Worldview measures of assessment of evidence in a constitutional litigation

  • Nataliya K. Shaptala Constitutional Court of Ukraine, 14 Zhilyanskaya Street, Kyiv 01033, Ukraine

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the philosophical and legal content of worldview dimensions of the assessment of evidence in the constitutional court process, and the understanding of their role in relation to the adoption of a fair and well-founded judicial decision. The author pays special attention to issues related to the definition of general principles of philosophical and functional specificity of evidence in the work of the body of constitutional jurisdiction and their influence on the paradigm of regulation of social relations in the main spheres of social activity of society.

Author Biography

Nataliya K. Shaptala, Constitutional Court of Ukraine, 14 Zhilyanskaya Street, Kyiv 01033, Ukraine

PhD (law); judge of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine

References

  1. Sladic J, Uzelac А. Assessment of Evidence. In: Rijavec V, Kerestš T, Ivanc T, editors. Dimensions of Evidence in European Civil Procedure. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International BV; 2016. р. 107–131.
  2. Karban’ AA. [Legal awareness and its role in shaping judges’ convictions]. In: Aktual’ni problemy borot’by zi zlochynnistiu na etapi reformuvannia kryminalnoho sudochynstva: materialy Vseukrai’nskoi’ naukovo-praktychnoi’ konferencii’. Kyiv: [publisher unknown]; 2006;2:129–130. Ukrainian.
  3. Drozdovych NL. [Legislative consolidation of the principle of free assessment of evidence in the countries of the Romano Germanic legal system]. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law. 2010;2:137–140. Ukrainian.
  4. Orlov YuK. Osnovy teorii dokazatel’stv v ugolovnom protsesse: nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie [Fundamentals of the theory of evidence in the criminal process: a scientific and practical guide]. Moscow: Prospekt; 2000. 144 p. Russian.
  5. Stakhivs’kyj SM. Kryminal’no-procesual’ni zasoby dokazuvannja [Criminal Proceedings Evidence] [dissertation]. Kyiv; 2005. Ukrainian.
  6. Kostyсkyj MV. [Evidence in the jurisdictional process: philosophical and psychological problems]. Problemy procesual’noi nauky: istorija ta suchasnist’: materialy drugoi mizhnarodnoi’ naukovo-praktychnoi’ konferencii; g. Kyiv, Ukrain, 25–26 lystopada 2010 r. Kyiv: [publisher unknown]; 2010. p. 43–45. Ukrainian.
  7. Burns K. Judges, «commonsense» and judicial cognition. Journal Griffith Law Review. 2016;25(3):319–351.
  8. Goff JL. Mentalities: a history of ambiguities. In: Goff JL, Nora P, editors. Constructing the past: essays in historical methodology. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1985. Co-published by the «Paris: Editions de la maison des sciences de l’lemme» (Paris).
  9. Il’ichyov LF, Fedoseev PN, Kovalyov SM, Panov VG, editors. Filosofskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ [Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya; 1983. 840 p. Russian.
  10. Sire JW. Naming the Elephant: World viewas a Concept. London: Inter Varsity Press; 2015. 201 p.
  11. Gyrovych V. [The judge’s inner convictions are the basic element of the directness of the study of testimony, speeches, and documents]. National law journal: theory and practice. 2015;5(2):89–94. Ukrainian.
  12. Levitsky S, Way L. Assessingt he Quality of Democracy. Journal of Democracy. 2015;26(1):45–58.
  13. Monteleone G. Manuale di diritto processuale civile. Volume 1. Milan: CEDAM; 2009. 494 р. Italian.
  14. Stobbs N. Indefense of Therapeutic jurisprudence: thre at, promise and world view. Arizona Summit Law Review. 2016;8(3):325–352.
  15. Palmer G. Toward a theory of cultural lingunstics. Austin: University of Texas Press; 1996. 360 р.
  16. Pepeljajev SG. Jevropejs’kyj pravovyj gumanizm jak chynnyk reformuvannja kryminal’no-procesual’nogo prava Ukrai’ny [European legal humanism as a factor in reforming the criminal procedural law of Ukraine]. Кyiv: Nacional’na akademija vnutrishnih sprav Ukrai’ny; 2005. Ukrainian.
  17. Myronenko OO. [A separate opinion on the decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine of December 14, 1999 No. 10-rp / 1999 in the case on the application of the Ukrainian language]. Ofitsiinyj visnyk Ukrai’ny. 2000;4:109. Ukrainian.
  18. Apostel L. Woodspring: Inleading to teen metaphysic avenged on stain vanes, livened heelball (begored & vane antivenin end Voorhies door Wim Christiane’s). Brussel: VUB press; 2000. 230 p.
Published
2019-01-19
How to Cite
Shaptala, N. K. (2019). Worldview measures of assessment of evidence in a constitutional litigation. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Law, 3, 70-75. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/law/article/view/1532
Issue
No 3 (2018): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Law
Section
Constitutional Law and Administrative Law