Postmodern archival turn and «archive fever» of the Belarusian folklore community

  • Hanna B. Sosnovik Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

Abstract

The article deals with the concept of an archive, which is seen in postmodernism as an ordered, power-determined representation of the past within a certain community. This kind of archive is full of ambiguities, lacunas and distortions, which makes the past unavailable in some objective, pure form. According to J. Derrida contemporary culture is gripped by «archive fever», the desire to find out what of the events, objects, ideas of the past was intentionally or accidentally cashed and hidden. Conceptually, this «archive fever» is an expression of such trend of contemporary culture as its orientation towards the past. This tendency is manifested in Belarus as well, in particular, through increasing attention to Belarusian traditional, or folk cultural forms. In today’s Belarus there is a folklore movement, which responds to global and foreign tendencies. Its representatives in the «archive fever» turn to the lost, displaced cultural forms (such as traditions of amateur photography, village non-professional music, naive drawings on glass), investigate what place they occupied in the past and how they can be actualised in the present.

Author Biography

Hanna B. Sosnovik, Belarusian State University, 4 Niezaliezhnasci Avenue, Minsk 220030, Belarus

master’s degree student at the department of cultural studies, faculty of social and cultural communications

 

References

  1. Sebald WG. Austerlitz [Internet]. New York: Modern Library; 2002 [cited 2023 July 5]. Available from: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5ce3d1e94eeb4800018d761c/t/5f5d75acf54b1d69281f52a4/1599960557567/Austerlitz+WG+Sebald.pdf.
  2. Arendt H. The origins of totalitarianism. Cleveland: The World Publishing Company; 2002. 520 p.
  3. Jameson F. Postmodernism, or The cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press; 1991. 461 p.
  4. Deleuze G, Guattari F. Anti­Oedipus: capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2000. 400 p.
  5. Assman A. Zabvenie istorii – oderzhimost’ istoriei [Oblivion of history – obsession with history]. Khlebnikov B, translator and compiler. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; 2019. 552 p. Russian.
  6. Foucault M. The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse of language. Sheridan Smith AM, translator. New York: Pantheon Books; 1972. 245 p.
  7. Khaustov DS. Lektsii po filosofii postmoderna [Lectures on postmodern philosophy]. Moscow: RIPOL classic; 2018. 288 p. Russian.
  8. Derrida J. Archive fever: a Freudian impression. Diacritics. 1995;25(2):9–63. DOI: 10.2307/465144.
  9. Kondakov A. [Queer archive, LGBT museum and the lost boys: two versions of the history of sexuality]. In: Zavadskii A, Sklez V, Suverina K, editors. Politika affekta: muzei kak prostranstvo publichnoi istorii [The politics of affect: the museum as a space of public history]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; 2019. p. 123–147. (Series «Intellektual’naya istoriya»). Russian.
  10. Foster H. An archival impulse. The MIT Press. 2004;110:3–22.
  11. Reynolds S. Retromania: pop culture’s addiction to its own past. New York: Faber and Faber; 2011. 496 p.
  12. Bachmann-Medick D. Cultural turns: new orientations in the study of culture. Blauhut A, translator. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter; 2016. 312 p.
  13. Dubyanetskaya I. Belarusian ethnophilosophy. Science and Innovations. 2021;218(4):64–66. Belarusian.
  14. Barthes R. Mythologies. Lavers А, translator. New York: The Noonday Press; 1991. 164 p.
  15. Stureika S. [Heritage as a discursive conflict, adoption and ritual]. In: Stureika S. CTRL+S. Evropeiskoe nasledie [CTRL+S. European heritage]. Vilnius: Ciklonas; 2022. p. 39–48. Russian.
  16. Darashevich E. [The educational potential of post-folklore]. In: Kozenka MA, compiler. Asoba w narodnaj kul’tury i pedagogicy [Person in traditional culture and pedagogy]. Minsk: IVC Minfina; 2016. p. 13–21. Belarusian.
  17. Leshkevich A. How folk songs interpretations become a part of invented tradition (Belarusian case). In: Toome H-L, Voolaid P, compilers. Perception and perfomativity in arts and culture in the age of technological change. 9th annual conference of the Centre of Excellence in Estonian Studies; 2019 September 5–7; Tartu, Estonia. Tartu: ELM Scholarly Press; 2019. p. 29.
  18. Yaskievich A. [Why is ethno-education necessary in Belarus in the 21st century?]. In: Lozka AJu, Kozenka MA, compilers. Tradycyjnaja kul’tura i dzeci: prablemy jetnavyhavannja. Matjeryjaly VI Rjespublikanskaj navukova­praktychnaj kanferjencyi; 10 lipenja 2020 g.; Minsk, Belarus’ [Traditional culture and children: problems of ethno-education. Materials of the 6th Republican scientific and practical conference; 2020 July 10; Minsk, Belarus]. Minsk: IVC Minfina; 2018. p. 187–193. Belarusian.
  19. Labachewskaya V. Belaruskija poscilki i dyvany: antrapalogija i mastactva tradycyjnaj rjechy [Belarusian bedspreads and carpets: anthropology and art of traditional things]. Minsk: Belaruskaja navuka; 2021. 286 p. Belarusian.
Published
2024-04-09
Keywords: orientation to the past, archive, tradition, Belarusian traditional culture, Belarusian folklore community
How to Cite
Sosnovik, H. B. (2024). Postmodern archival turn and «archive fever» of the Belarusian folklore community. Human in the Socio-Cultural Dimension, 1, 32-39. Retrieved from https://journals.bsu.by/index.php/pitscd/article/view/5986
Issue
No 1 (2024): Human in the Socio-Cultural Dimension
Section
World and National Culture