Жизнестойкость личности с различным травматическим опытом

  • Дарья Рустемовна Шарипова Белорусский государственный университет, пр. Независимости, 4, 220030, г. Минск, Беларусь

Аннотация

Дополнено определение жизнестойкости в психологии. Проанализировано понятие жизнестойкости у разных авторов, выделены общие характеристики. Описана структурная модель жизнестойкости. В этой модели определены психологические факторы жизнестойкости, новообразования личности с различным травматическим опытом, а также способы, помогающие справляться с ними (такие компоненты жизнестойкости, как вовлеченность, контроль и принятие риска). Представлены три техники работы с травматическими переживаниями в контексте жизнестойкости. На примере исследований раскрыты особенности жизнестойкости личности с различным травматическим опытом. Выявлены психологические факторы выбора определенного (жизнестойкого или виктимного) способа совладания с травматическим опытом.

Биография автора

Дарья Рустемовна Шарипова, Белорусский государственный университет, пр. Независимости, 4, 220030, г. Минск, Беларусь

аспирантка кафедры общей и медицинской психологии факультета философии и социальных наук. Научный руководитель – кандидат психологических наук, доцент А. С. Солодухо

Литература

  1. Leont’ev DA, Rasskazova EI. Test zhiznestoikosti [Resilience test]. Moscow: Smysl; 2006. 63 p. Russian.
  2. Loginova MV, Odintsova MA. [Vitality as a way out of oneself and the realisation of human essence]. In: Zhuravlev AL, Barabanshchikov VA, Volovikova MI, editors. Psikhologiya cheloveka v sovremennom mire. Tom 1. Kompleksnyi i sistemnyi podkhody v issledovaniyakh psikhologii cheloveka. Lichnost’ kak sub’ekt zhiznennogo puti. Materialy Vserossiiskoi yubileinoi nauchnoi konferentsii, posvyashchennoi 120-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya S. L. Rubinshteina; 15–16 oktyabrya 2009 g.; Moskva, Rossiya [Human psychology in the modern world. Volume 1. Comprehensive and systematic approaches in the study of human psychology. Personality as a subject of the life path. Materials of the All-Russian jubilee scientific conference dedicated to the 120th anniversary of the birth of S. L. Rubinshtein; 2009 October 15–16; Moscow, Russia]. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2009. p. 266–272. Russian.
  3. Fominova AN. Zhiznestoikost’ lichnosti [Resilience of personality]. Moscow: Protemei; 2012. 152 p. Russian.
  4. Maddi SR. [Meaning-making in decision-making]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2005;26(6):87–101. Russian.
  5. Loginova MV. Vitality as an internal key resource of the person. Vestnik of Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2009;6:19–22. Russian.
  6. Soboleva EV, Shumakova OA. The phenomenon of hardiness in foreign and domestic research. Modern Scientific Research and Innovation [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2022 September 2];5(part 2). Available from: https://web.snauka.ru/issues/2014/05/34519. Russian.
  7. Ovcharova RV. Research methodology of personality hardiness. Bulletin of Kurgan State University. 2019;2:59–65. Russian.
  8. Yaroshchuk IV. The psychology of hardiness: a review of theoretical concepts, empirical research and diagnostic techniques. Scientific Notes of the Saint Petersburg State Institute of Psychology and Social Work. 2020;33(1):50–60. Russian.
  9. Galiev RR. Research review of personality resilience. Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics. 2022;1:129–133. Russian.
  10. Amanova IK, Beletskaya AK. Theoretical view of the problem of resilience in psychological science. Bulletin Series: Psychology [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 November 28];62(1). Available from: https://bulletin-psychology.kaznpu.kz/index.php/ped/article/view/4. Russian.
  11. Gainullina SM. [The study of the phenomenon of «resilience» in domestic and foreign psychology]. In: Dmitrieva LG, editor. Psikhologiya dialoga i mir cheloveka: pamyati G.V. D’yakonova. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Psychology of dialogue and the human world: in memory of G. V. Dyakonov. Collection of scientific papers]. Moscow: Editorial and Publishing Centre Bashkir State University; 2019. p. 213–217. Russian.
  12. Selivanova OA, Bystrova NV, Derecha II. Studying the phenomenon of resistance: problems and prospects. World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 September 5];8(3). Available from: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/04PSMN320.pdf. Russian.
  13. Khanova ZG, Simonova DI. [The concept of resilience as a phenomenon in the scientific literature]. In: Murzina ZhV, editor. Pedagogika, psikhologiya, obshchestvo: ot teorii k praktike. Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii; 30 iyulya 2021 g.; Cheboksary, Rossiya [Pedagogy, psychology, society: from theory to practice. Materials of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference; 2021 July 30; Cheboksary, Russia]. Cheboksary: Sreda; 2021. р. 270–274. Russian.
  14. Evtushenko EA. [Personality resilience as a psychological phenomenon] In: Vasinovich MA, editor. Lichnost’, sem’ya i obshchestvo: voprosy pedagogiki i psikhologii. Sbornik statei po materialam LX Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii; 28 yanvarya 2016 g.; Novosibirsk, Rossiya [Personality, family and society: issues of pedagogy and psychology. Collection of articles based on the materials of the 60th International scientific and practical conference; 2016 January 28; Novosibirsk, Russia]. Novosibirsk: SibAK; 2016. p. 72–78. Russian.
  15. Nikitina EV. [The phenomenon of resilience: concept, modern views and research]. Academy. 2017;4:100–103. Russian.
  16. Bonanno GA. Loss, trauma, and human resilience: have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely adverse events? American Psychologist. 2004;59:20–28.
  17. Bonanno GA, Mancini AD. The human capacity to thrive in the face of potential trauma. Journal Pediatrics. 2008;121(2):369–375.
  18. Mitrofanova EN. «Two courage»: towards the concept of hardiness of S. Maddi. Vestnik Permskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarno-pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya 1, Psikhologicheskie i pedagogicheskie nauki. 2018;1:17–26. Russian.
  19. Volobueva NM, Serezhko TA. Hardiness and religiousness as resources of modern man in difficult situations. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2015;28(24):151–158. Russian.
  20. Tuvysheva DA, Atamаnova G.I. Empirical study of relationship between quality of life-resistance and value-sense orientations of the person. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 2020;1:155–163. Russian. DOI: 10.20323/1813-145Х-2020-1-112-155-163
  21. Morozova IS, Medovikova EA. [Resilience in the aspect of psychological security of a person]. In: Blagov YuV, Lashuk OV, editors. Materialy XVIII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Tatishchevskie chteniya: aktual’nye problemy nauki i praktiki». Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, obrazovanie. Aktual’nye problemy ekologii i okhrany okruzhayushchei sredy. Tom 2; 23-24 aprelya 2021 g.; Tol’yatti, Rossiya [Proceedings of the 18th International scientific and practical conference «Tatishchev’s readings: actual problems of science and practice». Humanities and social sciences, education. Actual problems of ecology and environmental protection. Volume 2; 2021 April 23–24; Tolyatti, Russia]. Tolyatti: Volga University named after V. N. Tatishchev; 2021. p. 40–46. Russian.
  22. Grigorova YuB. Dependence of emotional wellbeing on resilience. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 2019;3:111–118. Russian. DOI: 10.24411/1813-145X-2019-10423.
  23. Shaymukhametova SF. Satisfaction with quality of life as a correlate of resilience personality. Azimuth of Scientific Research: Pedagogy and Psychology. 2019;8(2):406–408. Russian. DOI: 10.26140/anip-2019-0802-0091.
  24. Sheleketa VO, Kazintseva NO. The situation of a pandemic as a stress test for the resilience of an individual: problems and prospects for sociological assessing existential modes in the context of S. Muddy method. Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics, Sociology and Management. 2021;11(2):180–191. Russian.
  25. Tsaritsentseva OP, Elfimova MM. Coping with the reality situation during the COVID-19 pandemic in the context of individual resilience. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2021;23(1):191–201. Russian. DOI: 10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-1-191-201.
  26. Yasko BA, Kazarin BV, Gorodin VN, Chugunova NA, Pokul LV, Skripnichenko LS et al. Hardiness and personal resources of red zone staff: psychological analysis. Bulletin of Russian State Medical University. 2021;4:68–76. Russian. DOI: 10.24075/vrgmu.2021.042.
  27. Evseenkova EV. Hardiness in pandemic conditions. Herald of Omsk University. Series: Psychology. 2021;4:20–26. Russian. DOI: 10.24147/2410-6364.2021.4.20-26.
  28. Ukolova YuV. [The relationship between the resilience of personality and behaviour in a conflict situation]. In: Osipova NV, editor. Molodezh’ v nauke i tvorchestve. Chast’ 3. Pedagogika i psikhologiya v praktike sovremennogo obrazovaniya. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii; 8 aprelya 2020 g.; Gzhel’, Rossiya [Youth in science and creativity. Part 3. Pedagogy and psychology in the practice of modern education. Materials of the International scientific and practical conference; 2020 April 8; Gzhel, Russia]. Gzhel: Gzhel State University; 2020. р. 287–288. Russian.
  29. Turikova EG. [Features of resilience as a resource of personality in a situation of chronic disease]. In: Pigulevskii VO, Zemelev SN, Sinchenko TYu, Rutta NA, Neutov VD, editors. Lichnost’. Kommunikatsii. Praktika [Personality. Communications. Practice]. Rostov-on-Don: Nauka-Spektr; 2020. р. 151–157. Russian.
  30. Muzaleva DA. Professional resilience of a teacher as a special case of personality resilience. World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 November 29];10(3). Available from: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/43PDMN322.pdf. Russian.
  31. Kislyakov PA, Shmeleva EA, Kol’chugina NI, Phan TK. Hardiness and psycho-logical safety of a teacher in an educational environment. The Education and Science Journal. 2022;24(9):143–173. Russian.
  32. Dyssembekova KS, Nagimjanova KM. Dynamics of development of hardiness as a factor in the formation of successful activity in the population future teachers – psychologists. Pedagogy and Psychology. 2021;47(2):89–101. Russian. DOI: 10.51889/2021-2.2077-6861.09.
  33. Drobysheva KA, Gorskaya GB. Personality regulators of hardinessformation in individual and team sports. In: Akhmetov SM, Tarasenko AA, Aleksanyants GD, Pogrebnoi AI, Chernyshenko YuK, Shestakov MM, et al., editors. Ezhegodnaya otchetnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya aspirantov i soiskatelei Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta fizicheskoi kul’tury, sporta i turizma; 29 maya 2020 g.; Krasnodar, Rossiya [The annual reporting scientific conference of postgraduate students and applicants of the Kuban State University of physical culture, sports and tourism; 2020 May 29; Krasnodar, Russia]. Krasnodar: Kuban State University of Physical Culture, Sports and Tourism; 2020. р. 114–119. Russian.
  34. Zelenova ME, Lekalov AA, Lim VS. [Resilience in the regulation of functional states of pilots]. In: Banshchikova TN, Fomina EA, Morosanova VI, editors. Lichnostnye i regulyatornye resursy dostizheniya obrazovatel’nykh i professional’nykh tselei v epokhu tsifrovizatsii. Materialy Mezhdunarodnai nauchno-prakticheskaoi konferentsii; 22–23 oktyabrya 2020 g.; Moskva, Rossiya [Personal and regulatory resources for achieving educational and professional goals in the era of digitalisation. Materials of the International scientific and practical conference; 2020 October 22–23; Moscow, Russia]. Moscow: Znanie-M; р. 506–516. Russian.
  35. Krasnaya EV. Personal determinants of educational activity of students of creative specialties of pedagogical university. Psychology. Historical-Critical Reviews and Current Researches. 2019;1а:334. Russian.
  36. Pismenyuk ES. Hardiness and motivation of managers in stressfull situations. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Psychology. 2018;11(3):32–39. Russian. DOI: 10.14529/psy180304.
  37. Khlestov E.V. Psychological conditions for the formation of resilience of adolescents in the process of family education. Pedagogy: History, Prospects. 2022;5(4):93–105. Russian. DOI: 10.17748/2686–9969–2022–5-4-93-105.
  38. Krivobokov AS. Child resilience in the structure of family relationships. In: Sitnikov VL, editor. Sem’ya i deti v sovremennom mire. Materialy Mezhdunarodnai konferentsii. Tom V; aprel’ 2019; Sankt-Peterburg, Rossiya [Family and children in the modern world. Materials of the International conference. Volume V; April 2019; Saint Petersburg, Russia]. Saint Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo RGPU imeni A. I. Gertsena; 2019. р. 506–511. Russian.
  39. Egorova OI, Efimova OI. [The influence of family on the formation and development of resilience]. In: Ershova RV, editor. Prikladnaya psikhologiya na sluzhbe razvivayushcheisya lichnosti [Applied psychology on the service of a developing personality]. Kolomna: Kolomna State Social and Humanitarian University; 2019. p. 54–58. Russian.
  40. Grekhova NA, Kameneva GN. [The role of the family in shaping the resilience of adolescents]. In: Kudinova SI, Mikhailova OB, editors. Lichnost’ v sovremennom mire: obrazovanie, razvitie, samorealizatsiya. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii; 19–20 noyabrya 2020 g.; Moskva, Rossiya [Personality in the modern world: education, development, self-realisation. Materials of the International scientific and practical conference; 2020 November 19–20; Moscow, Russia]. Moscow: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia; 2020. p. 285–290. Russian.
  41. Grigorova YuB. [Gender and age characteristics of resilience]. E-Scio. 2019;5:395–400. Russian.
  42. Alikin IA, Alikin MI, Lukyanchenko NV. Relationship between hardiness in students and their parents’ attitude to them. Psychological Science and Education. 2020;25(3):75–89. Russian.
  43. Postnikova MI, Miklyaeva AV, Sivrikova NV, Regush LA. Changes in the hardiness of generations’ representatives of Russians at the beginning of the 21st century. Social Psychology and Society. 2022;13(1):87–103. Russian.
  44. Kornilova TV. Modern foreign studies of the phenomenon of hardiness. Vestnik of Kostroma State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics. 2020;26(4):223–229. Russian. DOI: 10.34216/2073-1426-2020-26-4-223-229.
  45. Rasskazova EI. [Resilience and the choice of the future in the process of rehabilitation]. Izvestiya Yuzhnogo federal’nogo universiteta. Tekhnicheskie nauki. 2005;7:124–126. Russian.
  46. Ruppert F. [Psychological trauma]. Voprosy mental’noy medetsiny i ecologii. 2012;18(4):81–92. Russian.
  47. Odintsova MA. Coping-strategies of behavior of persons with similar traumatic experience. Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy. 2015;15(1):104–110. Russian.
  48. Odintsova MA. Overcoming stress students with different levels of hardness. Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy. 2016;16(2):191–198. Russian. DOI: 10.18500/1819-7671-2016-16-2-191-198.
  49. Budykin SV, Dvoryanchikov NV. Psychological effects of extreme situations in law enforcement officers and civilians. Psychological Science and Education. 2013;18(2):5-13. Russian.
  50. Ekimova VI, Luchnikova EP. Complex psychological trauma as a consequence of extreme stress. Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology. 2020;9(1):50–61. Russian.
  51. Lyubimova EA. [Factors of resistance to psychological trauma (based on materials of foreign studies)]. In: Ershova IA, editor. Aktual’nye problemy ekstremal’noi i krizisnoi psikhologii. Materialy III Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii; 2 aprelya 2021 g.; Ekaterinburg, Rossiya [Actual problems of extreme and crisis psychology. Materials of the 3rd All-Russian scientific and practical conference; 2021 April 2; Yekaterinburg, Russia]. Yekaterinburg: Izdatel’stvo Ural’skogo universiteta; 2021. р. 56–58. Russian.
  52. Rodionova EB. [Psychological trauma: features and prerequisites of occurrence]. In: Murzina ZhV, editor. Obrazovanie i pedagogika: perspektivy razvitiya. Vserossiiskaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya; 16 oktyabrya 2020 g.; Cheboksary, Rossiya [Education and pedagogy: prospects for development. All-Russian scientific and practical conference; 2020 October 16; Cheboksary, Russia]. Cheboksary: Sreda; 2020. p. 163–165. Russian.
  53. Egorova LKh. [Psychological trauma and its features during the social crisis in society]. In: Koval NA, editor. Razvitie lichnosti: psikhologo-pedagogicheskie problemy. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Personality development: psychological and pedagogical problems. Collection of scientific papers]. Tambov: Print-Servis; 2019. p. 111–115. Russian.
Опубликован
2023-01-25
Ключевые слова: жизнестойкость, вовлеченность, контроль, принятие риска, структурная модель жизнестойкости, психологическая травма, ситуативная реконструкция, фокусирование, компенсаторное самосовершенствование, виктимная и жизнестойкая стратегия преодоления
Как цитировать
Шарипова, Д. Р. (2023). Жизнестойкость личности с различным травматическим опытом. Журнал Белорусского государственного университета. Философия. Психология, 1, 95-105. Доступно по https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/philosophy/article/view/5136
Выпуск
№ 1 (2023): Журнал Белорусского государственного университета. Философия. Психология
Раздел
Психологические исследования

Copyright (c) 2023 Журнал Белорусского государственного университета. Философия. Психология

Лицензия Creative Commons

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование») 4.0 Всемирная.

Авторы, публикующиеся в данном журнале, соглашаются со следующим:

  1. Авторы сохраняют за собой авторские права на работу и предоставляют журналу право первой публикации работы на условиях лицензии Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. Авторы сохраняют право заключать отдельные контрактные договоренности, касающиеся неэксклюзивного распространения версии работы в опубликованном здесь виде (например, размещение ее в институтском хранилище, публикацию в книге) со ссылкой на ее оригинальную публикацию в этом журнале.
  3. Авторы имеют право размещать их работу в интернете (например, в институтском хранилище или на персональном сайте) до и во время процесса рассмотрения ее данным журналом, так как это может привести к продуктивному обсуждению и большему количеству ссылок на данную работу. (См. The Effect of Open Access).