Cancellation of a ruling on a court order at the request of a person whose rights (interests) are affected by this court decision
Abstract
The question of whether it is expedient to provide persons other than the debtor, whose rights and (or) legitimate interests are affected by the ruling on a court order, the opportunity to demand the cancellation of this ruling in the court that issued it, is being investigated. It is shown that such an opportunity does not provide the necessary protection of the rights and (or) legitimate interests of another person, is capable of provoking abuse on the part of the latter, significantly violates the interests of the claimant and the debtor, and has other disadvantages. On this basis, it was concluded that other persons should not have this opportunity, they can defend their rights and (or) legitimate interests by using the tools of the claim form of protection of rights, and in exceptional cases – by initiating the cancellation of a ruling on a court order in the course of supervisory proceedings.
References
- Branovitskiy KL, Skobelev VP. Writ proceedings in post-Soviet countries: lost opportunity. Zakon. 2019;1:125–137. Russian.
- Kolesnikova L. [On the issue of fixing writ proceedings in the draft law on civil proceedings]. Sudovy vesnik. 2021;1:3–9. Russian.
- Krymskii DI. Uproshchenie grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva: rossiiskii i zarubezhnyi opyt [Simplification of civil proceedings: Russian and foreign experience]. Kudryavtseva EV, Morshchakova TG, editors. Moscow: Yurisprudentsiya; 2008. 120 p. Russian.
- Mikhaseva A. [Writ proceedings in cases of recovery of expenses spent by the state on the maintenance of children]. Zakonnost’ i pravoporyadok. 2013;4:46–51. Russian.
- Papulova ZA. Uskorennye formy rassmotreniya del v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [Accelerated forms of consideration of cases in civil proceedings]. Moscow: Infotropic Media; 2014. 184 p. Russian.
- Reshetnyak VI, Chernykh II. Zaochnoe proizvodstvo i sudebnyi prikaz v grazhdanskom protsesse [Absentee proceedings and court orders in civil procedure]. Moscow: Gorodets; 1997. 86 p. Russian.
- Skobelev VP. [On the question of the admissibility of reviewing the ruling on a court order in a civil case in the appellate procedure]. In: Karpovich NA, editor. Pravo v sovremennom belorusskom obshchestve. Vypusk 16 [Law in modern Belarusian society. Issue 16]. Minsk: Kolorgrad; 2021. p. 460–473. Russian.
- Taranova TS. [Evidence in writ proceedings]. In: Martynenko IE, editor. Problemy grazhdanskogo prava i protsessa [Problems of civil law and procedure]. Grodna: Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno; 2013. p. 359–364. Russian.
- Tikhinya VG. [Writ proceedings in civil procedure]. Pravo Belarusi. 2003;23:73–76. Russian.
- Cheremin MA. Prikaznoe proizvodstvo v rossiiskom grazhdanskom protsesse [Mandatory proceedings in the Russian civil procedure]. Moscow: Gorodets; 2001. 172 p. Russian.
- Skobelev VP. Zakonnaya sila postanovlenii suda pervoi instantsii v grazhdanskom protsesse [The legal force of the decisions of the court of first instance in civil procedure]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2018. 447 p. Russian.
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
