Clustering of social representations of tourists from different countries by the hospitality industry employees

Authors

  • Darya V. Klimovich Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

Keywords:

social representations, semantic differential, hotel business, hospitality industry, foreign tourists

Abstract

Social representations of tourists from different countries visiting the Republic of Belarus were studied from the point of view of hospitality industry employees. The method of semantic differential by 21 personal characteristics was applied. As a result of cluster analysis, 6 clusters were identified. The first cluster included representatives from Russia, Ukraine and Italy. The second cluster was formed exclusively by representatives of Belarus. The third cluster was formed by representatives from China, Israel and Turkey. The fourth cluster included representatives from the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Switzerland and Germany. The fifth cluster was formed by representatives of the United States, France and Poland, and the sixth cluster included representatives of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. Were identified and described differences between clusters.

Author Biography

  • Darya V. Klimovich, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    postgraduate student at the department of psychology, faculty of philosophy and social sciences

References

  1. Yanchuk VA. Vvedenie v sovremennuyu sotsial’nuyu psikhologiyu [Introduction to modern social psychology]. Minsk: ASAR; 2005. 768 p. Russian.
  2. Andreeva GM. Psikhologiya sotsial’nogo poznaniya [Psychology of social cognition]. Moscow: Aspect-press; 2004. 288 p. Russian.
  3. Jodelet D. Représentations Sociales: phénoménes, concept et théorie. In: Moscovici S, editor. Psychologie sociale. Paris: PUF; 1984. p. 357–379.
  4. Yemelyanova TP. Sotsial’nye predstavleniya: istoriya, teoriya i empiricheskie issledovaniya [Social representations: history, theory, and empirical research]. Moscow: Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences; 2016. 476 p. Russian.
  5. Al-Said K, Makrakis V, Calogiannakis P, Kostaulas-Makrakis N, De Baz T. Social representations between Greeks and Jordanians: a comparative study. Europe’s Journal of Psychology [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2019 February 1];3(1). Available from: https://ejop.psychopen.eu/article/view/388/html. DOI: 10.5964/ejop.v3i1.388.
  6. Tyrlik M, Kourilova S, Konečny S. How trust based on personal experience builds social representations of Austrian neighbors among Czech adolescents living near the Czech – Austrian border. In: 8th International conference on social representations: media and society; 2006 August 28 – September 1; Rome, Italy [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2018 September 12]. Available from: www.europhd.it/sites/default/files/images/onda_3/05/8thICSR/presentation.html.
  7. Realo A, Allik J, Lönnqvist J-E. Mechanisms of the national character stereotype: how people in six neighbouring countries of Russia describe themselves and the typical Russian. European Journal of Personality. 2009;23(3):229–249. DOI: 10.1002/per.719.
  8. Emelyanova TP, Pattison AS. Uniquities of social representations of Russians as viewed by Czechs and Americans. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2019 February 2];5(13). Available from: http:// psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2010n5-13/379-emelyanova-pattison13.html.
  9. Sukhov AN, Derkach AA. Prikladnaya sotsial’naya psikhologiya [Applied social psychology]. Moscow: MODEK; 1998. 600 p. Russian.
  10. Fetiskin NP, Kozlov VV, Manuilov GM. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskaya diagnostika razvitiya lichnosti i malykh grupp [Socio-psychological diagnosis of personal development and small groups]. Moscow: Publishing House of the Institute of Psy¬chotherapy; 2002. 490 p. Russian.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-13

How to Cite

[1]
Klimovich, D.V. 2019. Clustering of social representations of tourists from different countries by the hospitality industry employees. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology. 2 (Jun. 2019), 81–90.