Justice of the court sentence

  • Valentina N. Bibilo Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

Abstract

Justice of the court sentence is provided by the interaction of the social regulators of justice on criminal cases and depends on two factors, one of which is legislation, and the other is discretion of judge. Justice of the criminal procedure creates conditions for the fair sentence. Justice of the sentence is based on establishment of the legal truth.

Author Biography

Valentina N. Bibilo, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

doctor of science (law), full professor; professor at the department of criminal procedure and directorate of public prosecutions, faculty of law

References

  1. Ekimov AI. [Law in the context of justice: toward a research methodology]. Pravovedenie. 2013;2:51–61. Russian.
  2. Hegel G. Filosofiya prava [Philosophy of law]. Moskow: Mysl’; 1990. 524 p. Russian.
  3. Aristotle. Etika. Politika. Ritorika. Poetika. Kategorii [Ethics. Politics. Rhetoric. Poetics. Categories]. Minsk: Literatura; 1998. 1391 p. Russian.
  4. Perelman H. [Three aspects of justice]. Pravovedenie. 2013;2:211–225. Russian.
  5. Heffe O. Spravedlivost’ [Justice]. Kildyushov OV, translator. Moscow: Praxis; 2007. 192 p. Russian.
  6. Rawls D. Teoriya spravedlivosti [Theory of justice]. Novosibirsk: Publishing House of Novosibirsk University; 1995. 536 p. Russian.
  7. Bibilo VN. [Discovering the truth in criminal procedure]. In: Pavlov VI, Savenok AL, editors. Chelovek i pravo: problema tsennostnykh osnovanii pravovogo regulirovaniya [Man and law: the problem of value bases of legal regulation]. Minsk: The Academy of the Interior Ministry; 2019. p. 255–260. Russian.
  8. Kelsen G. [Law, state and justice in the pure theory of law]. Pravovedenie. 2013;2:226–240. Russian.
  9. Berbeshkina ZA. Spravedlivost’ kak sotsial’no-filosofskaya kategoriya [Justice as a socio-philosophical category]. Moscow: Mysl’; 1983. 204 p. Russian.
  10. Pautov A. [Implementation of the principle of justice in judicial practice]. Sudovy vesnik. 2019;2:15–19. Russian.
  11. Danilyuk SE. [Justice as a constitutional and legal category]. Vesnik Kanstytucyjnaga Suda Rjespubliki Belarus’. 2019;1:47–64. Russian.
  12. Presnyakov MV. Konstitutsionnyi printsip spravedlivosti: yuridicheskaya priroda i normativnoe soderzhanie [Constitutional principle of justice: legal nature and normative content] [dissertation abstract]. Saratov: Saratov State University; 2010. 45 p. Russian.
  13. Shkredova EG, Mullahmetova NE, Magankova AA. Printsip spravedlivosti: teoriya i praktika primeneniya sudami pri rassmotrenii ugolovnykh del [The principle of justice: theory and practice of application by the courts in criminal cases]. Moscow: Yurlitinform; 2016. 168 p. Russian.
  14. Babaev VK, editor. Obshchaya teoriya prava [General theory of law]. Nizhny Novgorod: Higher School of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation; 1993. 544 p. Russian.
  15. Ashirova LM. Problemy realizatsii printsipa spravedlivosti v ugolovnom protsesse [Problems of implementing the principle of justice in criminal proceedings]. Moscow: Yurlitinform; 2007. 256 p. Russian.
  16. Gladysheva OV. Spravedlivostʼ i zakonnostʼ v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Justice and legality in criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation] [dissertation abstract]. Krasnodar: Kuban State University; 2009. 45 p. Russian.
  17. Leist OE. Sushchnost’ prava. Problemy teorii i filosofii prava [Essence of law. Problems of theory and philosophy of law]. Moscow: Zertsalo; 2002. 288 p. Russian.
  18. Bibilo VN. Belorusskoe sudoustroistvo [Belarusian court system]. Minsk: Pravo i ekonomika; 2018. 452 p. Russian.
  19. Bibilo VN. Konstitutsionnye printsipy pravosudiya i ikh realizatsiya v stadii ispolneniya prigovora [Constitutional principles of justice and their implementation at the execution stage]. Minsk: Universitetskoe; 1986. 160 p. Russian.
  20. Strogovich MS. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. Tom 1 [Course in Soviet criminal proceedings. Volume 1]. Moscow: Nauka; 1968. 468 p. Russian.
  21. Miretskii SG. Prigovor suda [Court judgement]. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura; 1989. 112 p. Russian.
  22. Dorokhov VYa, Nikolaev VS. Obosnovannost’ prigovora v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse [Validity of the sentence in the Soviet criminal proceedings]. Moscow: Gosyurizdat; 1959. 236 p. Russian.
  23. Lupinskaya PA. Resheniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Ikh vidy, soderzhanie, formy [Decisions in criminal proceedings. Their types, content, forms]. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura; 1976. 168 p. Russian.
  24. Belyaev MV. Svoistva sudebnykh reshenii v rossiiskom ugolovnom protsesse [Features of court judgements in the Russian criminal proceedings]. Moscow: Yurlitinform; 2018. 184 p. Russian.
  25. Popova IP. Obvinitelʼnyi prigovor bez naznacheniya nakazaniya v rossiiskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: sushchnostʼ, osnovaniya i poryadok postanovleniya [Conviction without sentence in Russian criminal proceedings: essence, grounds and procedure of decision] [dissertation abstract]. Tomsk: [s. n.]; 2018. 23 p. Russian.
  26. Ershov VV. Pravovoe i individual’noe regulirovanie obshchestvennykh otnoshenii [Legal and individual regulation of public relations]. Moscow: Russian State University of Justice; 2018. 628 p. Russian.
Published
2020-01-09
Keywords: law, court, court sentence, justice, principles of law, morality, state
How to Cite
Bibilo, V. N. (2020). Justice of the court sentence. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Law, 3, 73-79. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/law/article/view/1586
Issue
No 3 (2019): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Law
Section
Сriminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics