Socio-cultural space of the city: theoretical conceptualisation and structural analysis

Authors

  • Aliona D. Matusevich Belarusian State University of Culture and Arts, 17 Rabkarawskaja Street, Minsk 220007, Belarus

Keywords:

socio-cultural space, conceptualisation of space, urban environment, relational approach, Setha Low, comparative analysis, theoretical model
Supporting Agencies
The author expresses gratitude to PhD (cultural studies), docent O. M. Sokolova for her assistance in preparing the article.

Abstract

The article reveals the content of the theoretical concept of socio-cultural space of the city in the Russian-language academic tradition. The specificity of the synthetic term «socio-cultural space of the city», which integrates social relations and cultural meanings, is examined, and its methodological vagueness is identified. A comparative analysis of this concept with the differentiated concepts of Western scholarship («social space», «cultural geography») is conducted, demonstrating a fundamental divergence of scientific paradigms. As a result, the productivity of using Setha Low’s concept of «spatialising culture» as a conceptual bridge is substantiated, offering a relational and multidimensional model for the analysis of the urban environment. The scientific novelty of the work lies in overcoming the terminological gap and transitioning to a rigorous analytical application of the concept in urban space research.

Author Biography

  • Aliona D. Matusevich, Belarusian State University of Culture and Arts, 17 Rabkarawskaja Street, Minsk 220007, Belarus

    postgraduate student at the department of cultural studies, faculty of cultural studies and socio-cultu­ral activities

References

  1. Грязнова ЕВ, Афанасьев СВ. К вопросу об определении понятия «социокультурное пространство». Современные исследования социальных проблем. 2019;11(2–1):27–41. EDN: DDKOVC.
  2. Гаврилина ТО. Социокультурное пространство города: структура, функции. Вестник Сургутского государственного педагогического университета. 2019;2:196–205. EDN: RZFAOQ.
  3. Орлова ЕВ. Социокультурное пространство: к определению понятия. Исторические, философские, политические и юридические науки, культурология и искусствоведение. Вопросы теории и практики. 2017;7:149–152. EDN: YTYHPZ.
  4. Вирт Л. Урбанизм как образ жизни. Николаев В, переводчик; Бабицкая В, редактор. Москва: Strelka Press; 2016. 108 с.
  5. Лефевр А. Производство пространства. Стаф И, переводчик. Москва: Strelka Press; 2015. 427 с.
  6. Bourdieu P. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1977. 248 p.
  7. Jackson P. Maps of Meaning: an introduction to cultural geography. London: Unwin Hyman; 1989. 213 p.
  8. Relph E. Place and placelessness. London: Pion; 1976. 156 p.
  9. Хабермас Ю. Структурная трансформация публичной сферы: исследования относительно категории буржуазного общества. Иванова ВВ, переводчик. Москва: Весь мир; 2016. 342 с.
  10. Фуко М. Надзирать и наказывать. Рождение тюрьмы. Наумова В, переводчик; Борисова И, редактор. Москва: Ad Marginem; 1999. 478 с.
  11. Харви Д. Социальная справедливость и город. Москва: Новое литературное обозрение; 2018. 435 с.
  12. Tuan Y-F. Space and place: the perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1977. VI, 235 p.
  13. Massey D. For space. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2005. 222 p.
  14. Rodman MC. Empowering place: multilocality and multivocality. American Anthropologist. 1992;94(3):640–656.
  15. Ingold T. Footprints through the weather-world: walking, breathing, knowing. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2010;16(s1):121–139. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01613.x.
  16. Лоу С. Пространственное воплощение культуры: этнография пространства и места. Проценко Н, переводчик. Москва: Новое литературное обозрение; 2024. 398 с.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-30

Issue

Section

Socio-Cultural Communications

How to Cite

[1]
Matusevich, A.D. 2026. Socio-cultural space of the city: theoretical conceptualisation and structural analysis. Human in the Socio-Cultural Dimension. 1-2 (Oct. 2026), 60–65.