О развитии вычислительного мышления и Agile-практиках в образовательном процессе учреждений высшего образования

  • Дмитрий Васильевич Филимонов Белорусский государственный университет, пр. Независимости, 4, 220030, г. Минск, Беларусь

Аннотация

На основе обзора ряда современных методик развития вычислительного мышления описываются особенности интеграции методологии фреймворков Agile в образовательный процесс ряда дисциплин естественно-научного цикла учреждений высшего образования.

Биография автора

Дмитрий Васильевич Филимонов, Белорусский государственный университет, пр. Независимости, 4, 220030, г. Минск, Беларусь

ассистент кафедры веб-технологий и компьютерного моделирования механико-математического факультета

Литература

  1. Wing J. Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM. 2006;49(3):33–35. DOI: 10.1145/1118178.1118215.
  2. Brovka NV, Ablameiko SV. [Applied aspects of computer vision in the preparation of undergraduates at a classical university]. In: Noskov MV, editor. Informatizatsiya obrazovaniya i metodika elektronnogo obucheniya: tsifrovye tekhnologii v obrazovanii. Materialy V Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii; 21–24 sentyabrya 2021 g.; Krasnoyarsk, Rossiya [Informatisation of education and e-learning methodology: digital technologies in education. Materials of the 5th International Scientific Conference; 2021 September 21–24; Krasnoyarsk, Russia]. Krasnoyarsk: Siberian Federal University; 2021. p. 78–82. Russian.
  3. Ablameyko MS, Brovka NV. Should students of all majors study artificial intelligence? Annals of Social Sciences and Management Studies. 2022;7(3):555711. DOI: 10.19080/ASM.2022.07.555711
  4. Wolfram S. How to teach computational thinking [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2022 July 23]. Available from: https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2016/09/how-to-teach-computational-thinking.
  5. Denning PJ, Tedre M. Computational thinking: a disciplinary perspective. Informatics in Education. 2021;20(3):361–390. DOI: 10.15388/infedu.2021.21.
  6. Swanson H, Irgens GA, Bain C, Hall K, Woods P, Rogge C, et al. Characterizing computational thinking in high school science. International Society of the Learning Sciences. 2018;3:871–878. DOI: 10.22318/cscl2018.871.
  7. Aiken JM, Caballero MD, Douglas SS, Burk BJ, Scanlon E, Thoms BD, et al. Understanding student computational thinking with computational modeling. In: Engelhardt PV, Churukian A, Rebello NS, editors. Physics education research conference. AIP conference proceedings; 2012 August 1–2; Philadelphia, USA [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2022 September 1]. Available from: https://aip.scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1063/1.4789648.
  8. Cruz Castro LM, Magana A, Douglas K, Boutin M. Analyzing students’ computational thinking practices in a first-year engineering course. IEEE Access. 2021;9:33041–33050. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3061277.
  9. Nardelli E. Do we really need computational thinking? Communications of the ACM. 2019;62(2):32-35. DOI: 10.1145/3231587.
  10. Stewart JC, DeCusatis CS, Kidder K, Massi JR, Kirk MA. Evaluating agile principles in active and cooperative learning [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2022 August 1]. Available from: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.510.3904&rep=rep1&type=pdf. DOI: 10.1.1.510.3904.
  11. Fronza I, El IN, Corral L. Teaching computational thinking using agile software engineering methods: a framework for middle schools. ACM Transactions on Computing Education. 2017;17(4):1–28. DOI: 10.1145/3055258.
  12. Moreira CО. The development of computational thinking in computing higher education. In: Association for Computing ACM Technical Machinery. GIGCSE 2022: the 53rd ACM technical symposium on computer science education; 2022 March 2–5; Providence, USA. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2022. p. 1172. DOI: 10.1145/3478432.3499217.
  13. Dewi DA, Muniandy M. The agility of agile methodology for teaching and learning activities. In: Dayang Norhayati Abang Jawawi, Shahida Sulaiman, Nor Azizah Sa’adon, Radziah Mohamad, editors. 2014 8th Malaysian software engineering conference; 2014 September 23–24; Langkawi, Malaysia. Malaysia: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2014. p. 255–259. DOI: 10.1109/MySec.2014.6986024.
  14. Duvall S, Hutchings D, Kleckner M. Changing perceptions of discrete mathematics through scrum-based course management practices. Journal of Computing Sciences in College. 2017;33(2):182–189. DOI: 10.5555/3144645.3144672.
  15. Noguera I, Guerrero A-E, Maso R. Collaborative agile learning in online environments: Strategies for improving team regulation and project management. Computers & Education. 2017;116:110-129. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.008.
  16. Bacea I, Ciupe A, Meza S. Interactive Kanban – blending digital and physical resources for collaborative project based learning. In: Chang Maiga, Chen Nian-Shing, Huang Ronghuai, Kinshuk, Sampson Demetrios G, Vasiu Radu, editors. IEEE 17th International conference on advanced learning technologies; 2017 July 3–7; Timisoara, Romania. Timisoara: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2017. p. 210–211. DOI: 10.1109/ICALT.2017.68.
  17. Delhij A, Solingen R, Wijnands W. The eduScrum guide [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2022 September 1]. Available from: http://agileineducation.ru/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/The_eduScrum_Guide_EN_1.2.pdf.
  18. Gestwicki P, McNely B. Interdisciplinary projects in the academic studio. ACM Transactions on Computing Education. 2016;16(2);1–24. DOI: 10.1145/2732157.
Опубликован
2022-12-01
Ключевые слова: вычислительное мышление, подготовка студентов, естественно-математические специальности, фреймворк, методология Agile-практик
Выпуск
№ 2 (2022): Университетский педагогический журнал
Раздел
Методика и современные образовательные технологии