Справедливость приговора суда

Валенина Николаевна Бибило

Валенина Николаевна Бибило Белорусский государственный университет, пр. Независимости, 4, 220030, г. Минск, Беларусь

Аннотация

Справедливость приговора суда обеспечивается взаимодействием социальных регуляторов правосудия по уголовным делам и зависит от двух факторов, один из которых – законодательство, а другой – усмотрение судьи. Справедливость процедуры рассмотрения уголовного дела создает условия для вынесения справедливого приговора. Справедливость приговора основывается на установлении юридической истины.

Биография автора

Валенина Николаевна Бибило, Белорусский государственный университет, пр. Независимости, 4, 220030, г. Минск, Беларусь

доктор юридических наук, профессор; профессор кафедры уголовного процесса и прокурорского надзора юридического факультета

Литература

Ekimov AI. [Law in the context of justice: toward a research methodology]. Pravovedenie. 2013;2:51–61. Russian.
Hegel G. Filosofiya prava [Philosophy of law]. Moskow: Mysl’; 1990. 524 p. Russian.
Aristotle. Etika. Politika. Ritorika. Poetika. Kategorii [Ethics. Politics. Rhetoric. Poetics. Categories]. Minsk: Literatura; 1998. 1391 p. Russian.
Perelman H. [Three aspects of justice]. Pravovedenie. 2013;2:211–225. Russian.
Heffe O. Spravedlivost’ [Justice]. Kildyushov OV, translator. Moscow: Praxis; 2007. 192 p. Russian.
Rawls D. Teoriya spravedlivosti [Theory of justice]. Novosibirsk: Publishing House of Novosibirsk University; 1995. 536 p. Russian.
Bibilo VN. [Discovering the truth in criminal procedure]. In: Pavlov VI, Savenok AL, editors. Chelovek i pravo: problema tsennostnykh osnovanii pravovogo regulirovaniya [Man and law: the problem of value bases of legal regulation]. Minsk: The Academy of the Interior Ministry; 2019. p. 255–260. Russian.
Kelsen G. [Law, state and justice in the pure theory of law]. Pravovedenie. 2013;2:226–240. Russian.
Berbeshkina ZA. Spravedlivost’ kak sotsial’no-filosofskaya kategoriya [Justice as a socio-philosophical category]. Moscow: Mysl’; 1983. 204 p. Russian.
Pautov A. [Implementation of the principle of justice in judicial practice]. Sudovy vesnik. 2019;2:15–19. Russian.
Danilyuk SE. [Justice as a constitutional and legal category]. Vesnik Kanstytucyjnaga Suda Rjespubliki Belarus’. 2019;1:47–64. Russian.
Presnyakov MV. Konstitutsionnyi printsip spravedlivosti: yuridicheskaya priroda i normativnoe soderzhanie [Constitutional principle of justice: legal nature and normative content] [dissertation abstract]. Saratov: Saratov State University; 2010. 45 p. Russian.
Shkredova EG, Mullahmetova NE, Magankova AA. Printsip spravedlivosti: teoriya i praktika primeneniya sudami pri rassmotrenii ugolovnykh del [The principle of justice: theory and practice of application by the courts in criminal cases]. Moscow: Yurlitinform; 2016. 168 p. Russian.
Babaev VK, editor. Obshchaya teoriya prava [General theory of law]. Nizhny Novgorod: Higher School of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation; 1993. 544 p. Russian.
Ashirova LM. Problemy realizatsii printsipa spravedlivosti v ugolovnom protsesse [Problems of implementing the principle of justice in criminal proceedings]. Moscow: Yurlitinform; 2007. 256 p. Russian.
Gladysheva OV. Spravedlivostʼ i zakonnostʼ v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Justice and legality in criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation] [dissertation abstract]. Krasnodar: Kuban State University; 2009. 45 p. Russian.
Leist OE. Sushchnost’ prava. Problemy teorii i filosofii prava [Essence of law. Problems of theory and philosophy of law]. Moscow: Zertsalo; 2002. 288 p. Russian.
Bibilo VN. Belorusskoe sudoustroistvo [Belarusian court system]. Minsk: Pravo i ekonomika; 2018. 452 p. Russian.
Bibilo VN. Konstitutsionnye printsipy pravosudiya i ikh realizatsiya v stadii ispolneniya prigovora [Constitutional principles of justice and their implementation at the execution stage]. Minsk: Universitetskoe; 1986. 160 p. Russian.
Strogovich MS. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. Tom 1 [Course in Soviet criminal proceedings. Volume 1]. Moscow: Nauka; 1968. 468 p. Russian.
Miretskii SG. Prigovor suda [Court judgement]. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura; 1989. 112 p. Russian.
Dorokhov VYa, Nikolaev VS. Obosnovannost’ prigovora v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse [Validity of the sentence in the Soviet criminal proceedings]. Moscow: Gosyurizdat; 1959. 236 p. Russian.
Lupinskaya PA. Resheniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Ikh vidy, soderzhanie, formy [Decisions in criminal proceedings. Their types, content, forms]. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura; 1976. 168 p. Russian.
Belyaev MV. Svoistva sudebnykh reshenii v rossiiskom ugolovnom protsesse [Features of court judgements in the Russian criminal proceedings]. Moscow: Yurlitinform; 2018. 184 p. Russian.
Popova IP. Obvinitelʼnyi prigovor bez naznacheniya nakazaniya v rossiiskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: sushchnostʼ, osnovaniya i poryadok postanovleniya [Conviction without sentence in Russian criminal proceedings: essence, grounds and procedure of decision] [dissertation abstract]. Tomsk: [s. n.]; 2018. 23 p. Russian.
Ershov VV. Pravovoe i individual’noe regulirovanie obshchestvennykh otnoshenii [Legal and individual regulation of public relations]. Moscow: Russian State University of Justice; 2018. 628 p. Russian.