«Smart polemos»: artificial intelligence in information wars

Authors

  • Sergey N. Fedorchenko Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory, Moscow 119991, Russia

Keywords:

«smart polemos», artificial intelligence, information wars, algorithms, information and psychological influence, political manipulation, digital ecumene

Abstract

The article reveals the specific features of using artificial intelligence technologies in modern information wars and conceptualises the political phenomenon of «smart polemos». Within the framework of the new concept of «smart polemos», it is proposed to focus the attention of researchers on the practices of using algorithms in information confrontation, including armed conflicts. A wide range of «smart polemos» technologies is shown (from digital manipulations, digital propaganda, creating deepfakes to combat operations support systems and cyberweapons use practices). It is concluded that, despite the challenges and risks of developing «smart polemos» in the field of supporting information and combat operations, intelligent systems are more often used in digital psychological manipulations. Cases of political intrigue created through the use of artificial intelligence in information operations are studied; the use of a multi-move strategic scenario, the presence of a customer, his goals and a «target»-victim in the structure of these intrigues are noted. In response to the challenges, threats and risks of «smart polemos», an ecumenical approach is proposed which implies the formation of a digital ecumene of the state and its allies.

Author Biography

  • Sergey N. Fedorchenko, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory, Moscow 119991, Russia

    doctor of science (politics), docent; associate professor at the department of history and theory of politics, faculty of political science

References

  1. Cheney-Lippold J. A new algorithmic identity: soft biopolitics and the modulation of control. Theory, Culture & Society. 2011;28(6):164–181. DOI: 10.1177/02632764114244.
  2. Расторгуев СП. Планирование и моделирование информационной операции. Информационные войны. 2014;1:2–10. EDN: RUXFYP.
  3. Переслегин СБ. Первая мировая. Война между реальностями. Том 2. Москва: Яуза; 2020. 608 с.
  4. Guyonneau R, le Dez A. Artificial intelligence in digital warfare: introducing the concept of the cyberteammate. The Cyber Defense Review. 2019;4(2):103–116.
  5. Киссинджер Г, Шмидт Э, Хаттенлокер Д. Искусственный разум и новая эра человечества. Ахметов К, переводчик. Якимова Е, редактор. Москва: Альпина про; 2022. 200 с.
  6. Yamin MM, Ullah M, Ullah H, Katt B. Weaponized AI for cyber attacks. Journal of Information Security and Applications. 2021;57:102722. DOI: 10.1016/j.jisa.2020.102722.
  7. Разуваев ВВ. Анатомия политической интриги. Москва, Санкт-Петербург: Центр гуманитарных инициатив; 2019. 184 с.
  8. Маклюэн МГ. Понимание медиа. Внешние расширения человека. Николаев В, переводчик. Москва: Кучково поле; 2023. 464 с.
  9. Нестик ТА, Михеев ЕА. Информационные войны с использованием систем искусственного интеллекта: анализ психологических механизмов воздействия. Институт психологии Российской академии наук. Организационная психология и психология труда. 2019;4(4):148–174. EDN: VOXRQM.
  10. Володенков СВ. Цифровые актанты и вычислительная пропаганда как инструменты воздействия на массовое сознание в условиях глобальных технологических трансформаций. Вестник Московского университета. Серия 12, Политические науки. 2024;2:47–70. DOI: 10.55959/MSU0868-4871-12-2024-2-2-47-70.
  11. Rivera J-P, Mukobi G, Reuel A, Lamparth M, Smith Ch, Schneider J. Escalation risks from language models in military and diplomatic decision-making. In: ACM FAccT Executive Committee. FAccT ‘24. Proceedings of the 2024 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2024. p. 836–898. DOI: 10.1145/3630106.365894.
  12. Argyle LP, Busby EC, Fulda N, Gubler JR, Rytting C, Wingate D. Out of one, many: using language models to simulate human samples. Political Analysis. 2023;31(3):337–351. DOI: 10.1017/pan.2023.2.
  13. Доброродний ДГ, Верещако АИ. Статус технических объектов с искусственным интеллектом в современном обществе. Журнал Белорусского государственного университета. Философия. Психология. 2024;1:66–74. EDN: IALYPG.
  14. Володенков СВ, Федорченко СН. Особенности феномена субъектности в условиях современных технологических трансформаций. Полис. Политические исследования. 2022;5:40–55. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2022.05.04.
  15. Kai-Cheng Yang, Menczer F. Anatomy of an AI-powered malicious social botnet. Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media. 2024;4:1–36.
  16. Pajkovic N. Algorithms and taste-making: exposing the Netflix recommender system’s operational logics. Convergence. 2022;28(1):214–235. DOI: 10.1177/13548565211014464.
  17. Hameleers M, van der Meer TGLA, Dobber T. You won’t believe what they just said! The effects of political deepfakes embedded as vox populi on social media. Social Media + Society. 2022;8(3):1–12. DOI: 10.1177/20563051221116346.
  18. Ienca M. On artificial intelligence and manipulation. Topoi. An International Review of Philosophy. 2023;42:833–842. DOI: 10.1007/s11245-023-09940-3.
  19. Ullrich QJ. Is this video real? The principal mischief of deepfakes and how the lanham act can address it. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems. 2021;55(1):5–6.
  20. Simchon A, Edwards M, Lewandowsky S. The persuasive effects of political microtargeting in the age of generative artificial intelligence. PNAS Nexus. 2024;3(2):1–4. DOI:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae035.
  21. Matz SC, Teeny JD, Vaid SS, Peters H, Harari GM, Cerf M. The potential of generative AI for personalized persuasion at scale. Scientific reports. 2024;14(1):1–17. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00637.
  22. Mathur A, Acar G, Friedman M, Lucherini E, Mayer J, Chetty M, et al. Dark patterns at scale: findings from a crawl of 11 K shopping websites. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 2019;3:1–32. DOI: 10.1145/3359183.
  23. Kozyreva A, Lewandowsky S, Hertwig R. Citizens versus the Internet: confronting digital challenges with cognitive tools. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2020;21(3):103–156. DOI: 10.1177/1529100620946707.
  24. Федорченко СН. Государство-цивилизация в цифровой ойкумене. Журнал политических исследований. 2023;7(1):3–26. DOI: 10.12737/2587-6295-2023-7-1-3-26.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-11

Issue

No. 2 (2025): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology

Section

Social Philosophy

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)

How to Cite

[1]
Fedorchenko, S.N. 2025. «Smart polemos»: artificial intelligence in information wars. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology. 2 (Jul. 2025), 13–22.