The effect of some principles of civil proceedings during appealing the actions of compulsory enforcement bodies officials

  • Yuriy Kh. Rapyan Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

Abstract

The author of the article examines the features of the operation of some functional principles of civil proceedings in cases of complaints against decisions, actions (inaction) of compulsory enforcement bodies officials, taking into account the public legal nature of this category of cases. The possibility of the parties to a dispute exercising their regulatory rights in the light of the principle of dispositivity is analysed. The desirability of personal participation of officials of compulsory enforcement bodies in court hearings in the studied category of cases is substantiated in order to implement the adversarial principles of the process and ensure the implementation of the principle of immediacy of the trial.

Author Biography

Yuriy Kh. Rapyan, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

postgraduate student at the department of civil process and labour law, faculty of law

References

  1. Yurkevich NG. Izbrannye trudy [Selected works]. Minsk: Editorial Office of Journal «Promyshlenno-torgovoe pravo»; 2015. [The essence of civil procedure]; p. 448–508. Russian.
  2. Treushnikov MK. Tvorcheskie poiski v nauke grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava [Creative searches in the science of civil procedural law]. Moscow: Gorodets; 2020. [The evolution of Russian civil proceedings at the beginning of the 21st century]; p. 204–213. Russian.
  3. Belova TA, Koliadko IN, editors. Grazhdanskii protsess. Obshchaya chast’ [The civil procedure. General part]. Minsk: Publishing House of the Belarusian State University; 2020. 379 p. Russian.
  4. Treushnikov MK, editor. Grazhdanskii protsess [The сivil procedure]. Moscow: Gorodets; 2018. 832 p. Russian.
  5. Vikut MA. Izbrannye nauchnye trudy (s 1950 po 2011 god) [Selected scientific works (from 1950 to 2011)]. Moscow: Statut; 2023. [Once again about the legal nature of enforcement proceedings]; p. 324–332. Russian.
  6. Koliadko IN. [Administrative claim as a means of unifying justice in civil and economic cases]. In: Danilevich AA, editor. Razvitie sudebnoi vlasti v Respublike Belarus’. Materialy Mezhdunarodnogo kruglogo stola; 20 aprelya 2017 g.; Minsk, Belarus’ [Development of the judiciary in the Republic of Belarus. Proceedings of the International round table; 2017 April 20; Minsk, Belarus]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2017. p. 45–50. Russian.
  7. Sinyuk EV. [On improving the handling and settlement of civil cases arising from public law relations by the courts]. Pravo.by. 2019;5:38–43. Russian.
  8. Skobelev V. [On the role and significance of the principles of civil procedure in the context of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Republic of Belarus (beginning)]. Sudovy vesnik. 2024;1:72–79. Russian.
  9. Koliadko IN. [Code of Civil Proceedings as a result and stage of judicial reform]. In: Romanova ON, Koliadko IN, editors. Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya tsivilisticheskogo protsessyal’nogo prava. Sbornik statei po materialam Mezhdunarodnogo nauchno-prakticheskogo kruglogo stola, priurochennogo k 70-letiyu professora kafedry grazhdanskogo protsessa i trudovogo prava yuridicheskogo fakul’teta Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta I. N. Koliadko; 15 aprelya 2022 g.; Minsk, Belarus’ [Modern trends in the development of civil procedural law. Collection of articles based on the materials of the International scientific and practical round table dedicated to the 70th anniversary of professor of the department of civil procedure and labour law, faculty of law, Belarusian State University I. N. Koliadko; 2022 April 15; Minsk, Belarus]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2022. p. 49–57. Russian.
  10. Aleshchenko A. [Proceedings in the court of first instance: some provisions of the draft Code of Civil Proceedings]. Sudovy vesnik. 2022;4:3–8. Russian.
  11. Rapyan YuKh. [Judicial appeal (challenging) of the actions of enforcement bodies’ officials within civil procedural law and legislation]. Yustitsiya Belarusi. 2023;7:34–39. Russian.
  12. Isaenkova OV. Ispolnitel’noe pravo v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: osobennosti stanovleniya i perspektivy razvitiya [Executive law in the Russian Federation: features of formation and development prospects]. Demichev AA, editor. Moscow: Yurlitinform; 2007. 296 p. Russian.
  13. Reshetnikova IS, Yarkov VV. Grazhdanskoe pravo i grazhdanskii protsess v sovremennoi Rossii [Civil law and civil procedure in modern Russia]. Ekaterinburg: Norma; 1999. 312 p. Russian.
  14. Voronov AF. Grazhdanskii protsess: evolyutsiya dispozitivnosti [Civil procedure: evolution of dispositivity]. Moscow: Statut; 2007. 149 p. Russian.
  15. Skobelev VP. The objective limits of validity of court decisions on negative claims for recognition. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Law. 2018;3:87–100. Russian.
  16. Kvosta P. [Access to (administrative) court. On the issue of the prerequisites for appeal in administrative proceedings in Austria]. Ezhegodnik publichnogo prava. 2019:200–215. Russian.
  17. Kallistratova RF, Argunov AV. [On unity of civil proceedings]. Rossiiskoe pravosudie. 2016;5:24–30. Russian.
  18. Treushnikov MK, Maleshin DYa. [New Civil Procedure Code of Russia of 2002: some sociocultural features]. In: Treushnikov MK, editor. Grazhdanskii protsess: teoriya i praktika [Civil procedure: theory and practice]. Moscow: Gorodets; 2008. p. 232–238. Russian.
  19. Rapyan YuKh. [On limitation terms for appealing to the court against the actions of officials of enforcement bodies]. Pravo.by. 2022;6:79–85. Russian.
  20. Rapyan YuKh. [Effect of principle of adversarial proceedings and principle of establishment of truth in public law cases in the Republic of Belarus]. Zakonodatel’stvo. 2024;1:63–68. Russian.
  21. Gurvich MA. Izbrannye trudy. Tom 2 [Selected works. Volume 2]. Krasnodar: Sovetskaya Kuban’; 2006. [Preventive terms in Soviet civil law]; p. 233–328. Russian.
  22. Treushnikov MK. [Introduction]. In: Ryazanovskii VA. Edinstvo protsessa [The unity of procedure]. Moscow: Gorodets; 2024. p. 3–11. Russian.
  23. Gurvich MA, editor. Sovetskii grazhdanskii protsess [Soviet civil procedure]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola; 1967. 436 p. Russian.
  24. Sinyuk EV. [Specifics of the burden of proof in public law cases in civil proceedings]. In: Martynenko IE, editor. Problemy grazhdanskogo prava i protsessa. Vypusk 6 [Problems of civil law and process. Issue 6]. Grodna: Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno; 2021. p. 323–330. Russian.
  25. Belova TA. [Consideration of complaints about notarial acts or refusal to perform them in civil proceedings]. Sudovy vesnik. 2018;3:66–71. Russian.
  26. Treushnikov MK. Sudebnye dokazatel’stva [Judicial evidences]. Moscow: Gorodets; 2021. 304 p. Russian.
Published
2024-09-05
Keywords: principles of civil proceeding, complaint, bailiff, dispositivity, competitiveness, immediacy
How to Cite
Rapyan, Y. K. (2024). The effect of some principles of civil proceedings during appealing the actions of compulsory enforcement bodies officials. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Law, 2, 36-43. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/law/article/view/6532
Issue
No 2 (2024): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Law
Section
Civil Law and Civil Procedure