Poetisation of nature and thinking: a comparative analysis of the projects of M. Heidegger and R. W. Emerson

Authors

  • Emile Alexandrov The University of Notre Dame Australia, 23 High Street, Fremantle 6160, Australia

Keywords:

M. Heidegger, R. W. Emerson, S. Cavell, nature, education, nonobjectification, renunciation, metaphysics

Abstract

Scholarship of Martin M. Heidegger’s relation to R. W. Emerson is seldom conducted, notwithstanding limited engagement on the part of S. Cavell. Considering the influence R. W. Emerson had on F. Nietzsche, and the significant influence the latter had on M. Heidegger, any necessary relation needs to be studied. The author of this paper confirms this relatability in the role that nature plays in the writings of both M. Heidegger and R. W. Emerson. Both thinkers show that in the poetising of nature, the poet is not making assertions as such, rather imparting upon receiving from nature as that which «educates». The author reveals this feature to be central to the poet figure of both M. Heidegger and R. W. Emerson, and both agree that it is exhibited by few remarkable figures throughout history. However, the limit of their congruency, as the author argues, is in M. Heidegger and R. W. Emerson’s disagreement regarding the relation of poetry to thought.

Author Biography

  • Emile Alexandrov, The University of Notre Dame Australia, 23 High Street, Fremantle 6160, Australia

    PhD (philosophy); junior researcher at the department of philosophy and theology

References

  1. Foerster N. Whitman as a poet of nature. PMLA. 19164;4:736–758. DOI: 10.2307/456988.
  2. Cavell S. Thinking of Emerson. New Literary History. 1979;1:167–176. DOI: 10.2307/468877.
  3. Cavell S. Conditions handsome and unhandsome: the constitution of Emersonian perfectionism. La Salle: Open Court; 1990. 163 p.
  4. Macann C, editor. Martin Heidegger: critical assesments. Volume III. London: Routledge; 1992. 296 p.
  5. Polt R. Time and trauma: thinking through Heidegger in the thirties. London: Rowman & Littlefield International; 2019. 302 p.
  6. Kahn CH. The art and thought of Heraclitus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001. 354 p.
  7. Risser J. Heidegger toward the turn: essays on the work of the 1930s. Albany: State University of New York; 1999. 364 p.
  8. Bambach C, Theodore G. Philosophers and their poets: reflections on the poetic turn in philosophy since Kant. Albany: State University of New York; 2019. 281 p.
  9. Plato. Complete works. Cooper JM, Hutchinson DS, editors. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company; 1997. 1848 p.
  10. Cassin B, Apter E, Lezra J, Wood M, editors. Dictionary of untranslatables: a philosophical lexicon. Rendall S, Hubert C, Mehlman J, Stein N, Syrotinski M, translators. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2014. 1344 p.
  11. Wrathall M, editor. The Cambridge Heidegger lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2021. 906 p.
  12. Vallega-Neu D. Heidegger’s poietic writings: from contributions to philosophy to the event. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 2018. 256 p.
  13. Cavell S. Aversive thinking: Emersonian representations in Heidegger and Nietzsche. New Literary History. 1991;1:129–160. DOI: 10.2307/469146.
  14. Moore JB. Emerson on Wordsworth. PMLA. 1926;1:179–192. DOI: 10.2307/457658.
  15. Urbas J. The philosophy of Ralph Waldo Emerson. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group; 2021. 304 p.
  16. Cavell S. This new yet unapproachable America: lectures after Emerson after Wittgenstein. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2013. 144 p.
  17. Schirmeister P. Less legible meanings: between poetry and philosophy in the work of Emerson. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1999. 240 p.
  18. Urbas J. How close a reader of Emerson is Stanley Cavell? The Journal of Speculative Philosophy. 2017;4:557–574. DOI: 10.5325/jspecphil.31.4.0557.
  19. Porte J. Review of Emerson and Thoreau in France, by Michel Granger, Sandra Laugier, François Brunet, and Anne Wicke. The New England Quarterly. 2003;3:456–466. DOI: 10.2307/1559811.
  20. Cavell S. Night and day: Heidegger and Thoreau. Revue Française D Etudes Américaines. 2002;1:110. DOI: 10.3917/rfea.091.0110.
  21. Bruns GL. Stanley Cavell’s Shakespeare. Critical Inquiry. 1990;3:612–632.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-28

Issue

No. 3 (2022): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology

Section

History of Philosophy

License

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)

How to Cite

[1]
Alexandrov, E. 2022. Poetisation of nature and thinking: a comparative analysis of the projects of M. Heidegger and R. W. Emerson. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology. 3 (Sep. 2022), 4–12.