The dynamic structure of aesthetic experience

Authors

  • Alexey M. Polyakov Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus
  • Maria V. Pugach Belarusian State Pedagogical University named after Maxim Tank, 18 Savieckaja Street, Minsk 220030, Belarus

Keywords:

experience, aesthetic experience, structure of aesthetic experience, psychological mechanisms of aesthetic experience, artistic image, sign, symbol

Abstract

The article deals with the dynamic structure of aesthetic experience as a step-by-step comprehension of the artistic image. The sign and symbolic ways of understanding the artistic image are described. The article presents an analysis of the psychological mechanisms of identification, interpretation, resistance in the aesthetic experience of the artistic image. The dynamic structure of aesthetic experience can serve as a basis for further construction of the experimental research methodology of this process in ontogenesis. In the dynamic structure of the aesthetic experience, the following components are highlighted: the reconstruction of the objective content of the artistic image, the isolation of the artistic image, awareness of the antinomy of the artistic image, «immersion» in the artistic image, awareness of the inner position, the formation of a subjective attitude to the artistic image.

Author Biographies

  • Alexey M. Polyakov, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliežnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    doctor of science (psychology), docent; associate professor at the department of psychology, faculty of philosophy and social sciences

  • Maria V. Pugach, Belarusian State Pedagogical University named after Maxim Tank, 18 Savieckaja Street, Minsk 220030, Belarus

    competitor at the department of andragogy, faculty of additional professional education

References

  1. Vasilyuk FE. Psikhologiya perezhivaniya (analiz preodoleniya kriticheskikh situatsii) [Psychology of experience (analysis of overcoming critical situations)]. Moscow: Moscow State University; 1984. 200 p. Russian.
  2. Pergamenshchik LA. Vvedenie v krizisnuyu psikhologiyu. Kurs lektsii [Introduction to crisis psychology. Course of lectures]. Minsk: Belarusian State Pedagogical Institute; 2003. 240 p. Russian.
  3. Langle A. Existential analytic understanding of emotion: theory and practice. National Psychological Journal. 2015;1(17):26–38. Russian. DOI: 10.11621/npj.2015.0104.
  4. Vygotskiy LS. Lektsii po pedologii [Lectures on pedology]. Izhevsk: Udmurt universitety; 2001. 304 p. Russian.
  5. Zherebcov SN. Psikhologiya perezhivanii lichnosti v dinamike kul’tury: Antichnost’, Srednevekov’e, Vozrozhdenie [Psychology of personal experiences in the dynamics of culture: Antiquity, Middle Ages, Renaissance]. Mozyr: Sodejstvie; 2013. 184 p. Russian.
  6. Shpet GG. Art as a kind of knowledge (etude). Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psihologiya. 2006;4:25–35. Russian.
  7. Zinchenko VP. [Psychological aspects of art’s influence on man]. Cultural-Historical Psychology. 2006;4:3–21. Russian.
  8. Ilyenkov EV. Ob esteticheskoi prirode fantazii. Chto tam v Zazerkal’e? [On the aesthetic nature of fantasy. What is there in the Looking Glass?]. Moskow: LIBROKOM; 2014. 128 p. Russian.
  9. Podoprigora SYa, Podoprigora AS, compilers. Filosofskii slovar’ [Philosophical Dictionary]. 2nd edition. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks; 2013. 562 p. Russian.
  10. Vygotsky LS. Psikhologiya iskusstva [Psychology of art]. Yaroshewskiy MG, editor. Moscow: Pedagogika; 1987. 344 p. Russian.
  11. Adaskina AA. [Features of the manifestation of the aesthetic attitude in the perception of reality]. Voprosy psikhologii. 1999;6:100–109. Russian.
  12. Emelyanov GA. [The perception of poetic form in adolescence and young adulthood]. Voprosy psikhologii. 1998;1:31–43. Russian.
  13. Granik GG, Koncevaya LA. [Schoolchildren’s perception of artistic text]. Voprosy psikhologii. 1996;3:43–52. Russian.
  14. Kudina GN, Novlyanskaya ZN. [The basic principles and methods of the experimental course «Literature as a subject of the aesthetic cycle»]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie. 1996;4:48–52. Russian.
  15. Alekseev KI. [Metaphor as an object of study in philosophy and psychology]. Voprosy psikhologii. 1996;2:73–84. Russian.
  16. Bahtin MM. Problema soderzhaniya, materiala i formy v slovesnom khudozhestvennom tvorchestve [The problem of content, material and form in verbal art]. In: Bahtin MM. [Questions of literature and aesthetics. The studies in different years]. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura; 1975. p. 6–71. Russian.
  17. Nikitina ES. [On the concept of zero meaning the text]. Cultural-Historical Psychology. 2015;11(2):108–117. Russian.
  18. Ilyin IA. [Fundamentals of art. About the perfect in art]. In: Ilyin IA. Sobranie sochinenii. Tom 6, kniga 1 [Collected works. Volume 6, book 1]. Lisitca YuT, compiler. Moscow: Russkaya kniga; 1996. p. 53–182.
  19. Polyakov AM. Sub’ekt i simvol [Subject and symbol]. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 2014. 255 p. Russian.
  20. Kont-Sponvil A. Filosofskii slovar’ [Philosophical dictionary]. Golovina EV, translator. Moscow: Ehterna; 2012. 752 p. Russian.
  21. Artemyeva EYu. Psikhologiya sub’ektivnoi semantiki [Psychology of subjective semantics]. Moscow: Moscow State University; 1980. 127 p. Russian.
  22. Meshcheryakova BG, Zinchenko VP, editors. Bol’shoi psikhologicheskii slovar’ [Big psychological dictionary]. Saint Petersburg: Prajm-Evroznak; 2003. 632 p. Russian.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-13

How to Cite

[1]
Polyakov, A.M. and Pugach, M.V. 2019. The dynamic structure of aesthetic experience. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology. 2 (Jun. 2019), 115–121.