Cancelling as a social phenomenon: theoretical aspect

Authors

  • Valentina A. Simkhovich Belarus State Economic University, 26 Partyzanski Avenue, Minsk 220070, Belarus
  • Dzmitry I. Naumau Belarus State Academy of Communications, 8/2 F. Skaryna Street, 1 building, Minsk 220076, Belarus

Keywords:

cancelling, social practices, objects of cancelling, social pressure, social media

Abstract

Cancelling is considered as a totality of social practices used by the society or its part to force social pressure on an individual, group, community or organisation. The main forms and goals of cancelling in various spheres of society are identified, the need for its interdisciplinary research on the methodological basis is given grounds for. The phenomenon of cancelling is considered in different theoretical frameworks. The conflictological interpretation of cancelling focuses on the actors’ struggle for material and non-material resources that unfolds mainly in illegal forms. Due to its great destructive potential cancelling is highlighted as a potential danger to economic and labour relations. The political-discursive interpretation considers the phenomenon from the viewpoint of cultural resistance to structural violence undertaken by the marginal groups when it is difficult to call the representatives of elite groups to account due to their privileged position. Designated are some features of development of the phenomenon of cancelling in a modern society: normative blurring of cancelling practices, lack of innovative potential and ability to radically change social relations in a modern society, low efficiency and imitative nature of cancelling practices, transfer of the normative foundations of the minorities’ social practices into a universalist context and establishment of privileges for representatives of certain communities, social selectivity and economic motivation of cancelling with the representatives of elite communities. It is recognised that cancelling expansion into the economic, political and cultural spheres of a modern society results in initiating the processes which can be dangerous for its development. Сancelling practices do not only create opportunities and socio-cultural innovations for an individual, but also cause significant problems and obstacles for his professional and other activities. For the society as a whole, cancelling is becoming a source of conflict processes that, instead of fighting the real causes and factors of social oppression, creates new ideological grounds and mechanisms for discrimination.

Author Biographies

  • Valentina A. Simkhovich, Belarus State Economic University, 26 Partyzanski Avenue, Minsk 220070, Belarus

    doctor of science (sociology), full professor; professor at the department of economic sociology and psychology of entrepreneurship, Institute of Social Science and Humanities Education

  • Dzmitry I. Naumau, Belarus State Academy of Communications, 8/2 F. Skaryna Street, 1 building, Minsk 220076, Belarus

    PhD (sociology), docent; scientific secretary

References

  1. Krajewski M. Cancel culture: unieważniając unieważnianie. Przegląd socjologiczny. 2022;71(1):185–206. DOI: 10.26485/PS/2022/71.8.
  2. Garfinkel H. Studies in ethnomethodology [Internet]. 1967 [cited 2022 August 9]. 288 p. Available from: https://monoskop.org/images/0/0c/Garfinkel_Harold_Studies_in_Ethnomethodology.pdf.
  3. Bourdieu P. Prakticheskii smysl [Practical sense]. Bikbov AT, Voznesenskaya KD, Zenkin SN, Shmatko NA, translators; Shmatko NA, editor. Saint Petersburg: Aleteiya; 2001. 562 p. Russian.
  4. Kachanov YuL, Shmatko NA. [«Habitus» instead of «consciousness»: theory and experiment]. Sociology: Methodology, Methods, Mathematical Models. 2000;12:25–39. Russian.
  5. Giddens A. The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration [Internet]. 2013 [cited cited 2022 August 9]. 473 p. Available from: https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=YD87I8uPvnUC&pg=GBS.PT35.w.1.0.71_185&hl=ru&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_atb.
  6. Volkov V, Khakhordin O. Teoriya praktik [Theory of practices]. Saint Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Evropeiskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge; 2008. 298 p. (Pragmatic Turn; Issue 2). Russian.
  7. Bourdieu P. Choses dites. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit; 1987. 228 р. Russian edition: Bourdieu P. Nachala. Choses dites. Shmatko NA, translator. Мoscow: Socio-Logos; 1994. 288 p.
  8. Saint-Louis H. Understanding cancel culture: normative and unequal sanctioning. First Monday [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 August 16];26(7). Available from: https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/10891. DOI: 10.5210/fm.v26i7.10891.
  9. Clark MD. Drag them: a brief etymology of so-called «cancel culture». Communication and the Public [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 August 15];5(3–4):88–92. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2057047320961562. DOI: 10.1177/2057047320961562.
  10. Dershowitz A. Cancel culture: the latest attack on free speech and due process. New York: Hot Books; 2020. 168 p.
  11. Surikov IE. Ostrakizm v Afinakh [Ostracism in Athens]. Moscow: Languages of Slavic cultures; 2006. 640 p. Russian.
  12. Ng E. Cancel culture. A critical analysis [Internet]. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2022 [cited 2022 August 16]. 153 p. Available from: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-97374-2. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-97374-2.13.
  13. Bagus Ph, Daumann F, Follert F. Cancel culture, safe spaces, and academic freedom: a private property rights perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 August 16]. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4153396. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4153396.
  14. Norris P. Cancel culture: myth or reality? Political Studies [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 August 7]. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00323217211037023. DOI: 10.1177/00323217211037023.
  15. Waani MS, Wempi JA. Cancel culture as a new social movement. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 August 16];5(7):266–270. Available from: https://www.ajhssr.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/ZF2157266270.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-05

Issue

No. 4 (2022): Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology

Section

From the Working Table of a Sociologist

License

The authors who are published in this journal agree to the following:

  1. The authors retain copyright on the work and provide the journal with the right of first publication of the work on condition of license Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial. 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
  2. The authors retain the right to enter into certain contractual agreements relating to the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. post it on the institutional repository, publication in the book), with the reference to its original publication in this journal.
  3. The authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (e.g. on the institutional store or personal website) prior to and during the review process, conducted by the journal, as this may lead to a productive discussion and a large number of references to this work. (See The Effect of Open Access.)

How to Cite

[1]
Simkhovich, V.A. and Naumau, D.I. 2022. Cancelling as a social phenomenon: theoretical aspect. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology. 4 (Dec. 2022), 71–79. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33581/2521-6821-2022-4-71-79.