Генезіс і развіццё інтэрферэнцыі наддзяржаўнага ў нацыянальнае крымінальна-працэсуальнае права

  • Вадим Игоревич Самарин Белорусский государственный университет, пр. Независимости 4, 220030, г. Минск, Беларусь https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5315-4770

Аннотация

Представлено видение международно-правовой парадигмы современного уголовного процесса. По мнению автора, данная парадигма сложилась в результате интернационализации уголовного процесса и представляет собой опосредование в уголовно-процессуальном законодательстве принципов, закрепленных в международных правовых актах, и допущение прямого применения в уголовно-процессуальной деятельности международных договоров. Отмечается сложность выделения временных рамок этапов проникновения надгосударственного в национальный уголовный процесс, так как каждое государство проходило и проходит свой путь трансформации уголовного процесса. Автор выделяет пять этапов такой интерференции: 1) обеспечение беспрепятственной деятельности дипломатических агентов; 2) закрепление на национальном уровне института международной правовой помощи по уголовным делам; 3) имплементация общепризнанных норм о правах человека в сфере уголовного процесса; 4) признание на национальном уровне международной судебной защиты; 5) прямая гармонизация уголовно-процессуального права в рамках наднациональной организации.

Биография автора

Вадим Игоревич Самарин, Белорусский государственный университет, пр. Независимости 4, 220030, г. Минск, Беларусь

кандидат юридических наук, доцент; доцент кафедры уголовного процесса и прокурорского надзора юридического факультета

Литература

  1. Biryukov PN. Mezhdunarodnoye sotrudnichestvo v bor’be s prestupnost’yu i pravovaya sistema RF [International cooperation in the fight against crime and the legal system of the Russian Federation]. Voronezh: Istoki; 1997. 176 p. Russian.
  2. Boitsov AI. Vydacha prestupnikov [Extradition of criminals]. Saint Petersburg: Yuridicheskii tsentr Press; 2004. 795 p. Russian.
  3. Volzhenkina VM. Vydacha v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse [Extradition in the Russian criminal procedure]. Moscow: Yurlitinform; 2002. 336 p. Russian.
  4. Litvin AA. Nekotoryye voprosy vydachi obvinyayemykh i osuzhdennykh lits v ramkakh okazaniya pravovoy pomoshchi po ugolovnym delam [Some issues of extradition of accused and convicted persons as part of the provision of legal assistance in criminal matters]. Kazan’: Kazan State University; 2004. 40 p. Russian.
  5. Minkova YuV. Printsipy instituta vydachi (ekstraditsii) v mezhdunarodnom prave [The principles of the institution of extradition in international law]. Moscow: RUDN University; 2002. 86 p. Russian.
  6. Tolochko ON. [Extradition in international law and in the legislation of the Republic of Belarus]. Yustitsiya Belarusi. 2019;10:24–28. Russian.
  7. Biryukov PN. Mezhdunarodnoye pravo. Tom 2 [International law. Volume 2]. Moscow: Yurait; 2018. 309 p. Russian.
  8. Andreychik NI, editor. Nauchno-prakticheskii kommentarii k Ugolovno-protsessual’nomu kodeksu Respubliki Belarus’ [Scientific and practical commentary on the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Belarus]. Minsk: The Academy of the Interior Ministry; 2014. 1231 p. Russian.
  9. Smirnov AV, Kalinovskii KB. Ugolovnyy protsess [Criminal process]. Moscow: KNORUS; 2008. 704 p. Russian.
  10. Vashkevich AE. [Constitutional and legal institution of appeal to international bodies to protect the rights and freedoms of the individual]. In: Babkina EV, Vaskevich AE, editors. Aktual’nyye problemy mezhdunarodnogo publichnogo i mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava. Vypusk 3 [Current issues of international public and international private law. Issue 3]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2011. p. 5–15. Russian.
  11. Vasilevich GA. Konstitutsiya Respubliki Belarus’: nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy [Constitution of the Republic of Belarus: scientific and practical commentary]. Minsk: State Institute of Management of Social Technologies BSU; 2005. 487 p. Russian.
  12. Plyakhimovich II. Kommentarii k Konstitutsii Respubliki Belarus’. Tom 1 [Commentary on the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus. Volume 1]. Minsk: Amalfey; 2015.1224 p. Russian.
  13. Chirkin VE. [Supranational law: main features]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2017;2:131–137. DOI: 10.12737/24124. Russian.
  14. Kashkin SYu, editor. Integratsionnoye pravo [Integration law]. Moscow: Prospect; 2017. 720 p. Russian.
  15. Lando DD, Samarin VI. Yevropeyskoye publichnoye pravo [European public law]. Moscow: Prospekt; 2015. 208 p. Russian.
  16. Bekyashev KA. [EAEU: an international (interstate) organization or an international (interstate) integration association? Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2014;11(78):14–16. Russian.
  17. Stoiko NG. Ugolovnyy protsess zapadnykh gosudarstv i Rossii: sravnitel’noe teoretiko-pravovoe issledovanie anglo-amerikanskoi i romano-germanskoi pravovykh sistem [The criminal process of Western states and Russia: a comparative theoretical and legal study of the Anglo-American and Romano-German legal systems]. Saint Petersburg: Publishing House of Saint Petersburg State University; 2006. 264 p. Russian.
  18. Timokhov YuA. Inostrannoe pravo v sudebnoi praktike [Foreign law in judicial practice]. Moscow: Walters Cloover; 2004. 176 p. Russian.
  19. Bekyashev KA, editor. Mezhdunarodnoye publichnoye pravo [International public law]. Moscow: Prospekt; 2008. 780 p. Russian.
  20. Löwe E, Herausgeber. Die Strafprozeßordnung und das Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz: Großkommentar. Band 1: Einleitung; §§ 1 bis 111n. Berlin: de Gruyter; 1976. 196 S.
  21. Rieß P, Herausgeber. Löwe-Rosenberg. Die Strafprozeßordnung und das Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz: Großkommentar. Band 1: Einleitung; §§ 1 bis 111n. Berlin: de Gruyter; 1988. 1555 S.
  22. Rieß P, Herausgeber. Löwe-Rosenberg. Die Strafprozeßordnung und das Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz: Großkommentar. Band 1: Einleitung; §§ 1 bis 71. Berlin: de Gruyter; 1999. 1062 S.
  23. Becker JP, Herausgeber. Löwe-Rosenberg. Die Strafprozeßordnung und das Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz: Großkommentar. Band 1: Einleitung; §§ 1–47. Berlin: de Gruyter; 2016. 1151 S.
  24. Lukashuk II. Mezhdunarodnoye pravo. Osobennaya chast’ [International law. The Special part]. Moscow: Walters Cloover; 2005. 554 p. Russian.
  25. Rochester JM. Fundamental principles of international relations. Boulder: Westview Press; 2010. 432 p.
  26. Golovko LV, editor. Kurs ugolovnogo protsessa [The course of the criminal process]. Moscow: Statute; 2017. 1280 p. Russian.
  27. Lazarev VA. Dokazyvaniye v ugolovnom protsesse [Proving in criminal proceedings]. Moscow: Yurayt; 2015. 359 p. Russian.
  28. Borulenkov YuP. Theory of evidence and evidencing: need to differentiate procedural cognition and evidencing]. Rossiyskii sledovatel’. 2017;6:3–8. Russian.
  29. Karnozova LM. Vvedeniye v vosstanovitel’noye pravosudie (mediatsiya v otvet na prestuplenie) [Introduction to restorative justice (mediation in response to crime)]. Moscow: Prospekt; 2014. 262 p. Russian.
  30. Safferling C. Die Rolle des Opfers im Strafverfahren - Paradigmenwechsel im nationalen und internationalen Recht? Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft. 2010;122(1):87–116.
  31. Tsvetkov YuA. Procedural independence of the investigator in contemporary paradigm of pre-judicial proceedings]. Rossiyskiy sledovatel’. 2014;14:52–56. Russian.
  32. Wortley BA. The interaction of public and private international law today. Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law. 1954;85:239–338.
  33. Pushmin EA. [The system of Soviet law and the prospects for its development. Round table of the journal «Soviet State and Law»]. Sovetskoye gosudarstvo i pravo. 1982;8:105–106. Russian.
  34. Sіl’chanka MU. Tjeoryja krynic belaruskaga prava [A theory of sources of Belarusian law]. Hrodna: Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno; 2012. 253 p. Belarusian.
  35. Danilevich AA, Petrova OV, Samaryn VI. Ugolovnyy protsess [Criminal procedure]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2016. 351 p. Russian.
  36. Lukashuk II. [The Constitution of Russia and international law]. Moscow Journal of International Law. 1995;2:29–41. Russian.
  37. Kant I. [Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason]. In: Kant I. Sobranie sochinenii v vos'mi tomakh. Tom 6 [Collected works in eight volumes. Volume 6]. Moscow: CHORO; 1994. p. 5–222. Russian.
  38. Golovko LV. [Criminal proceedings in the face of the latest ideological challenges]. In: Azemsha SYa, editor. Formirovanie effektivnoi ugolovnoi politiki i optimal’noi modeli dosudebnogo proizvodstva – prioritetnaya zadacha yuridicheskoi nauki i praktiki. Sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii; 25–26 aprelya 2019 g.; Minsk, Belarus’ [Formation of an effective criminal policy and an optimal model of pre-trial proceedings is a priority task of legal science and practice. Materials of the International scientific-practical conference; 2019 April 25–26; Minsk, Belarus]. Minsk: YurSpektr; 2019. p. 201–205. Russian.
  39. Langer M. La portée des categories accusatoire et inquisitoire. Revue de Sciences Criminelle et de Droit Penal Compare. 2014;4:707–728.
  40. Danilevich AA, Samaryn VI. Mezhdunarodnaya pravovaya pomoshch’ po ugolovnym delam: ugolovno-protsessual’nyi aspekt [International legal assistance in criminal matters: the criminal procedural aspect]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2009. 127 p. Russian.
  41. Kant I. Pervoye vvedeniye v kritiku sposobnosti suzhdeniya. Kritika sposobnosti suzhdeniya. primenenii teleologicheskikhprintsipov v filosofii. Ideya vseobshchei istorii vo vsemirno-grazhdanskom plane. K vechnomu miru. Predpolagayemoe nachalo chelovecheskoi istorii [First introduction to the critique of judgment. Critique of judgment. On the application of teleological principles in philosophy. The idea of world history in a worldwide civilian way. Perpetual peace. The alleged beginning of human history]. Saint Petersburg: Science; 2001. 512 p. Russian.
  42. Lukashuk II, Naumov AB. Mezhdunarodnoye ugolovnoye pravo [International criminal law]. Moscow: Spark; 1999. 287 p. Russian.
  43. Turaev BA. Istoriya Drevnego Vostoka [History of the Ancient East]. Minsk: Harvest; 2002. 752 p. Russian.
  44. Foinitsky II. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Tom 2 [The course of criminal proceedings. Volume 2]. Saint Petersburg: Al’fa; 1996. 605 p. Russian.
  45. Grützner H, Pötz P-G. Auslieferungsgesetz (Belgien), 1. Oktober 1833. In: Grützner H, Pötz P-G, Kreß C, Gazeas N, Herausgeber. Internationaler Rechtshilfeverkehr in Strafsachen. Heidelberg: R. V. Decker; 1986. S. 1–2.
  46. Rodionov KS. [The law of the Russian Empire of 1911 on extradition]. Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2003;7:80–91. Russian.
  47. Grajewski J, Paprzycki LK, Płachta M. Kodeks postępowania karnego. Tom 2. Komentarz do art. 425–673 KPK. Kraków: Zakamycze; 2003. 814 s.
  48. Marchenko MN, Deryabina EM. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava [The theory of state and law]. Moscow: Prospekt; 2017. 720 p. Russian.
  49. Strogovich MS. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. Tom 1. Osnovnye polozheniya nauki sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa [The course of the Soviet criminal process. Volume 1. The main provisions of the Soviet criminal procedure science]. Moscow: Science; 1968. 470 p. Russian.
  50. Bekeshko SP, Matvienko EA, editors. Ugolovnyi protsess BSSR [The criminal process of the BSSR]. Minsk: Vyshjejshaja shkola; 1979. 542 p. Russian.
  51. Sidorenko MV. [The principle of the presumption of innocence in the Soviet criminal process (1960–1980s) and the political reasons for its incomplete legislative consolidation]. Vestnik Krasnodarskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2009;1:38–39. Russian.
Опубликован
2020-10-27
Ключевые слова: крымінальны працэс, крымінальна-працэсуальны закон, гарманізацыя заканадаўства, прававыя сістэмы, міжнародна-прававая парадыгма
Как цитировать
Самарин, В. И. (2020). Генезіс і развіццё інтэрферэнцыі наддзяржаўнага ў нацыянальнае крымінальна-працэсуальнае права. Журнал Белорусского государственного университета. Право, 2, 66-77. Доступно по https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/law/article/view/2842
Выпуск
№ 2 (2020): Журнал Белорусского государственного университета. Право
Раздел
Уголовное право, уголовный процесс и криминалистика