Instituteʼs of reading communication resources in the digital age
Abstract
The problem of the significance of reading as a socio-cultural institution is considered. Today, reading-this traditional, centuries-old form of everyday intellectual activities in the context of self-development of individuals, is experiencing serious problems, primarily due to the widespread digitalisation of mass media content. The transformation of technologies and practices for the production of multimedia texts should not, as it is proved, push the meaning-value components of modern mass media activity into the background. And it is through the use of communicative reading resources in general and systematic work to promote individual high-quality texts, in particular, that the functions of journalism can be successfully implemented even in the digital age. This type of social activity contributes to the free spiritual unity of people, which can only be achieved under the influence of art, literature and argumentative journalism. Using the data of their sociological research, the authors conclude that the principles of «attracting, not retaining attention», «pictorial, not meaning-making», which are followed today by many mass media, as well as most subjects of information activity in social networks, do not contribute to the personal and intellectual development of mass audience members. After all, intentions are most often caused by economic dominants and reflect only the current agenda. Consequently, this brings to the fore the problem of developing practical skills through the Institute of reading, especially for young generations, to work with voluminous, informational and conceptually rich texts of printed and online publications. In the intergenerational cultural and civilizational interaction Institute for reading is an important communicative resource, as it plays a bridging role, shaping not only the dialogue relations, but also implements specific, needed more than ever today, media education learning technologies text twist, conflict manipulation, and the ability to identify the main, essential in ever-increasing volume of information flow.
References
- Gudova MYu. Chtenie v epokhu postgramotnosti: kul’turologicheskii analiz [Reading in the age of post-literacy: a cultural analysis] [dissertation]. Yekaterinburg: Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin; 2015. 329 p. Russian.
- Zaitzev АS. Creating a reading culture [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 March 10]. Available from: http://www.proshkolu.ru/user/alex-279z/file/3134231/. Russian.
- McLuhan M. Galaktika Guttenberga. Sotvorenie cheloveka pechatnoi kul’tury [The Gutenberg galaxy. Becoming a human printer]. Yudin A, editor. Кyiv: Nika-Zentr; 2004. 432 p. Russian.
- Hradzushka AA. Regional media in the digital age of journalism: sociological research. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Journalism and Pedagogics. 2019;1:36–46. Russian.
- Panizzon M.A three-level evaluation process of cultural readiness for strategic foresight projects. World Futures Review. 2019;11(4):331–350. DOI: 10.1177/1946756719862115.
- Zhuravlev AL, Ushakov DV, Kholodnaya MA, editors. Sovremennye issledovaniya intellekta i tvorchestva [Modern research on intelligence and creativity]. Moscow: Institute of Psychology Russian Academy of Sciences; 2015. 608 p. Russian.
- Runco MA, Acar S, Tang M, Hao N, Yang J. The social «cost» of working in groups and impact of values and creativity. Creativity: Theories – Research – Applications. 2016;3(2):229–243. DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2016-0015.
- Gudova MYu, Rubzova ЕV. Communication trends under the conditions of cultural-civilizational revolution. Izvestiya Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta. Seriya 1. Problemy obrazovaniya, nauki i kul’tury. 2018;24(3):172–176. Russian.
- Gendina NI. Lingvisticheskie sredstva institutov pamyati: bibliotek, arkhivov, muzeev i organizatsii smezhnykh sfer deyatel’nosti [Linguistic tools of memory institutions: libraries, archives, museums and organizations of related fields of activity]. Moscow: Litera; 2016. 398 p. Russian.
- Sanders J,Alberts P. Multimodal Literacies. In: Alberts P, Sanders J, editors. Literacies, the arts and multimodality. [S. l.]: NCTE, K-College; 2010. p. 1–25.
- Bahtin ММ. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected works]. Moscow: IMLI RAN; 1996–2012. Russian.
- Eco U. Ot dreva k labirintu. Istoricheskie issledovaniya znaka i interpretatsii [From the tree to the labyrinth. Historical studies of the sign and interpretation]. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt; 2016. 559 p. Russian.
- Manovich L. Teorii soft-kul’tury [Theories of soft culture]. Nizhnii Novgorod: Krasnaya lastochka; 2017. 208 p. Russian.
- Assman Y. Kul’turnaya pamyat’. Pis’mo, pamyat’ o proshlom i politicheskaya identichnost’ v vysokikh kul’turakh drevnosti [Cultural memory. Writing, memory of the past and political identity in high ancient cultures]. Moscow: Yaziki slavyanskoi kultury; 2004. 368 p. Russian.
- Assmann A. Cultural memory and western civilization: functions, media, archives. Cambridge: Cambridge UP; 2012. 424 p.
- Dubin Boris. [34 % of Russians with higher education have never read a book. And they don’t want to]. Novaya gazeta. 2010 June 28. Russian.
- The Levada Center. Press release [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 March 1]. Available from: https://www.levada.ru/2019/07/01/dosug-i-razvlecheniya. Russian.
- Derikot N. Why are the humanities dying and classical philology is a radical political act [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 February 24]. Available from: https://knife.media/humanities-dying. Russian.
- Aro M, Olkinuora E. Riding the information highway – towards a new kind of learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education. 2007;26(4):385–398. DOI: 10.1080/02601370701417145.
- Zdravomyslov AG. Sotsiologiya konflikta [Sociology of conflict]. Moscow: Aspekt Press; 1996. 317 p. Russian.
- Stefanovskaya NA. Reading as a spiritual value (based on the results of research in the Lipetsk and Tambov regions) [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 January 21].Available from: http://www.library.ru/1/sociolog/text/article.php?a_uid=248. Russian.
- Oleshko VF. [Reading as a democratic value]. Izvestiya Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta. Seriya 1. Problemy obrazovaniya, nauki i kul’tury. 2015;2:76–84. Russian.
- Oskin Aleksandr. The future of the press in the USA, UK and Russia [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2019 December 22]. Available from: https://echo.msk.ru/blog/oskin/1610612-echo/. Russian.
- Luman N. Real’nost’ massmedia [The reality of the mass media]. Moscow: Praxis; 2005. 256 p. Russian.
- Drakokhrust Yuri. Half of Belarusians do not read books. Who is to blame, what to do and how are our neighbors doing? [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 March 12]. Available from: https://news.tut.by/culture/610213.html. Russian.
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Journalism and Pedagogics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:
- The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
- The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
- The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)