Refugee status as a bar to extradition? A comparative perspective on Russian and Belarusian law
Abstract
Neither Russia nor Belarus have been significantly touched by the current wave of refugee flows stemming from the Near and Middle East as well as from Northern Africa. Recently though, their systems of refugee protection have been used by fugitives from other Eurasian Economic Union countries, primarily from Kazakhstan, to claim refugee status in order to escape extradition requests from their home countries. This article looks into the question how easily refugee status can be obtained in Russia and Belarus and what protections it offers in a comparative perspective. It argues that for Russia (which is the preferred destination), refugee status does not provide a per se bar to extradition, but that a human rights-based non refoulement needs to be observed. Belarusian law, by comparison, is much more amenable. In order to prevent the emergence of safe havens within the Eurasian Economic Union, criminal justice cooperation needs to be modernized.
References
- Majoros F. Die Rechtshilfeabkommen der osteuropäischen RGW-Staaten. Teil II. Die Abkommen in Strafsachen. Cologne. Bericht des BIOst. 1983;34.
- Grahl-Madsen A. The Status of Refugees in International Law. Volume 1. Refugee Character. Leyden: A. W. Sijthoff; 1966. 499 p.
- Goodwin-Gill GS. The Refugee in International Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1996. 848 p.
- Krüßmann T. Transnationales Strafprozessrecht. Baden-Baden: Nomos; 2009. 775 S.
- Smrkolj M. International Institutions and Individualized Decision-Making: an Example of UNHCR’s Refugee Status Determination. German Law Journal. 2008;9:11(9):1779–1804.
- Cantor DJ. Reframing Relationships: Revisiting the Procedural Standards for Refugee Status Determination in Light of Recent Human Rights Treaty Body Jurisprudence. Refugee Survey Quarterly. 2015;34(1):79–106. DOI: 10.1093/rsq/hdu017.
- Storey H. Consistency in Refugee Decision-making: a Judicial Perspective. Refugee Survey Quarterly. 2013;32(4):112–125. DOI: 10.1093/rsq/hdto18.
- Jaeger G. On the History of the International Protection of Refugees. International Review of the Red Cross. 2001;83(843):727–738.
- Zimmermann A, editor. The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol: a Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. 1936 p.
- Weis P. The Refugee Convention, 1951. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995. 272 p.
- Burgstaller M, Manfred NM. Aut dedere aut iudicare. Fragen der internationalen Zusammenarbeit in Auslieferungsverfahren. Vienna: Neuer Wissenschaftlicher Verlag; 2010. 102 p.
- Clark T, Crépeau F. Mainstreaming Refugee Rights. The 1951 Refugee Convention and International Human Rights Law. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights. 1999;17(4):389–410.
