. The effects of anti-competitive business practices on developing countries and their development prospects. New York: United Nations; 2008. 659 p.
  12. Levenstein M, Suslow VY. Contemporary international cartels and developing countries: economic effects and implications for competition policy. Antitrust Law Journal. 2004;3:801–852.
  13. Teshome RG. The draft convention on the right to development: a new dawn to the recognition of the right to development as a human right? Human Rights Law Review. 2022;22(2):1–24.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-20

Issue

No. 2 (2025): Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations

Section

International Law

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)

How to Cite

[1]
Strauss, M.J. 2025. A hidden function of US secondary sanctions: blocking the right to development. Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations. 2 (Dec. 2025), 21–25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6848-2025-2-%p.