Relationship basic beliefs with values and fears of students with different levels of psychological security

Authors

Keywords:

psychological safety, basic beliefs, fears, values

Abstract

The problem of psychological safety and the role of basic beliefs in its maintenance are considered. The basic beliefs of students and the general level of their psychological safety are characterised. The results of the study of students’ fears and values are presented. The article analyses the relationship between basic beliefs and experienced fears and values among students with different levels of psychological safety.

Author Biography

  • Natallia P. Blahenkova, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    senior lecturer at the department of social and organisational psychology, faculty of philosophy and social sciences

References

  1. Aguzumtsyan RV, Muradyan EB. [Psychological aspects of personal safety]. Vestnik prakticheskoi psikhologii obrazovaniya. 2009;2:40–44. Russian.
  2. Verbina GG. [Psychological safety of a person]. Vestnik Chuvashskogo universiteta. 2013;4:196–202. Russian.
  3. Padun MA, Kotel’nikova AV. Modification of R. Janoff-Bulman’s procedure for personality basic beliefs study. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2008;29(4):98–106. Russian.
  4. Janoff-Bulman R. Assumptive worlds and the stress of traumatic events: applications of the schema construct. Social Cognition. 1989;7(2):113–136. DOI: 10.1521/soco.1989.7.2.113.
  5. Padun MA, Tarabrina NV. [Mental trauma and basic cognitive personality schemas]. Konsul’tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya. 2003;11(1):121–141. Russian.
  6. Dauksha VS. Value orientations of modern students of Belarus in different periods of time (2008–2015). World of Science. Pedagogy and psychology [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 April 6];1:1–12. Available from: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/53PSMN118.pdf. Russian.
  7. Pishhik VI. The value dimensions of generations through actualised fears. Social Psychology and Society. 2019;10(2):67–81. DOI: 10.17759/sps.2019100206. Russian.
  8. Shaigerova LA, Prokof’eva TYu, Kravtsova OA, Soldatova GU. Praktikum po psikhodiagnostike i issledovaniyu tolerantnosti lichnosti [Workshop on psychodiagnostics and the study of personality tolerance]. Moscow: MGU imeni M. V. Lomonosova; 2003. 112 р. Russian.
  9. Bogomaz SA, Gladkikh AG. [Psychological safety and its measurement using the scale of basic beliefs]. Tomsk State University Journal. 2009;318:191–194. Russian.
  10. Bogomaz SA, Kozlova NV. [A model of personal development of adolescents and young men, taking into account their feelings of self-security in the context of the transformation of Russian society]. Siberian Journal of Psychology. 2010;36:14–19. Russian.
  11. Bocharova EE. [Regulatory and worldview factors of various forms of social activity of young people]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya Akmeologiya obrazovaniya. Psikhologiya razvitiya. 2018;7(4):333–345. Russian. DOI: 10.18500/2304-9790-2018-7-4-333-345.
  12. Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry. 2004;15(1):1–18.
  13. Rasskazova EI, Emelin VA, Tkhostov ASh. Diagnostika psikhologicheskikh posledstvii vliyaniya informatsionnykh tekhnologii na cheloveka [Diagnostics of the psychological consequences of the influence of information technology on a person]. Moscow: Akropol’; 2015. p. 74–76. Russian.
  14. Sapozhnikova RB. [Analysis of the concept of «identity»: theoretical and methodological foundations]. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2005;1:13–17. Russian.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-30

How to Cite

[1]
Blahenkova, N.P. 2021. Relationship basic beliefs with values and fears of students with different levels of psychological security. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology. 3 (Sep. 2021), 92–102.